2016 Postmortem

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)

9. My beat is San Diego (I think we are in California, perhaps I am mistaken)

Thu Jun 9, 2016, 12:07 PM

Jun 2016

But I did follow the issues. And PR was particularly good at triggering memories of the PRI in Mexico. Nor do I expect you to understand why those memories were fantastic. As a journalist I am concerned about this shit regardless of who it benefits. And as a Journalist I expect this crap in November.

As a person I will laugh if this election is stolen from the Dems, the partisans on this site will have a come to Jesus moment though, like oh 2000 many Democrats did, less so in 2004. Myself I will have zero sympathy, but will be concerned about it nonetheless. Just don't ask me why I don't get it, because I actually do.

Oh and what you saw in WI and AZ, for example, were dress rehearsals for November. Should be fun

You either care about this issue all the time or you don't. It does not matter who benefits or loses at the moment. And people Like Common Cause also noticed the pattern. It is like pregnancy, you either are pregnant, or you are not. There is not being half pregnant.

The only thing that in the end loses regardless of who does it is legitimacy. A dirty government, cochino gobierno, to be 18 again

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

126 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Election Integrity Project: "We have never seen such widespread mismanagement or manipulation of the [View all] J_J_ Jun 2016 OP

I do, I do. nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #1

As a journalist, have you heard reports/complaints of vote "mismanagement/manipulation" ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #3

Perfect! Great question ... excellent phrasing ... deserving of a response. Well done! NurseJackie Jun 2016 #6

Call-out of another DUer by requesting info you know will not be forthcoming. randome Jun 2016 #8

Actually, it was a sincere question ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #12

And as I explained bellow Common Cause also noticed the same exact pattern nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #20

But 1SBM asked what reports you personally have heard. n/t pnwmom Jun 2016 #106

It was a smart question in more ways than one. It's natural for people not to question Cal33 Jun 2016 #125

You're being sarcastic, right? Why should 1SBM know the poster won't answer? n/t pnwmom Jun 2016 #105

Yes, it was sarcastic. randome Jun 2016 #115

My beat is San Diego (I think we are in California, perhaps I am mistaken) nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #9

It was a sincere question ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #11

"No" nt LexVegas Jun 2016 #15

Common Cause saw the same pattern nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #18

That doesn't answer the question ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #24

Public Records Request, and I am sure the SOS will hate it nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #33

And yet, besides the ambiguous "Common Sense" reference ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #39

Common Cause, you can go look it up nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #41

Or, you can provide me a link so that I know we're working with the same analysis/report ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #49

Or I can not do that work for you nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #50

Okay ... That's a strange position for a journalist to take ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #54

What not to want to engage with somebody who asked a question that I do not think is sincere nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #55

LOL ... Okay ... LOL 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #56

Yup funny, how far we have gone nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #58

What does my "good faith" have to do with YOU providing a source for YOUR assertion? ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #60

Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #62

My "fucking proof" ... wouldn't that be your "fucking proof", presumably supportive of ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #67

Nah you can think what you want nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #68

I know the Protect the Vote people and have spoken at a couple of their events Gothmog Jun 2016 #95

Thank you for your good work ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #98

I am part of the Victory Counsel program for Clinton that requires you to be licensed Gothmog Jun 2016 #99

Please send me the contact info. 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #101

Your "Proof" is a fund raising email ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #71

I am embarrassed for you...to be so blind nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #73

Please, don't be. You don't have any embarrassment to spare. 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #84

"...A curious position for a journalist to take." Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #117

The STANDARD Answer Here Is To Ask FOR A LINK... ChiciB1 Jun 2016 #119

Or, people ask for links because so much that appears on the internet, and DU (of late) ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #120

EIP is also a Tea Party group like True the Vote WhollyHeretic Jun 2016 #51

And I am positive common cause is too? nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #57

That is quite an imagination you have. I didn't say a word about common cause. WhollyHeretic Jun 2016 #63

Yup I got quite the imagination nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #64

Okay ... This is just nuts ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #66

That was EASILY the most embarrassing dismantling I've ever seen here. Well done Number23 Jun 2016 #81

Do absolutely nothing, that is the best way to act nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #82

Interesting ... I didn't know that ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #59

And, to review, in the end there was NO credible source about ANY election fraud. Anywhere. Squinch Jun 2016 #83

I was too tired to close that loop. Thanks. And, to answer my seminal question ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #86

But something caused a riot in 1943, too. Squinch Jun 2016 #87

Nope ... it was President Obama secret ambition to cut Social Security ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #91

My head is spinning! My stomach feels all iggidy! Squinch Jun 2016 #92

But what did you see or hear or become aware of, in your professional capacity pnwmom Jun 2016 #107

Do you have a link to the "report"? Was it a Face-book screen shot? Or, Reddit? 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #116

It was here, on DU. pnwmom Jun 2016 #124

They don't care now, but will care when the Republicans do it. That's a right wing mentality. Right GoneFishin Jun 2016 #13

Not right wing, PARTISAN nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #19

