2016 Postmortem

AntiBank

(1,339 posts)

132. No, it also says the case is arbitrary

Reply to lapucelle (Reply #127)

Wed Jun 22, 2016, 12:35 AM

Jun 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

154 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Kim Dotcom: Julian Assange Will Be Hillary Clinton’s Worst Nightmare in 2016 [View all] coyote Jun 2016 OP

Tick tock. nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #1

Skinner has no power outside of DU AgingAmerican Jun 2016 #9

Assange won't affect the elections at all. nt stevenleser Jun 2016 #38

And you know this how? AgingAmerican Jun 2016 #40

95% of voters don't know who he is and don't care. Nt stevenleser Jun 2016 #42

Irrelevant who has heard of him AgingAmerican Jun 2016 #44

Nope, its not irrelevant. What he says will never reach those folks. nt stevenleser Jun 2016 #46

Everyone knows what Wikileaks is AgingAmerican Jun 2016 #48

Nope, most folks don't and most folks don't care. nt stevenleser Jun 2016 #69

Including you? rateyes Jun 2016 #106

Wikileaks was only in the news for so long... Blanks Jun 2016 #152

Because the MSM is firmly under control? People will be kept in the dark? senz Jun 2016 #67

Because he never hacked her home server. Whatever he has is from government systems prone to being glennward Jun 2016 #113

lol! Segami Jun 2016 #68

Nobody knows Assange? That's why the Arab Spring never happened, I guess... leeroysphitz Jun 2016 #134

If he had anything important he would have already released it. n/t pnwmom Jun 2016 #43

Not necessarily, no. AgingAmerican Jun 2016 #45

He's milking the pre-publicity for all its worth. He wouldn't need to do that pnwmom Jun 2016 #49

Still waiting for teh "whitey" recording. woolldog Jun 2016 #62

This, just like with the FBI! scscholar Jun 2016 #97

Assange is not the FBI. He's an attention seeker. n/t pnwmom Jun 2016 #108

He's pretty good at what he does. Major Hogwash Jun 2016 #118

This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Jun 2016 #64

I agree with much of your post Turin_C3PO Jun 2016 #76

This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Jun 2016 #77

I agree with those points. Turin_C3PO Jun 2016 #79

Thanks rjsquirrel Jun 2016 #80

I need air freshener after that one... MrMickeysMom Jun 2016 #101

This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Jun 2016 #111

Threat much? MrMickeysMom Jun 2016 #112

This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Jun 2016 #114

Less than 24 hours remain. kstewart33 Jun 2016 #78

Life will go on AgingAmerican Jun 2016 #81

I guess then we will .. coco77 Jun 2016 #88

I imagine Skinner has an Administrative decision that is laserhaas Jun 2016 #87

This message was self-deleted by its author Alex4Martinez Jun 2016 #138

Man fighting extradition says man fighting extradition says what? Scurrilous Jun 2016 #2

It must not be good news for DotCom. When they start feeling sad, they start lashing out. randome Jun 2016 #7

extradition= must silence this individual at all costs- we cannot allow the truth swhisper1 Jun 2016 #20

The moment he selectively edited the "Collateral Murder" video, he lost all respect. randome Jun 2016 #24

heros? He is not a hero- he is an investigative journalist, a near extinct species swhisper1 Jun 2016 #58

Because he SAYS he's a journalist? So does James O'Keefe! randome Jun 2016 #66

It goes like this... Scurrilous Jun 2016 #52

The US has absolutly no right to extradite a foreign citizen who broke no laws swhisper1 Jun 2016 #54

Wikileaks already has a "Searchable Database" of Hillary's emails FreakinDJ Jun 2016 #3

These emails supposedly came from Guccifer 2.0 NWCorona Jun 2016 #15

of released e-mail. yes now they may have the others. Assange did not say it is dirt, that is Hilbot swhisper1 Jun 2016 #56

So if Assange has all this dirt.... Adrahil Jun 2016 #4

good point. cali Jun 2016 #12

Wikileaks usually does redactions. SpareribSP Jun 2016 #19

These were supposedly recently supplied to them. NWCorona Jun 2016 #16

duh- the primary is not over-its weeks away swhisper1 Jun 2016 #17

Now there's a "coup" in the USA underway? Zorro Jun 2016 #22

Assange is not a whistleblower. Adrahil Jun 2016 #23

sanders people have moved on swhisper1 Jun 2016 #25

Manning is not going to get released. And for good reason. Adrahil Jun 2016 #34

I guess we will know when we know. The unknowns we know cannot be known to civilians, for we know swhisper1 Jun 2016 #59

