Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: New Hillary Scandal Checks All the Boxes on the Clinton Controversy Bingo Card [View all]samson212
(83 posts)100. Really? OK, I'll do the due diligence for those readers who will just take you at your word.
A former Congressman from Nebraska is definitely covered by "filled with nuclear scientists, past Cabinet secretaries, and former members of Congress
"
You're being extremely misleading. I'll go one by one, if that helps.
- Hon. Gary Hart: was the chairman of the Threat Reduction Advisory Council.
- Hon. Charles B. Curtis: this one's easy. He was "Senior Advisor to the Center for Strategic and International Studies, President Emeritus of the Nuclear Threat Initiative and former Deputy Secretary of Energy". I don't think I need to provide links for those.
- Hon. Graham Allison: "Director of the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs ... at the Kennedy School of Government"
- Amb. Brooke D. Anderson: "served ... on the Iran Nuclear Negotiations"
- Hon. Douglas Bereuter: former Republican Congressman from Nebraska (I guess Nebraska congressmen don't count as congressmen?)
- Dr. Bruce Blair: a professor (oh look, a scientist!) and co-founder of Global Zero, an organization devoted to bringing about a "world without nuclear weapons". According to Wikipedia, he is a "nuclear security expert and a research scholar at the Program on Science and Global Security at Princeton University's Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs"
- Amb. Linton F. Brooks: a researcher (ooh, another scientist) and advisor "on national security issues", who worked on the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (link included in case you've never heard of it)
- BGen Stephen A. Cheney: among other things, former "Deputy Executive Secretary to the Secretary of Defense, and Inspector General of the Marine Corps". Seems like he might have relevant experience to me, though perhaps you'd like to research this one a little more.
- Mr. Joseph Cirincione: this is one of the ones you were disdainful about. He's the president of the Ploughshares Fund. If you had googled it, you'd see that it's pretty relevant. Their landing page says, "Ploughshares Fund supports the smartest minds and most effective organizations to reduce nuclear stockpiles, prevent new nuclear states, and increase global security." I wonder if running an organization like that gives him some useful experience and perspective?
- ...
There are quite a few more, but I'm bored now. I guess it's clear that you actually read the whole list and then decided to misrepresent it, since you referenced the only hedge fund manager, Robert Rose, "President of Robert Rose Consulting, LLC and former Senior Advisor to the Chairman of Bridgewater Associates, one of the largest hedge funds in the world". I'll concede that he seems out of place. I wonder if he had a similar deal with somebody in Clinton's administration, or if it was someone previous to her. Actually, it's possible that he's a new addition, since this is the list of current members.
If you'd like to look through the rest of that list and point out the members that you think are comparable in terms of irrelevance to a securities trader, I will gladly discuss it with you. If not, I'll assume you're just being intentionally misleading and we can leave it at that.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
200 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
New Hillary Scandal Checks All the Boxes on the Clinton Controversy Bingo Card [View all]
NWCorona
Jun 2016
OP
Attacking the Democratic nominee with speculative "scandal", that's the problem.
George II
Jun 2016
#87
maybe you havent heard the news. It is not speculative, and she is not yet the nominee
swhisper1
Jun 2016
#165
So what is the point? Lots of subjective speculation. But since you said it, looks like....
George II
Jun 2016
#88
She's a disaster. I cannot support this. We can wait another four years for our first woman prez.
reformist2
Jun 2016
#6
How old are you - 5? Obviously it's not just Trump that has to make up silly
ohheckyeah
Jun 2016
#74
exposing a person who is not yet the nominee makes absolute sense, and if she
swhisper1
Jun 2016
#164
So, if someone here brings up Debbie Wasserman Schultz campaigning for Republicans, when Democrats
-none
Jun 2016
#158
I look forward to your efforts in defeating Trump. Haranguing about how "flawed, seriously flawed"…
NurseJackie
Jun 2016
#95
My actions were to nominate the candidate who has the best chance to defeat Trump, IMO.
chwaliszewski
Jun 2016
#119
Is there anything about Hillary you don't like or wish she would change?
chwaliszewski
Jun 2016
#146
Didn't see your post! This is just tip of iceberg; imagine the emails that are not being released u
amborin
Jun 2016
#21
The problem for Hillary is the fact that this has crossed over to the mainstream media.
NWCorona
Jun 2016
#22
The mainstream media has always been happy to uncritically report BS from fring RW sites. -nt-
Lord Magus
Jun 2016
#67
It has been everywhere and it is still right wing Bull shit that is going nowhere.
Demsrule86
Jun 2016
#125
Really? OK, I'll do the due diligence for those readers who will just take you at your word.
samson212
Jun 2016
#100
You're right, I didn't Google everyone on the list. You did. So...no misleading from me.
randome
Jun 2016
#111
Did any of them have to resign less than 48hrs after their credentials were questioned?
NWCorona
Jun 2016
#50
I don't understand why that occurred. Obviously something was 'wrong' about the appointment.
randome
Jun 2016
#51
No it isn't just my opinion. ABC tried to get that answer and alarm bells went of at State Dept.
NWCorona
Jun 2016
#54
He was so qualified he resigned after a few days. Hillary knows how to pick them....
think
Jun 2016
#45
Trump is in heaven over this story. I see him on CNN talking about this. So to answer your question
jillan
Jun 2016
#73
5 and half days and there will be no more posting VILE right wing crap on this board. Shame on you.
riversedge
Jun 2016
#78
He was a big donor who wanted to play "Policy Big Shot" by sitting on a prestigious board as a peer
Midwestern Democrat
Jun 2016
#116
The time to post every alleged Clinton scandal that man has ever invented, is over.
kstewart33
Jun 2016
#96
This is nothing. I imagine he was added because he had a relationship with someone on the council
underthematrix
Jun 2016
#157
Taking out all the right wing trash that would fit right in at Freak Republic
workinclasszero
Jun 2016
#194
I hope this doesn't get me into trouble but I only heard about this case today
Fast Walker 52
Sep 2016
#200