Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PatrickforO

(15,254 posts)
5. In this case the 'fact checkers' are full of crap.
Tue Nov 17, 2015, 10:17 PM
Nov 2015

In the end, terrorism is about the have-nots and the haves. Period. Climate change is causing an increasing number of people to not have enough. People who don't have enough turn to violence to get what they need.

Consider the Somalis. They were peaceful farmers and fishers until big trawlers from Russia and Japan fished out their waters and drought dried up the crops. Then the problem was compounded by European corporations dumping toxic waste off their coast because it is cheaper to do that than dispose of it regularly.

Warlords rose up and the starving people followed them. They became pirates. The 'civilized' world considers this to be very bad, but it is the economic policies of the 'civilized' world that create people who commit acts of terror.

Climate change is going to create massive instability and yes, acts of terror, as it advances. Our military is certainly looking at it that way - here are several links suggesting a causal relationship between climate change and terror:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2014/11/14/does-our-military-know-something-we-dont-about-global-warming/ (interestingly, the Military Advisory Board study cited in this article has been removed...money must have changed hands somewhere)

http://www.newsweek.com/pentagon-report-us-military-considers-climate-change-immediate-threat-could-277155

http://www.techtimes.com/articles/73339/20150731/pentagon-report-concludes-that-climate-change-is-a-us-military-problem.htm

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»First Politifact and now ...»Reply #5