Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

JTFrog

(14,274 posts)
10. Here is what Skinner posted in 2008:
Mon Jun 20, 2016, 12:51 AM
Jun 2016
https://web.archive.org/web/20080828111734/http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x6344459

Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts)
Wed Jun-11-08 01:33 PM
Original message

Welcome to the General Election. So, what does this mean for Democratic Underground? Updated at 7:08 PM

Now that the Democratic presidential primaries are over, and the seven-day transitional period here on DU has passed, it's time to start looking forward to the General Election between Barack Obama and John McCain.

I think the switch to General Election mode has gone better than expected so far, and I honestly believe that the vast majority of visitors to this website have not had any difficulty moving forward and coming together to support our presidential nominee. Indeed, most of the people who were very active in the heated primary discussions of the past six to nine months have already made great efforts to rebuild the bridges they burned during that time. I'm very glad to see this - but not entirely surprised, considering that the differences between Senator Obama and Senator McCain are so vast and so glaringly obvious.

Unfortunately, there will be a very small number of people on both sides of the former Obama-Clinton divide who want to keep fighting the primaries. I know from previous experience that some of these people will not be able to let it go for years, and may never fully come to terms with what has happened. Hopefully these people will be able to find solace elsewhere because as of today there is no place on DU for those who seem committed to a never-ending rehash of the 2008 Democratic primaries.

If you are wondering what will be permitted here from now on, here is a short excerpt from our rules:

Constructive criticism of Democrats or the Democratic Party is permitted. When doing so, please keep in mind that most of our members come to this website in order to get a break from the constant attacks in the media against our candidates and our values. Highly inflammatory or divisive attacks that echo the tone or substance of our political opponents are not welcome here.

You are not permitted to use this message board to work for the defeat of the Democratic Party nominee for any political office. If you wish to work for the defeat of any Democratic candidate in any General Election, then you are welcome to use someone else's bandwidth on some other website.


That pretty much covers everything you need to know...

* Constructive criticism of Democrats or the Democratic Party: Permitted.
* Highly inflammatory or divisive attacks against Democrats: Not permitted.
* Using this message board to work for the defeat of any Democratic Party nominee for any political office: Not permitted.

If you follow those rules, you'll be just fine. If you try to find a way around those rules, you take your chances with the moderators. It's that simple.

SO, WHAT DOES THAT ALL REALLY MEAN?

It is really easy to tell you what is permitted and what is not but in practice it is often very difficult to enforce the guidelines that we set, and that is particularly true in this case. We want to make DU a more civil and unified community where members can support the Democratic nominee, but we do not want to go overboard and disallow honest and open discussion of certain issues. This means that we can rarely draw a bright line and say "Do not cross."

With this in mind, here are a few issues to consider:

Now that Senator Obama is our presumptive nominee, he holds a special position in the party, and on Democratic Underground. Barack Obama is now the only person on the planet who can stop John McCain and finally put an end to the disastrous policies of the Bush Administration. You don't have to love the guy. Heck, you don't even have to particularly like him. But if you act like you want him to lose in November we're not going to cut you a great deal of slack.

You're still allowed to criticize Democrats. And you're even allowed to criticize Barack Obama. But if your criticism smells like a partisan political attack designed to tear down our candidates and help our Republican opponents, we're likely to conclude that it is.

Believing or spreading certain right-wing smears about Senator Obama or Michelle Obama could earn you an immediate tombstone. Ignorance is not an excuse -- everyone on Democratic Underground should know better on this stuff. Some examples: The suggestion that Senator Obama is a Muslim; xeonophobic use of his middle name; spreading rumors about secret videotapes with racist rants. If you're acting like a Freeper or a "concern troll," we'll assume that you are one.

You may not post threats to vote third party, to vote McCain, to not vote, or to write-in a Democrat other than Barack Obama. As in 2004, we will permit some room for sincere expressions of ambivalence toward voting for the Democratic nominee. But we're not going to permit this website to be used for much beyond that. If it looks like you are trying to get people to withhold their votes from Senator Obama, then we're likely to conclude that that is your intent.