I actually do see hypocrisy as a generally right wing trait. And I do consider people who call GoneFishin Jun 2016 #27

On this one it is just partisan nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #31

Ok. No problem. GoneFishin Jun 2016 #34

I'll take a gander... I am going to say NO, in the states that Sanders won, we did NOT see... Raster Jun 2016 #25

I wasn't "phishing" for an answer ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #30

You might not like my answer since it will be seen as partisan nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #32

I'm curious how answering that question would be seen as partisan? 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #38

Anything I post is seen as partisan nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #40

Curiouser ... I don't recall EVER discussing the 1943 L.A. riots with you ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #47

Curious that you do not know the history of how we actually got to 1994 nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #48

Okay ... This is really getting weird. 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #53

Looks like PepperHarlan Jun 2016 #114

Just as well ... I had reached my daily victim-creation quota ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #121

My apologies, these days on DU it's a bit difficult to determine the sincere questions... Raster Jun 2016 #35

Thanks ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #44

There could be many other responses. Raster Jun 2016 #46

I would too ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #52

Ultimately 1SBM, I think we (as a Party and as a Country) need to make sure... Raster Jun 2016 #69

Oh, Raster ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #72

I disagree. Questions were raised about the fairness and equality of the Democratic primary... Raster Jun 2016 #74

Sme of us have raised questions since 2000 nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #76

I heartily concur. Selection 2000 should have been our "wake up and smell the coffee" moment... Raster Jun 2016 #77

Exactly nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #79

"That poster" asked a question that was never answered. 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #90

The thing is, nobody in power gave a shit. Fuddnik Jun 2016 #102

Interesting ... Did you retain any of what you uncovered ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #123

True that. Since 2,000 I've blasted the DNC in all-caps for knowingly letting it to go on, ancianita Jun 2016 #88

I don't know what you are referring to here ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #85

Almost all the purported problems came from people who had incorrectly pnwmom Jun 2016 #111

Election protection and election law is one of my areas Gothmog Jun 2016 #93

Would this ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #2

Why do people only complain about elections IN THE MIDST of elections? DetlefK Jun 2016 #4

See post 102 above. Fuddnik Jun 2016 #103

I have never seen such widespread problems with voter registration rolls. HooptieWagon Jun 2016 #5

Democrats did nothing about what happened in 2000 when they had the chance. corkhead Jun 2016 #10

exactly J_J_ Jun 2016 #22

New Democrats do anyway. nt valerief Jun 2016 #29

"those" people Dem2 Jun 2016 #122

Republicans had a closed primary and only one candidate still in the race. pnwmom Jun 2016 #108

Not every state was close and one candidate. HooptieWagon Jun 2016 #110

The OP and discussion here is about California. Have you closely studied pnwmom Jun 2016 #112

Seeing as NPP voters are not in fact requried to vote with provisional ballot, this seems to be BS. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #7

You apparently have low information about what happened. HooptieWagon Jun 2016 #14

That is true. The state didnt' read their mind to know they wanted a Dem ballot. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #16

Or the state ignored what they said. HooptieWagon Jun 2016 #17

No, you have incorrect information Retrograde Jun 2016 #26

Your information is just as 'low." Republicans had a closed primary open only to R's. n/t pnwmom Jun 2016 #109

From my niece who lives in CA. Jennylynn Jun 2016 #21

I had to repeat the words cross over ballots twice nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #23

Maybe someone from The Guardian will look into this. We certainly don't expect U.S. "journalists" to valerief Jun 2016 #28

So will Hill fans call the Election Integrity Project "Conspiracy Theorists?" senz Jun 2016 #36

Maybe you should do a little reading on them WhollyHeretic Jun 2016 #42

We have group like in Texas called True the Vote Gothmog Jun 2016 #96

How about Tea Party activists? Il_Coniglietto Jun 2016 #43

K & R AzDar Jun 2016 #37

You realize that is a tea party group? Related to True the Vote WhollyHeretic Jun 2016 #45

The Voting Rights Act was just gutted recently gollygee Jun 2016 #61

They are ok with it as long as they can do that to people like me and you nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #65

Thread Winner! Raster Jun 2016 #70

It will get worse until we have a constitutional RIGHT to vote Ferd Berfel Jun 2016 #75

Needed for the Constitution: Raster Jun 2016 #78

The full second bill of rights nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #80

Not direct manipulation of the polls but this video is interesting regards google search. PufPuf23 Jun 2016 #89

Thanks. Interesting. 840high Jun 2016 #104

HUGE NEWS IN THIS VIDEO: LAWSUITS BEING FILED... kadaholo Jun 2016 #94

That lawsuit appears to be based on some wild CT based on exit polls being 100% accurate Gothmog Jun 2016 #97

Funny... kadaholo Jun 2016 #100

I watched the sad and silly party of the video discussing the lawsuit Gothmog Jun 2016 #118

Reminder: Exit Poll Conspiracy Theories Are Totally Baseless creeksneakers2 Jun 2016 #113

Elections are not the results of exit polls in which a different answer can be provided than Thinkingabout Jun 2016 #126