Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Consortium News: The War Risk of Hillary Clinton [View all]Dustlawyer
(10,531 posts)9. Great debate style! Fact free, no pointing out where there may be errors, exaggerations, nor
explanations of Hillary's policies. Where have I seen and heard this fabulous debating style before? Oh yea, Trump!
Yes, I guess us doody heads will be flushed and DU will become one big Hillary Clinton Group echo chamber! You will pat each other on the back and congratulate each other on your obvious superiority, happily ignoring any flaw or fault of your candidate. Positively blind to any potential problems with your candidate. Objectivity never enters DU after that date!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Monday will be here before you know it ... and then the BS sewer gets cleaned up n/t
SFnomad
Jun 2016
#7
Great debate style! Fact free, no pointing out where there may be errors, exaggerations, nor
Dustlawyer
Jun 2016
#9
And where else do we see one negative article after another about Secretary Clinton, hoping, praying
SFnomad
Jun 2016
#10
I will not let Hillary off of the hook for all of the money she OWES DONORS FOR as it is not in
Dustlawyer
Jun 2016
#19
DU puts the Democratic back in their D ... where we work to elect them, rather than pointlessly
SFnomad
Jun 2016
#39
Thank you for providing an example of the pointlessness I was talking about n/t
SFnomad
Jun 2016
#43
That comment would have more weight it you contributed to DU, instead of mooching "free stuff."
TheBlackAdder
Jun 2016
#18
So my comment would have more "weight" if I contributed money to the site? What an elitist crock.
SFnomad
Jun 2016
#22
Like SBS not being a real Democrat, you're not a real DUer because you don't join as a member.
TheBlackAdder
Jun 2016
#25
Because you're a "real" DUer, you don't see the ads that I do ... and being that they're part of the
SFnomad
Jun 2016
#27
Ah, yes. An Elitist is someone who asks a person to pay to use a site, when they push site action.
TheBlackAdder
Jun 2016
#28
No, an elitist is someone that says you're not a "real memeber" UNLESS you pay n/t
SFnomad
Jun 2016
#29
I drew on that silly "not a Democrat" line you use against SBS. I see you failed to grap that point.
TheBlackAdder
Jun 2016
#30
I can't remember a Democratic Nominee so open about using force for just about everything.
EndElectoral
Jun 2016
#15