No more attacks against people based on the candidate they supported during the primaries. There are no more Clinton supporters, Edwards supporters, or Kucinich supporters on Democratic Underground -- at least not in the sense of supporting their candidacy for president. We are Democrats, and our opponents are John McCain and the Republican Party. So starting threads to attack Clinton supporters or Edwards supporters or Kucinich supporters makes no sense, and it is also counter-productive. Similarly, starting threads to attack Obama supporters would be pretty foolish and nonsensical.

No gratuitous rehashing of the primary fighting. We can't possibly give specific instructions about what is permitted or what is not. The Democratic presidential primary is recent history, and still very fresh in all of our minds, so it is inevitable that there will continue to be a number of discussions on Democratic Underground about it. But if you seem to be discussing the primary in order to inflame or divide our members, we will assume that that is your intent. This goes for people on BOTH SIDES of the former Clinton-Obama divide.

Don't trash the moderators. You all should know how this works by now. If you want the moderators to consider taking action on a post, the first thing you need to do is alert on it. No alert, no action. But more importantly, take a moment right now to re-familiarize yourself with the idea that the moderators are not always going to do your bidding. They arrive at decisions by consensus, and their collaborative process will not always produce the result you desire. If you believe they have truly screwed up then the proper procedure is to send a message to an administrator to see if you can get the decision overturned. Messages that don't contain threats or long passages all in capital letters are more likely to receive a positive hearing, but I'll be honest - in most cases you shouldn't be surprised if the administrator sides with the moderators' decision. What you should absolutely NOT do is start spamming the moderators with rude alerts or private messages, or start threads to slam them publicly. We have, and always will, take a very dim view of this kind of activity.

Have realistic expectations. This is a very active discussion forum filled with passionate, opinionated people. As such, there will always be plenty of robust disagreement. If you're expecting that from now on everyone will always agree with you, or that everyone will always say nice things about Democratic public figures you like -- particularly public figures who have always been controversial here -- then your expectations are not realistic.

