Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Response to coyote (Original post)

Tick tock. nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #1
Skinner has no power outside of DU AgingAmerican Jun 2016 #9
Assange won't affect the elections at all. nt stevenleser Jun 2016 #38
And you know this how? AgingAmerican Jun 2016 #40
95% of voters don't know who he is and don't care. Nt stevenleser Jun 2016 #42
Irrelevant who has heard of him AgingAmerican Jun 2016 #44
Nope, its not irrelevant. What he says will never reach those folks. nt stevenleser Jun 2016 #46
Everyone knows what Wikileaks is AgingAmerican Jun 2016 #48
Nope, most folks don't and most folks don't care. nt stevenleser Jun 2016 #69
Including you? rateyes Jun 2016 #106
Wikileaks was only in the news for so long... Blanks Jun 2016 #152
Because the MSM is firmly under control? People will be kept in the dark? senz Jun 2016 #67
Because he never hacked her home server. Whatever he has is from government systems prone to being glennward Jun 2016 #113
lol! Segami Jun 2016 #68
Nobody knows Assange? That's why the Arab Spring never happened, I guess... leeroysphitz Jun 2016 #134
If he had anything important he would have already released it. n/t pnwmom Jun 2016 #43
Not necessarily, no. AgingAmerican Jun 2016 #45
He's milking the pre-publicity for all its worth. He wouldn't need to do that pnwmom Jun 2016 #49
Still waiting for teh "whitey" recording. woolldog Jun 2016 #62
This, just like with the FBI! scscholar Jun 2016 #97
Assange is not the FBI. He's an attention seeker. n/t pnwmom Jun 2016 #108
He's pretty good at what he does. Major Hogwash Jun 2016 #118
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Jun 2016 #64
I agree with much of your post Turin_C3PO Jun 2016 #76
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Jun 2016 #77
I agree with those points. Turin_C3PO Jun 2016 #79
Thanks rjsquirrel Jun 2016 #80
I need air freshener after that one... MrMickeysMom Jun 2016 #101
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Jun 2016 #111
Threat much? MrMickeysMom Jun 2016 #112
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Jun 2016 #114
Less than 24 hours remain. kstewart33 Jun 2016 #78
Life will go on AgingAmerican Jun 2016 #81
I guess then we will .. coco77 Jun 2016 #88
I imagine Skinner has an Administrative decision that is laserhaas Jun 2016 #87
This message was self-deleted by its author Alex4Martinez Jun 2016 #138
Man fighting extradition says man fighting extradition says what? Scurrilous Jun 2016 #2
It must not be good news for DotCom. When they start feeling sad, they start lashing out. randome Jun 2016 #7
extradition= must silence this individual at all costs- we cannot allow the truth swhisper1 Jun 2016 #20
The moment he selectively edited the "Collateral Murder" video, he lost all respect. randome Jun 2016 #24
heros? He is not a hero- he is an investigative journalist, a near extinct species swhisper1 Jun 2016 #58
Because he SAYS he's a journalist? So does James O'Keefe! randome Jun 2016 #66
It goes like this... Scurrilous Jun 2016 #52
The US has absolutly no right to extradite a foreign citizen who broke no laws swhisper1 Jun 2016 #54
Wikileaks already has a "Searchable Database" of Hillary's emails FreakinDJ Jun 2016 #3
These emails supposedly came from Guccifer 2.0 NWCorona Jun 2016 #15
of released e-mail. yes now they may have the others. Assange did not say it is dirt, that is Hilbot swhisper1 Jun 2016 #56
So if Assange has all this dirt.... Adrahil Jun 2016 #4
good point. cali Jun 2016 #12
Wikileaks usually does redactions. SpareribSP Jun 2016 #19
These were supposedly recently supplied to them. NWCorona Jun 2016 #16
duh- the primary is not over-its weeks away swhisper1 Jun 2016 #17
Now there's a "coup" in the USA underway? Zorro Jun 2016 #22
Assange is not a whistleblower. Adrahil Jun 2016 #23
sanders people have moved on swhisper1 Jun 2016 #25
Manning is not going to get released. And for good reason. Adrahil Jun 2016 #34
