Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
39. JFK stood up to the warmongers. Every time.
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 02:27 PM
Jun 2016

Case in point:

At a meeting in July 1961 they counseled JFK to attack in the Fall of 1963, when the USA would enjoy optimum strategic and tactical superiority. It's something important that's been missed by journalists and historians due to all copies but one getting burned...



Did the U.S. Military Plan a Nuclear First Strike for 1963?

Recently declassified information shows that the military presented President Kennedy with a plan for a surprise nuclear attack on the Soviet Union in the early 1960s.

James K. Galbraith and Heather A. Purcell
The American Prospect | September 21, 1994

During the early 1960s the intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) introduced the world to the possibility of instant total war. Thirty years later, no nation has yet fired any nuclear missile at a real target. Orthodox history holds that a succession of defensive nuclear doctrines and strategies -- from "massive retaliation" to "mutual assured destruction" -- worked, almost seamlessly, to deter Soviet aggression against the United States and to prevent the use of nuclear weapons.

The possibility of U.S. aggression in nuclear conflict is seldom considered. And why should it be? Virtually nothing in the public record suggests that high U.S. authorities ever contemplated a first strike against the Soviet Union, except in response to a Soviet invasion of Western Europe, or that they doubted the deterrent power of Soviet nuclear forces. The main documented exception was the Air Force Chief of Staff in the early 1960s, Curtis LeMay, a seemingly idiosyncratic case.

But beginning in 1957 the U.S. military did prepare plans for a preemptive nuclear strike against the U.S.S.R., based on our growing lead in land-based missiles. And top military and intelligence leaders presented an assessment of those plans to President John F. Kennedy in July of 1961. At that time, some high Air Force and CIA leaders apparently believed that a window of outright ballistic missile superiority, perhaps sufficient for a successful first strike, would be open in late 1963.

The document reproduced opposite is published here for the first time. It describes a meeting of the National Security Council on July 20, 1961. At that meeting, the document shows, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the director of the CIA, and others presented plans for a surprise attack. They answered some questions from Kennedy about timing and effects, and promised further information. The meeting recessed under a presidential injunction of secrecy that has not been broken until now.

CONTINUED...

http://prospect.org/article/did-us-military-plan-nuclear-first-strike-1963



''And we call ourselves the human race.'' - President John F. Kennedy, after walking out of that briefing.

More important information "Left Out" of the official narrative.

And some more on the history of that time:

LEMNITZER and DULLES knew Bay of Pigs Operation was COMPROMISED, yet gave it their blessings...

CIA Successfuly Conceals Bay of Pigs History

‘Wasn’t that, like, the Bay of Pigs thing?’

Please don't rewrite history, Demsrule86. Learn it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Four Points make me FOR Bernie [View all] Octafish Jun 2016 OP
I'm sure Bernie Sanders will be able to bring these issues up when he's back in the Senate. brooklynite Jun 2016 #1
I hope Hillary does if she's the nominee. Octafish Jun 2016 #4
Hillary agrees with all those. YouDig Jun 2016 #2
Not when it comes to NSA domestic spying. Octafish Jun 2016 #5
That article has nothing to do with your OP. YouDig Jun 2016 #6
Here's help. Octafish Jun 2016 #9
That article still has nothing to do with your OP. What does the NSA have to do with YouDig Jun 2016 #10
Yes it does, esp. considering how much NSA work is done by private contractors. Octafish Jun 2016 #13
Octafish... brentspeak Jun 2016 #29
Truer words were never spoken (about the entity and praising Octafish's efforts)! nt 2cannan Jun 2016 #32
Swoon.. Ah, Octafish! Melissa G Jun 2016 #36
Here's detail on how NSA spying helps the well-to-do. Octafish Jun 2016 #11
I'm about conspiracy theoried out. YouDig Jun 2016 #12
Profound for you. Octafish Jun 2016 #14
You've only been here for about 60 days, I dig that. bobthedrummer Jun 2016 #15
Stratfor via WikiLeaks saw problems from the beginning for Clinton Foundation... Octafish Jun 2016 #18
I like your taste in westerns, Octafish. senz Jun 2016 #27
Thanks, senz! Sergio Leone and Jethro Tull all day long. Octafish Jun 2016 #33
Interesting, Octafish. senz Jun 2016 #42
Uh-huh. The USA is a Reaganomic Republic. immoderate Jun 2016 #3
Trickle Down Voodoo has WASTED 7/8 of all the wealth in history on the rich. Octafish Jun 2016 #7
The rat exercising the trap laserhaas Jun 2016 #25
K&R bobthedrummer Jun 2016 #8
The Good Shepherd Octafish Jun 2016 #16
Why doesn't that important OP have a "permalink?" I thought all comments did. senz Jun 2016 #30
Interesting article. Xyzse Jun 2016 #17
Glen Ford is a real journalist. Octafish Jun 2016 #19
I don't want to hear his voice unless it says...I concede. nt. Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #22
Your attitude explains your level of awareness. Octafish Jun 2016 #31
It is customary for the loser of any election or primary to concede. Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #37
I'm for my nextdoor neighbor, Stan...but he's not on the general election ballot either. nt eastwestdem Jun 2016 #20
Is Stan a Democrat? Here's some of what one Democrat managed to do in only 1,037 days in office. Octafish Jun 2016 #23
Have you ever heard about a little altercation called the bay of pigs? Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #38
JFK stood up to the warmongers. Every time. Octafish Jun 2016 #39
for who? Oh yeah Bernie ...well he lost. So who cares? Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #21
Who's the real loser, Demsrule86? Octafish Jun 2016 #24
The corporate Red states laserhaas Jun 2016 #26
Agents for Bush Octafish Jun 2016 #34
WOW...I've read 'Crossing the Rubicon' 4 times laserhaas Jun 2016 #35
Concise and well put felix_numinous Jun 2016 #28
That's an excellent list, I couldn't agree more. Uncle Joe Jun 2016 #40
Not long ago = still does today. N.T. Donald Ian Rankin Jun 2016 #41
A Dr. Strangelove for the 21st Century (Steve Breyman May 9, 2014) kick bobthedrummer Jun 2016 #43
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Four Points make me FOR B...»Reply #39