I think the vast majority of DUers are relieved to have the Democratic primaries behind us, and are excited about the General Election contest ahead. It's time to look forward, not backward, and we hope that everyone here will do what is necessary to help unify our community, and help win the election in the fall.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I was here and I DO remember that. I took a little break, adjusted my attitude, MADem Jun 2016 #1
I hope Bernie supporters do the same... chillfactor Jun 2016 #2
Don't expect people back. peace13 Jun 2016 #3
That's fine vdogg Jun 2016 #151
We must not let tRump win... that goes without saying. InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2016 #159
They will; the ones who are Democrats and liberals, anyway. MADem Jun 2016 #6
I really resent people telling me, a 60 year old woman who has voted dem in every election jillan Jun 2016 #8
With you, love. elleng Jun 2016 #19
Hey love... sheshe2 Jun 2016 #144
No one is calling you as an individual those things Armstead Jun 2016 #171
Has anyone, anyone at all implied it is in fact, The Only Thing? LanternWaste Jun 2016 #174
Huh? Who said that? MADem Jun 2016 #20
Stop pretending that you are not trying to offend notadmblnd Jun 2016 #24
You need to just STOP. I didn't say what you're accusing me of saying. MADem Jun 2016 #30
You need to stop. notadmblnd Jun 2016 #36
Get over it. We are at the cusp of an historic moment for our nation. nt MADem Jun 2016 #38
No we aren't. More of the same. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #48
Mmm hmmm. nt MADem Jun 2016 #53
Historic moment, my ass... tex-wyo-dem Jun 2016 #61
Status quo? Establishment? Please. Enough with the buzzwords. MADem Jun 2016 #65
So out to lunch...sorry I engaged... tex-wyo-dem Jun 2016 #69
Two more--So out to lunch/lost cause. MADem Jun 2016 #112
Rack 'em up, MADem... tex-wyo-dem Jun 2016 #118
You are the one "racking 'em up" -- not me. nt MADem Jun 2016 #122
I'm just pointing out a general trend with your... tex-wyo-dem Jun 2016 #131
That is not what you are doing. nt MADem Jun 2016 #135
"By that standard, Strom Thurmond was the Che of the South". AgadorSparticus Jun 2016 #95
Yes. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #116
Yeah, that whole PP thing flummoxed me, too. MADem Jun 2016 #120
They have no place else to go. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #129
There's always Discussionist! MADem Jun 2016 #137
You do realize... Else You Are Mad Jun 2016 #177
I resent that there was all this excitement about there being the 1st black president but none about kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #110
There are lots of young women (and old women) and young girls for whom this is an important MADem Jun 2016 #113
See, there it is again... tex-wyo-dem Jun 2016 #134
Well, he wouldn't have been--the first Jew, that is--to compete for the office, at any rate. MADem Jun 2016 #152
Very disappointing , but very predictable...considering the demographic profile of the "unexcited". Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #145
Because she is a woman? notadmblnd Jun 2016 #74
For me, it's icing on the cake. And a BIG effing deal. nt MADem Jun 2016 #90
Well I hope you get a nice big slice of it. notadmblnd Jun 2016 #97
And she's used it like a hammer to accuse ... tex-wyo-dem Jun 2016 #106
Who has done this? Who is this she who has done this thing? MADem Jun 2016 #108
She = her surrogates... tex-wyo-dem Jun 2016 #139
I think collective punishment is a non-starter. "She" has done no such thing. MADem Jun 2016 #146
Oh, you have said plenty over the past year. Do you think our memories are that short? nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #41
I have supported MY candidate--and that, like it or not, is not a crime. nt MADem Jun 2016 #42
You've done much worse than that. And I do consider supporting Hillary pretty bad. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #47
You consider supporting Hillary pretty bad, do you? Why are you still here? MADem Jun 2016 #55
Not midnight yet, have some patience. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #60
It's midnight in my neck o'the woods--it's 0153 hours as I type this! nt MADem Jun 2016 #67
Guess your neck of the woods doesn't count. Blame Skinner, not me. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #68
I can wait until Pacific time, if needs must! nt MADem Jun 2016 #77
You'll have to. And till the convention too, nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #83
It's been over since NY. nt MADem Jun 2016 #86
Nope, it goes on through July. Deal with it. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #89
You are welcome to believe that if it makes you feel better. MADem Jun 2016 #99
I hate break it to you but DU is not the rest of the world. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #125
I am not talking about DU. MADem Jun 2016 #132