I guess we will know when we know. The unknowns we know cannot be known to civilians, for we know swhisper1 Jun 2016 #59
Not only that, but he never seems interested in exposing Russia. Wonder why? Metric System Jun 2016 #27
Russia isnt hiding their intent, and in other than major cities, they are still using typewriters swhisper1 Jun 2016 #60
No, he's not. He's a fence who gets other people to steal stuff for him. randome Jun 2016 #32
I don't think he has an agenda for the election Rosa Luxemburg Jun 2016 #26
You mean posts like this nuttiness? CorkySt.Clair Jun 2016 #35
why do you assume it is dirt? Truth isnt always dirt swhisper1 Jun 2016 #57
How many more times are you going to fall for the old "just you wait" routine? randome Jun 2016 #5
Every time Assange says it, these guys believe it. It's like Lucy and the football. Squinch Jun 2016 #29
LOL Scurrilous Jun 2016 #53
. Squinch Jun 2016 #100
It's tiresome, isn't it? NurseJackie Jun 2016 #144
I have nightmares about rapists too Loki Liesmith Jun 2016 #6
Didn't Washington make it illegal for Federal Employees to even look at WikiLeaks? Octafish Jun 2016 #8
Isn't Assange the accused rapist waiting out the statute of limitations in a safe haven? lapucelle Jun 2016 #10
criminality has to be proven, and both women have recanted swhisper1 Jun 2016 #18
SEE his high intelligence? randome Jun 2016 #31
I.m not discussing the allegations, do I have to repeat myself? swhisper1 Jun 2016 #33
You don't have to discuss the rape charges. lapucelle Jun 2016 #124
They have not recanted. And he is avoiding a trial -- that is fact. n/t pnwmom Jun 2016 #50
Gee. How come the Hill Haters never say that about Hillary? Hekate Jun 2016 #82
Isn't Clinton the woman who defended a rapist? VulgarPoet Jun 2016 #121
Only according to Trump surrogates and Sean Hannity. lapucelle Jun 2016 #122
It wasn't just Hannity and trump surrogates ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #129
Couch surfer says what? Scurrilous Jun 2016 #11
... SidDithers Jun 2016 #13
It's probably 88 gigs of random rantings about the British, the Swedish, Nye Bevan Jun 2016 #14
Two criminals making conspiratorial claims about Hillary mwrguy Jun 2016 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Jun 2016 #28
LOL. Fevered dreams of Brocialists redstateblues Jun 2016 #84
1 more day RandySF Jun 2016 #30
... DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #36
We sure have a lot of foreigners MFM008 Jun 2016 #37
we have alot of foreigners exposing the truths our own country keep from us swhisper1 Jun 2016 #70
Suuuuuure Hekate Jun 2016 #83
The country is not keeping these truths from you. lapucelle Jun 2016 #126
twisted talking heads are not valid sources of news, They speak corporate, not english swhisper1 Jun 2016 #150
It was irony. lapucelle Jun 2016 #154
I wonder what is the status is of the rape trials that Assange is avoiding? pnwmom Jun 2016 #39
It wasn't "legitimate" rape. randome Jun 2016 #41
the whole case is bogus, politically driven, Marianne Ny (chief prosecutor) is a laughing stock here AntiBank Jun 2016 #61
He is resisting going through a trial in Sweden. I tried reading your links pnwmom Jun 2016 #63
there is no trial, he has not even been charged AntiBank Jun 2016 #65
That is not true hack89 Jun 2016 #135
they have categorically stated that that is a possibility, they refuse to AntiBank Jun 2016 #136
Let me see the government's actual words please. nt hack89 Jun 2016 #137
here you go AntiBank Jun 2016 #142
It doesn't say what you think it says hack89 Jun 2016 #143
you are just flat out wrong (and you do not understand our government and judicial system here) AntiBank Jun 2016 #146
Sweden's Ministry of Justice appears to disagree with you hack89 Jun 2016 #147
Sweden's Ministry of Justice appears to disagree with you <<<<< show me AntiBank Jun 2016 #148
the Prime Minster can order Morgan Johansson, the Justitieminister (Head of the Ministry of Justice) AntiBank Jun 2016 #149
Using a virulent Holocaust denier as an Assange defender is classy. Really classy. nt msanthrope Jun 2016 #85
