2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Martin O'Malley's Comprehensive, Progressive Trade Policy [View all]Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Last edited Fri Oct 9, 2015, 04:12 PM - Edit history (1)
in GOP has not always been a given). He's been gone for a while now, but he was proud of voting for Truman, went home to the GOP to vote for Eisenhower -- who NOTABLY was quite progressive himself. He crossed the ballot again to vote for Johnson's progressivism and against Goldwater, then back for Nixon -- who NOTABLY also had many progressive policies.
So, on my FIL's behalf, you guys can't hijack HIS conservative progressivism either. As I explained, these terms have long-established meanings.
As for our Democratic Party candidates, OF COURSE they're all progressive. There almost is no such thing as a nonprogressive Democrat; I'm not sure what that would even be. In any case, how progressive is a matter of degree. Calling a democratic socialist progressive would be very redundant, of course, but Bernie is progressive strictly speaking.
So, you see, you can call legitimately yourself a strongly progressive whateveryouconsideryourself, as opposed to moderately or radically progressive, or socialist.
As for those who follow Bernie, they should just identify themselves as progressive democratic socialists. Again, the "progressive " would be redundant, but they seem to like the term and nobody'd care. After all, isn't it time his followers stood up proudly for what they support? He does.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):