Not the whole world. Stop limiting your views. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #133
I am not "limiting my views." The whole world knows she is the MADem Jun 2016 #136
Never said she wasn't. Presumptive being the key word. You do know what it means? nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #138
Yes--and it means what it meant when we ascribed it to POTUS Obama, and John Kerry and Al Gore and MADem Jun 2016 #148
You've said plenty to me and other Bernie supporters ... tex-wyo-dem Jun 2016 #57
I have NEVER gotten personal with you--but you can't say the same to me. MADem Jun 2016 #62
Well, you have gotten personal with plenty of others. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #70
No, I haven't. I stick to issues and ideas, and very often, when it MADem Jun 2016 #73
I've been a witness and on the recieving end. Try a simple search. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #79
If it's so simple, show me where I've personally insulted you. MADem Jun 2016 #84
I really don't have anytime to spare for you. Especially in light of the fact that I won't even be Live and Learn Jun 2016 #94
OK, in sum, that "simple search" turned up nothing. MADem Jun 2016 #117
Maybe you just can't see it when you do it. You certainly blame others for it when they aren't Live and Learn Jun 2016 #119
I can't see it because I don't do it--I simply do not name call. MADem Jun 2016 #121
Perception, I tell you. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #123
You can tell me all you want, but I just don't do it, and that 'simple search' could have been done MADem Jun 2016 #126
Don't bother, you obviously can't see it. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #128
Your entire post is BS...and I don't mean... tex-wyo-dem Jun 2016 #76
+1000 nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #80
There ya go--"Your entire post is BS" -- how charming. MADem Jun 2016 #82
Speaking ill of a post is not a personal attack. Live and Learn Jun 2016 #91
Calling a liberal Democrat a conservative was intended to insult. MADem Jun 2016 #103
She didn't call you a conservative at all. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #105
"...you are no better than a lot of my conservative acquaintances. " MADem Jun 2016 #124
Nope, quite a difference. And, here I thought you were a teacher. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #127
No, no difference. And I'm not a teacher--obviously you confuse me with someone else. MADem Jun 2016 #149
There you go again... tex-wyo-dem Jun 2016 #98
Annnnd a double down! nt MADem Jun 2016 #101
MAdem, I can't figure out why or how you pushed their buttons. AgadorSparticus Jun 2016 #104
I don't get it either. MADem Jun 2016 #107
Maybe it is just coming down to the wire and people are processing not just the loss AgadorSparticus Jun 2016 #111
You might be right! In fact, that is a likely explanation! MADem Jun 2016 #114
I was sleeping through all this and awoke Hortensis Jun 2016 #164
Our 'home' was rotting to the core any way. Moving on. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #130
You have more patience than me! WhiteTara Jun 2016 #180
"I see it over and over again--it's a pattern." Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #147
no it goes this way if you don't vote for Hillary then you're not a Democrat or a liberal azurnoir Jun 2016 #25
Enough is right. 840high Jun 2016 #33
Ditto dat. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #39
I resent me, a 63 year old woman being called sheshe2 Jun 2016 #43
One person used the term corporate whore - the physician who helped write the ACA & he jillan Jun 2016 #46
One? sheshe2 Jun 2016 #49
Right? LisaM Jun 2016 #54
Thanks LisaM. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #75
Right, and young women who supported Bernie were told... tex-wyo-dem Jun 2016 #66
+1000 nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #71
I never said that. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #78
You never said that, but Albright sure did tex-wyo-dem Jun 2016 #100
I recall many here calling Mitt a corporate whore and yet no complaints. Live and Learn Jun 2016 #72
MADem said nothing of the sort Hekate Jun 2016 #88
I think you MORE than qualify. InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2016 #160
Where did she say that? She didn't. Hortensis Jun 2016 #162
LOl. Never thought I'd see the day. Sanders and his supporters are not Democrat enough notadmblnd Jun 2016 #18
No one said that. Stop allowing bias to cloud your vision. MADem Jun 2016 #22
I may be bitter and angry. I can admit that and I can state many reasons why notadmblnd Jun 2016 #32
Because those who love the status quo know that Bernie started something that isn't over yet: Betty Karlson Jun 2016 #45
+10,000 nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #51
I think you're probably right. notadmblnd Jun 2016 #63
