Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Protip: Citing Russia Today does not help your case [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)3. How about that time The New York Times lied America into war?
Trick Question: The New York Times ALWAYS helps lie America into war.
The Gulf of Tonkin Incident.
The Newspaper of War
by Howard Friel
Published on Tuesday, May 13, 2014 by Common Dreams
Many years ago, Ho Chi Minhs North Vietnam, Communist China, and Soviet Russia were saying one thing about what had happened in the Gulf of Tonkin in early August 1964, while President Johnson and top administration officials were all saying the exact opposite. How should the Times have responded to that situation, assuming a commitment to an independent press and an informed citizenry?
Ten years earlier, in July 1954, the governments of Britain, France, the Soviet Union, and China all signed the Final Declaration of the Geneva Accord on Vietnam, which formally concluded Frances U.S.-supported colonial war in Vietnam. The United States refused to sign, and thereafter proceeded to undermine the most important stipulation of the accord that elections to unify the northern and southern zones of Vietnam take place in 1956. By what journalistic criteria should the New York Times have covered this refusal by the Eisenhower administration to sign and comply with the Geneva Accord on Vietnam, which opened the door to the twenty-year American military campaign in Vietnam?
When Bush, Cheney, Powell, Rumsfeld, and Rice claimed in 2001-2003 that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction, including an active nuclear weapons program, and when Saddam Hussein denied those claims, what journalistic standard did the Times apply in its response to those conflicting claims?
Journalism schools should teach a course focused on questions like these, given that over the past sixty years the Times and every other mainstream news organization has repeatedly flunked such tests, in each instance aiding the governments efforts in its illegal interventions and wars.
CONTINUED...
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2014/05/13-0
This is the "paper of record" that gave us Judith Miller and aluminum tubes, while failing to mention word that George W Bush's illegal domestic spying operation until after Selection 2004. I also want to emphasize this paper has done all it can to keep up the fiction that Lee Harvey Oswald alone shot President John F. Kennedy, who had ordered withdrawal of the U.S. from Vietnam. In addition, this is an important read for those interested in seeing how Corporate McPravda exclusively serves the warmongers and not the People, as intended by the nation's Founders in the First Amendment to the Constitution.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
37 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Neither does any news source that has something negative to say about HRC. Neither linking to videos
insta8er
Jun 2016
#2
Dunno what that has to do with the post. Didn't mention the NY Times once.
ButterflyBlood
Jun 2016
#6
Anyone who's been here longer than 5 years should be considered a 'pro', perhaps?
randome
Jun 2016
#21
WELL the reality according to the Secretary of State (in Calif's) own web papes -
truedelphi
Jun 2016
#18
not at all true. Nearly One million ballots remained uncounted during the GM food
truedelphi
Jun 2016
#22
At no point did any official in California state the ballots would not be counted.
ButterflyBlood
Jun 2016
#24
"Activists" had nothing to do with it and "flipping" counties means nothing.
Lord Magus
Jun 2016
#27
you guys are HILARIOUS. RT isn't Putin Propaganda. Ed Shultz and Thom Hartmann
pdsimdars
Jun 2016
#37