what are you talking about? what Holocaust denier? AntiBank Jun 2016 #89
What Holocaust denier? How about the Wikileaks employee and noted Holocaust denier msanthrope Jun 2016 #91
I didn't post shit about or by Israel Shamir, take your lunacy and conspiracy theories elsewhere AntiBank Jun 2016 #94
You most certainly did....the honeypot/CIA defense was originated, without a shred of msanthrope Jun 2016 #96
the possible honeypot nature is far from the central point to all of this, Snowden released docs AntiBank Jun 2016 #99
Be careful of that one. Major Hogwash Jun 2016 #119
Ironic you toss this out, as one of Assange's accusers worked for a Swedish group who brought in AntiBank Jun 2016 #109
So you finally used google? nt msanthrope Jun 2016 #115
To very good effect, I'd say. You got it handed to you. DisgustipatedinCA Jun 2016 #116
Actually, no.... the fact that the poster chooses to go after the victim is instructive. msanthrope Jun 2016 #120
Yes. That is what is being suggested. randome Jun 2016 #125
I am going after the entirety of all the events AntiBank Jun 2016 #131
No....you aren't. The fact that you repeated the narrative of a Wikileaks employee regarding the msanthrope Jun 2016 #139
no AntiBank Jun 2016 #140
It is you who used the story of a virulent Holocaust denier. It is you who suggested the msanthrope Jun 2016 #141
and its you who cherry pick any angle, first off by seizing AntiBank Jun 2016 #145
Racketeer says fugitive rapist will be Hillary's worst nightmare? Lord Magus Jun 2016 #47
Assange is not a rapist, you have very little understanding obviously of the case here in Sweden AntiBank Jun 2016 #73
For someone who lives in Sweden you don't seem to know how criminal investigations there work YoungDemCA Jun 2016 #103
because he is a target of an bogus, arbitrary investigation (the United Nations says so) AntiBank Jun 2016 #105
I'm sure Assange, like most rapists, does feel that the investigation is bogus YoungDemCA Jun 2016 #107
lol, still on with the smears, well goodbye to you, you dont even have the intelligence to put in AntiBank Jun 2016 #110
That's not what the report says. lapucelle Jun 2016 #127
No, it also says the case is arbitrary AntiBank Jun 2016 #132
Here is the US we call that waiting out the statute of limitations. lapucelle Jun 2016 #123
you are conflating issues AntiBank Jun 2016 #133
Why is going to try and penetrate her while she's sleeping? I'm MyNameGoesHere Jun 2016 #51
It's telling that Assange jumped bail. YoungDemCA Jun 2016 #55
The phrase you're looking for is: "a unique perspective on criminal justice". brooklynite Jun 2016 #71
he DID NOT jump bail, the case had been dropped when he left Sweden AntiBank Jun 2016 #75
Yes.....he did jump bail. That's why bail was forfeited by those who put it up in the UK. nt msanthrope Jun 2016 #86
I was referring to Swedish case, not the UK bail AntiBank Jun 2016 #90
Bail was never set in Sweden. But, he gets to go to jail in the UK for jumping bail, a crime msanthrope Jun 2016 #92
The Swedish government has said nothing of the sort. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #95
they refuse to offer a non extradition guarantee, and there possibly is a sealed indictment AntiBank Jun 2016 #98
It was dropped and then reopened. lapucelle Jun 2016 #128
I know this, thats was mentioned in my first posts AntiBank Jun 2016 #130
May the truth come out. May corruption have nowhere to hide. senz Jun 2016 #72
He better hurry. The year WhiteTara Jun 2016 #74
Tick tock! stevenleser Jun 2016 #93
The US cannot and has not charged Assange with anything. YoungDemCA Jun 2016 #102
Chances are... MrWendel Jun 2016 #104
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #117
Why doesn't this creep man up and surrender The_Casual_Observer Jun 2016 #151
Kim Dotcom: Who gives a shit what that thieving, objectivist fuck thinks? n/t Chan790 Jun 2016 #153
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Kim Dotcom: Julian Assang...»Reply #117