Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
13. Yes it does, esp. considering how much NSA work is done by private contractors.
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 05:19 PM
Jun 2016

Secret government means secret policies and secret beneficiaries.

Behind the Curtain: Booz Allen Hamilton and its Owner, The Carlyle Group

Written by Bob Adelmann
The New American; June 13, 2013

According to writers Thomas Heath and Marjorie Censer at the Washington Post, The Carlyle Group and its errant child, Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH), have a public relations problem, thanks to NSA leaker and former BAH employee Edward Snowden. By the time top management at BAH learned that one of their top level agents had gone rogue, and terminated his employment, it was too late.

For years Carlyle had, according to the Post, “nurtured a reputation as a financially sophisticated asset manager that buys and sells everything from railroads to oil refineries”; but now the light from the Snowden revelations has revealed nothing more than two companies, parent and child, “bound by the thread of turning government secrets into profits.”

And have they ever. When The Carlyle Group bought BAH back in 2008, it was totally dependent upon government contracts in the fields of information technology (IT) and systems engineering for its bread and butter. But there wasn't much butter: After two years the company’s gross revenues were $5.1 billion but net profits were a minuscule $25 million, close to a rounding error on the company’s financial statement. In 2012, however, BAH grossed $5.8 billion and showed earnings of $219 million, nearly a nine-fold increase in net revenues and a nice gain in value for Carlyle.

Unwittingly, the Post authors exposed the real reason for the jump in profitability: close ties and interconnected relationships between top people at Carlyle and BAH, and the agencies with which they are working. The authors quoted George Price, an equity analyst at BB&T Capital: " got a great brand, they've focused over time on hiring top people, including bringing on people who have a lot of senior government experience." (Emphasis added.)

For instance, James Clapper had a stint at BAH before becoming the current Director of National Intelligence; George Little consulted with BAH before taking a position at the Central Intelligence Agency; John McConnell, now vice chairman at BAH, was director of the National Security Agency (NSA) in the ‘90s before moving up to director of national intelligence in 2007; Todd Park began his career with BAH and now serves as the country's chief technology officer; James Woolsey, currently a senior vice president at BAH, served in the past as director of the Central Intelligence Agency; and so on.

BAH has had more than a little problem with self-dealing and conflicts of interest over the years. For instance in 2006 the European Commission asked the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Privacy International (PI) to investigate BAH’s involvement with President George Bush’s SWIFT surveillance program, which was viewed by that administration as “just another tool” in its so-called “War on Terror.” The only problem is that it was illegal, as it violated U.S., Belgian, and European privacy laws. BAH was right in the middle of it. According to the ACLU/PI report,

Though Booz Allen’s role is to verify that the access to the SWIFT data is not abused, its relationship with the U.S. Government calls its objectivity significantly into question. (Emphasis added.)

Among Booz Allen’s senior consulting staff are several former members of the intelligence community, including a former Director of the CIA and a former director of the NSA.


As noted by Barry Steinhardt, an ACLU director, “It’s bad enough that the administration is trying to hold out a private company as a substitute for genuine checks and balances on its surveillance activities. But of all companies to perform audits on a secret surveillance program, it would be difficult to find one less objective and more intertwined with the U.S. government security establishment.” (Emphasis added.)

CONTINUED w Links n Privatized INTEL...

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/crime/item/15696-behind-the-curtain-booz-allen-hamilton-and-its-owner-the-carlyle-group

Ever hear of the Carlyle Group, YouDig? Look 'em up.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Four Points make me FOR Bernie [View all] Octafish Jun 2016 OP
I'm sure Bernie Sanders will be able to bring these issues up when he's back in the Senate. brooklynite Jun 2016 #1
I hope Hillary does if she's the nominee. Octafish Jun 2016 #4
Hillary agrees with all those. YouDig Jun 2016 #2
Not when it comes to NSA domestic spying. Octafish Jun 2016 #5
That article has nothing to do with your OP. YouDig Jun 2016 #6
Here's help. Octafish Jun 2016 #9
That article still has nothing to do with your OP. What does the NSA have to do with YouDig Jun 2016 #10
Yes it does, esp. considering how much NSA work is done by private contractors. Octafish Jun 2016 #13
Octafish... brentspeak Jun 2016 #29
Truer words were never spoken (about the entity and praising Octafish's efforts)! nt 2cannan Jun 2016 #32
Swoon.. Ah, Octafish! Melissa G Jun 2016 #36
Here's detail on how NSA spying helps the well-to-do. Octafish Jun 2016 #11
I'm about conspiracy theoried out. YouDig Jun 2016 #12
Profound for you. Octafish Jun 2016 #14
You've only been here for about 60 days, I dig that. bobthedrummer Jun 2016 #15
Stratfor via WikiLeaks saw problems from the beginning for Clinton Foundation... Octafish Jun 2016 #18
I like your taste in westerns, Octafish. senz Jun 2016 #27
Thanks, senz! Sergio Leone and Jethro Tull all day long. Octafish Jun 2016 #33
Interesting, Octafish. senz Jun 2016 #42
Uh-huh. The USA is a Reaganomic Republic. immoderate Jun 2016 #3
Trickle Down Voodoo has WASTED 7/8 of all the wealth in history on the rich. Octafish Jun 2016 #7
The rat exercising the trap laserhaas Jun 2016 #25
K&R bobthedrummer Jun 2016 #8
The Good Shepherd Octafish Jun 2016 #16
Why doesn't that important OP have a "permalink?" I thought all comments did. senz Jun 2016 #30
Interesting article. Xyzse Jun 2016 #17
Glen Ford is a real journalist. Octafish Jun 2016 #19
I don't want to hear his voice unless it says...I concede. nt. Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #22
Your attitude explains your level of awareness. Octafish Jun 2016 #31
It is customary for the loser of any election or primary to concede. Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #37
I'm for my nextdoor neighbor, Stan...but he's not on the general election ballot either. nt eastwestdem Jun 2016 #20
Is Stan a Democrat? Here's some of what one Democrat managed to do in only 1,037 days in office. Octafish Jun 2016 #23
Have you ever heard about a little altercation called the bay of pigs? Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #38
JFK stood up to the warmongers. Every time. Octafish Jun 2016 #39
for who? Oh yeah Bernie ...well he lost. So who cares? Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #21
Who's the real loser, Demsrule86? Octafish Jun 2016 #24
The corporate Red states laserhaas Jun 2016 #26
Agents for Bush Octafish Jun 2016 #34
WOW...I've read 'Crossing the Rubicon' 4 times laserhaas Jun 2016 #35
Concise and well put felix_numinous Jun 2016 #28
That's an excellent list, I couldn't agree more. Uncle Joe Jun 2016 #40
Not long ago = still does today. N.T. Donald Ian Rankin Jun 2016 #41
A Dr. Strangelove for the 21st Century (Steve Breyman May 9, 2014) kick bobthedrummer Jun 2016 #43
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Four Points make me FOR B...»Reply #13