Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

ThoughtCriminal

(14,214 posts)

13. "Because I get to decide" is not a rational argument

Reply to SHRED (Original post)

Sun Aug 30, 2015, 02:13 PM

Aug 2015

She needs to understand that there are adults involved here.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

43 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Debbie Wasserman Schultz's lame response [View all] SHRED Aug 2015 OP

Well that's a nice little exclusive club they have there. L0oniX Aug 2015 #1

The raison d'etre of the DLC was elite control, the rebranding changed nothing HereSince1628 Aug 2015 #9

This is total bullshit. PassingFair Aug 2015 #2

I wonder what job DWS is looking for in a supposed Hillary cabinet...n/t monmouth4 Aug 2015 #3

Or at the Foundation, should the iceberg meet the ship. (nt) HappyPlace Aug 2015 #4

Well she was co chairman... SHRED Aug 2015 #5

Conflict of interest big time MissDeeds Aug 2015 #17

Maybe an ambassadorship. In a nice country, where they speak english Motown_Johnny Aug 2015 #11

Not sure relayerbob Aug 2015 #28

IOKIYAC (It's OK if you're a Clinton), apparently. SusanCalvin Aug 2015 #6

Debbi Wasserman Schulz, former national co-chair of the Hillary Clinton Campaign for President, Zorra Aug 2015 #7

Precisely SHRED Aug 2015 #8

The primary process has been tainted MissDeeds Aug 2015 #24

Translation: Motown_Johnny Aug 2015 #10

DWS is one of the major problems with the Republicrat Party. bvar22 Aug 2015 #12

She pulled the same shit in 2006 in Florida's then 5th district. Fuddnik Aug 2015 #22

keeping that in mind when the DNC calls for money. thanks bvar irisblue Aug 2015 #27

"Because I get to decide" is not a rational argument ThoughtCriminal Aug 2015 #13

Eerily similar beltanefauve Aug 2015 #19

+1 You nailed it. Enthusiast Aug 2015 #33

So find some resources, stage a debate, invite some folks. No one jtuck004 Aug 2015 #14

They can't SHRED Aug 2015 #18

They could agree to have their own debates, and let Hillary debate herself. Fuddnik Aug 2015 #23

So? Make a big sign. "Those are the corporate candidate debates over there, jtuck004 Aug 2015 #35

Is this the kind of Presidency Hillary offers? Geronimoe Aug 2015 #15

I am going to BOOOOOOOOOOO her so hard at the convention. fbc Aug 2015 #16

I'm the decider. Sounds familiar. nt Live and Learn Aug 2015 #20

DUMP THIS WOMAN. Ron Green Aug 2015 #21

And I thought all the giant clowns were on the GOP side . . . DrBulldog Aug 2015 #25

I haven't sent a penny to the DNC since Dean hasn't been in charge. mountain grammy Aug 2015 #26

I'm really disappointed in her. madaboutharry Aug 2015 #29

I can't stand DWS lobodons Aug 2015 #30

What about the exclusion rule? HassleCat Aug 2015 #31

Only if she and her 'handlers' permit, elleng Aug 2015 #36

I was thinking HassleCat Aug 2015 #42

Might do, not a 'debate,' elleng Aug 2015 #43

A regime change in the DNC would be nice Jack Rabbit Aug 2015 #32

Hillary Clinton doesn't want or need debates 1939 Aug 2015 #34

"Shut up," she explained. Scuba Aug 2015 #37

Moveon has a petition calling for her removal. wilsonbooks Aug 2015 #38

"That debate criteria has been negotiated" Babel_17 Aug 2015 #39

The DNC has forgotten whom they serve, as have most of the establishment Democrats. PatrickforO Aug 2015 #40

She is leading the Democratic party over the same cliff the Republicans have already fallen over randr Aug 2015 #41