Not only that, but he never seems interested in exposing Russia. Wonder why? Metric System Jun 2016 #27

Russia isnt hiding their intent, and in other than major cities, they are still using typewriters swhisper1 Jun 2016 #60

No, he's not. He's a fence who gets other people to steal stuff for him. randome Jun 2016 #32

I don't think he has an agenda for the election Rosa Luxemburg Jun 2016 #26

You mean posts like this nuttiness? CorkySt.Clair Jun 2016 #35

why do you assume it is dirt? Truth isnt always dirt swhisper1 Jun 2016 #57

How many more times are you going to fall for the old "just you wait" routine? randome Jun 2016 #5

Every time Assange says it, these guys believe it. It's like Lucy and the football. Squinch Jun 2016 #29

LOL Scurrilous Jun 2016 #53

. Squinch Jun 2016 #100

It's tiresome, isn't it? NurseJackie Jun 2016 #144

I have nightmares about rapists too Loki Liesmith Jun 2016 #6

Didn't Washington make it illegal for Federal Employees to even look at WikiLeaks? Octafish Jun 2016 #8

Isn't Assange the accused rapist waiting out the statute of limitations in a safe haven? lapucelle Jun 2016 #10

criminality has to be proven, and both women have recanted swhisper1 Jun 2016 #18

SEE his high intelligence? randome Jun 2016 #31

I.m not discussing the allegations, do I have to repeat myself? swhisper1 Jun 2016 #33

You don't have to discuss the rape charges. lapucelle Jun 2016 #124

They have not recanted. And he is avoiding a trial -- that is fact. n/t pnwmom Jun 2016 #50

Gee. How come the Hill Haters never say that about Hillary? Hekate Jun 2016 #82

Isn't Clinton the woman who defended a rapist? VulgarPoet Jun 2016 #121

Only according to Trump surrogates and Sean Hannity. lapucelle Jun 2016 #122

It wasn't just Hannity and trump surrogates ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #129

Couch surfer says what? Scurrilous Jun 2016 #11

... SidDithers Jun 2016 #13

It's probably 88 gigs of random rantings about the British, the Swedish, Nye Bevan Jun 2016 #14

Two criminals making conspiratorial claims about Hillary mwrguy Jun 2016 #21

This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Jun 2016 #28

LOL. Fevered dreams of Brocialists redstateblues Jun 2016 #84

1 more day RandySF Jun 2016 #30

... DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #36

We sure have a lot of foreigners MFM008 Jun 2016 #37

we have alot of foreigners exposing the truths our own country keep from us swhisper1 Jun 2016 #70

Suuuuuure Hekate Jun 2016 #83

The country is not keeping these truths from you. lapucelle Jun 2016 #126

twisted talking heads are not valid sources of news, They speak corporate, not english swhisper1 Jun 2016 #150

It was irony. lapucelle Jun 2016 #154

I wonder what is the status is of the rape trials that Assange is avoiding? pnwmom Jun 2016 #39

It wasn't "legitimate" rape. randome Jun 2016 #41

the whole case is bogus, politically driven, Marianne Ny (chief prosecutor) is a laughing stock here AntiBank Jun 2016 #61

He is resisting going through a trial in Sweden. I tried reading your links pnwmom Jun 2016 #63

there is no trial, he has not even been charged AntiBank Jun 2016 #65

That is not true hack89 Jun 2016 #135

they have categorically stated that that is a possibility, they refuse to AntiBank Jun 2016 #136

Let me see the government's actual words please. nt hack89 Jun 2016 #137

here you go AntiBank Jun 2016 #142

It doesn't say what you think it says hack89 Jun 2016 #143

you are just flat out wrong (and you do not understand our government and judicial system here) AntiBank Jun 2016 #146

Sweden's Ministry of Justice appears to disagree with you hack89 Jun 2016 #147

Sweden's Ministry of Justice appears to disagree with you <<<<< show me AntiBank Jun 2016 #148

the Prime Minster can order Morgan Johansson, the Justitieminister (Head of the Ministry of Justice) AntiBank Jun 2016 #149