I don't know where or why you accuse me of that. I'm happy this nightmare is ending. MADem Jun 2016 #50
I disagree and that'll just have to be that. notadmblnd Jun 2016 #59
What do you mean no one said that?! tex-wyo-dem Jun 2016 #93
The disconnect with that is bizarre indeed. n/t JimDandy Jun 2016 #23
What's so Historic about this? I'm genuinely curious why so Exilednight Jun 2016 #155
We don't want status quo in the White House. Betty Karlson Jun 2016 #37
Bernie supporters likewise don't want Trump in W.H... Herman4747 Jun 2016 #172
Same here. I was a Clinton supporter. It stung to lose, but after a break, I got back with it. Lyric Jun 2016 #157
Hope people reconsider MFM008 Jun 2016 #4
Great but my question was about Obama in 2008. jillan Jun 2016 #5
I wasn't too close to the place, or the candidates, then, jillan. elleng Jun 2016 #9
I Cant tell you MFM008 Jun 2016 #92
Anything suggesting that he should lose or in favor of an alternative movement was quashed. Zynx Jun 2016 #7
Quite a distinction between 'constructive criticism' and 'concern trolling,' elleng Jun 2016 #12
Depends on how it's done. Zynx Jun 2016 #15
Concern trolling is, for example, posting about a new RW book against Hillary, pnwmom Jun 2016 #141
Not a new issue, elleng Jun 2016 #142
That would be an example of concern trolling at its lowest. pnwmom Jun 2016 #143
Here is what Skinner posted in 2008: JTFrog Jun 2016 #10
Thanks for this. There goes another conspiracy theory of things being different back then. grossproffit Jun 2016 #13
No problem. JTFrog Jun 2016 #17
Thanks for this - but it is different. We were allowed to criticize Obama back then - jillan Jun 2016 #31
I suggest you seek clarification in ATA. I think the guidelines are essentially the same. MADem Jun 2016 #52
How is it different? JTFrog Jun 2016 #109
Well done...thanks for taking the trouble to compile this. Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #150
That's what it comes down to. joshcryer Jun 2016 #154
Thank you for posting this DesertRat Jun 2016 #58
Apparently, this years Hillbots are far more fragile SheilaT Jun 2016 #11
The Terms of Service were in effect then. JohnnyRingo Jun 2016 #14
The attacks against her have, on average, been far worse than what was said about Lieberman. Zynx Jun 2016 #16
You're kidding right? Lazy Daisy Jun 2016 #87
I was here in 2008 and recall no gag orders issued. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2016 #21
You might want to refresh your memory at POST 10. nt MADem Jun 2016 #27
you are correct Cryptoad Jun 2016 #181
The rule then and now is that you cant trounce laserhaas Jun 2016 #26
No, we aren't in "uncharted" waters--Hillary is the presumptive nominee. MADem Jun 2016 #29
Presumps..assumps..are the mother of all..... laserhaas Jun 2016 #34
She will be nominated on the first ballot. If that's what you call "brokered" MADem Jun 2016 #40
so "brokered" jcgoldie Jun 2016 #115
You clearly have no idea what a brokered convention is. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #165
Clinton supporters are the minority here. joshcryer Jun 2016 #166
This is not GulfCoast66 Jun 2016 #44
There is not going to be a brokered Democratic convention. okasha Jun 2016 #176
I ignore negative posts about PRESIDENT Obama underthematrix Jun 2016 #28
Good for you laserhaas Jun 2016 #35
Obama never had anything to criticize, policy-wise, going into the nomination KeepItReal Jun 2016 #56
That's a big difference RobertEarl Jun 2016 #85
+10,000 nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #102
See post 109. n/t JTFrog Jun 2016 #169
That has always been part of the TOS here. nt tblue37 Jun 2016 #64
It's normal, and expected. Hekate Jun 2016 #81
Well, I've certainly been banned (unjustly, I believe) from the Obama room. PatrickforO Jun 2016 #96
You missed it. This is what happened then. n/t pnwmom Jun 2016 #140
Not really. There was no rule against being critical of his policies. Being critical of stated Bluenorthwest Jun 2016 #161
In 2008 most DUers had rose colored glasses. joshcryer Jun 2016 #168
It's in the TOS you agreed to when you joined the site BainsBane Jun 2016 #153
You sure do like to throw your little rule hammers around. It's my understanding that Clinton w4rma Jun 2016 #156
I don't think adhering to a system you agreed to when you joined is "throwing little rule hammers ar LanternWaste Jun 2016 #179
Maybe you don't remember it because sufrommich Jun 2016 #158
exactly. nt La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #170
What JTFrog posted liberal N proud Jun 2016 #163
Lol La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #167
+100 n/t. okieinpain Jun 2016 #173
I was here. I remember Skinner's carefully worded missive that constructive criticism LanternWaste Jun 2016 #175
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #178
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I was here in 2008. I sup...»Reply #10