Using a virulent Holocaust denier as an Assange defender is classy. Really classy. nt msanthrope Jun 2016 #85

what are you talking about? what Holocaust denier? AntiBank Jun 2016 #89

What Holocaust denier? How about the Wikileaks employee and noted Holocaust denier msanthrope Jun 2016 #91

I didn't post shit about or by Israel Shamir, take your lunacy and conspiracy theories elsewhere AntiBank Jun 2016 #94

You most certainly did....the honeypot/CIA defense was originated, without a shred of msanthrope Jun 2016 #96

the possible honeypot nature is far from the central point to all of this, Snowden released docs AntiBank Jun 2016 #99

Be careful of that one. Major Hogwash Jun 2016 #119

Ironic you toss this out, as one of Assange's accusers worked for a Swedish group who brought in AntiBank Jun 2016 #109

So you finally used google? nt msanthrope Jun 2016 #115

To very good effect, I'd say. You got it handed to you. DisgustipatedinCA Jun 2016 #116

Actually, no.... the fact that the poster chooses to go after the victim is instructive. msanthrope Jun 2016 #120

Yes. That is what is being suggested. randome Jun 2016 #125

I am going after the entirety of all the events AntiBank Jun 2016 #131

No....you aren't. The fact that you repeated the narrative of a Wikileaks employee regarding the msanthrope Jun 2016 #139

no AntiBank Jun 2016 #140

It is you who used the story of a virulent Holocaust denier. It is you who suggested the msanthrope Jun 2016 #141

and its you who cherry pick any angle, first off by seizing AntiBank Jun 2016 #145

Racketeer says fugitive rapist will be Hillary's worst nightmare? Lord Magus Jun 2016 #47

Assange is not a rapist, you have very little understanding obviously of the case here in Sweden AntiBank Jun 2016 #73

For someone who lives in Sweden you don't seem to know how criminal investigations there work YoungDemCA Jun 2016 #103

because he is a target of an bogus, arbitrary investigation (the United Nations says so) AntiBank Jun 2016 #105

I'm sure Assange, like most rapists, does feel that the investigation is bogus YoungDemCA Jun 2016 #107

lol, still on with the smears, well goodbye to you, you dont even have the intelligence to put in AntiBank Jun 2016 #110

That's not what the report says. lapucelle Jun 2016 #127

No, it also says the case is arbitrary AntiBank Jun 2016 #132

Here is the US we call that waiting out the statute of limitations. lapucelle Jun 2016 #123

you are conflating issues AntiBank Jun 2016 #133

Why is going to try and penetrate her while she's sleeping? I'm MyNameGoesHere Jun 2016 #51

It's telling that Assange jumped bail. YoungDemCA Jun 2016 #55

The phrase you're looking for is: "a unique perspective on criminal justice". brooklynite Jun 2016 #71

he DID NOT jump bail, the case had been dropped when he left Sweden AntiBank Jun 2016 #75

Yes.....he did jump bail. That's why bail was forfeited by those who put it up in the UK. nt msanthrope Jun 2016 #86

I was referring to Swedish case, not the UK bail AntiBank Jun 2016 #90

Bail was never set in Sweden. But, he gets to go to jail in the UK for jumping bail, a crime msanthrope Jun 2016 #92

The Swedish government has said nothing of the sort. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #95

they refuse to offer a non extradition guarantee, and there possibly is a sealed indictment AntiBank Jun 2016 #98

It was dropped and then reopened. lapucelle Jun 2016 #128

I know this, thats was mentioned in my first posts AntiBank Jun 2016 #130

May the truth come out. May corruption have nowhere to hide. senz Jun 2016 #72

He better hurry. The year WhiteTara Jun 2016 #74

Tick tock! stevenleser Jun 2016 #93

The US cannot and has not charged Assange with anything. YoungDemCA Jun 2016 #102

Chances are... MrWendel Jun 2016 #104

Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #117

Why doesn't this creep man up and surrender The_Casual_Observer Jun 2016 #151

Kim Dotcom: Who gives a shit what that thieving, objectivist fuck thinks? n/t Chan790 Jun 2016 #153