Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Hillary Supporters' strategy becomes clear [View all]LiberalArkie
(15,748 posts)7. And the results are-----
On Tue Nov 24, 2015, 12:17 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Hillary Supporters' strategy becomes clear
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251845083
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Divisive over the top attack on all DU Hillary supporters claiming they all "always" "distort" and "turn anything related to Bernie into something negative." This OP is just one big callout of DUers and whining about getting "something derogatory" posted about Bernie on a GDP thread.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Nov 24, 2015, 12:23 PM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Dear Alerter, you are the exact person the poster is talking about.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: another day, another alert from "primaries"...
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: The truth seems to hurt
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Not an anyone supporter right now, but do we really need this?
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No reason to hide this at all. It's right in keeping with the tone of GD
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
92 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The argument here is about who the candidate is that can bring voters to the polls and beat
JDPriestly
Nov 2015
#55
You forgot "Hope Bernie runs out of money and has to drop out before the convention." n/t
dogknob
Nov 2015
#2
All true. But the one thing they won't do is talk about issues. And the main they have failed to do
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#4
The other thing with polls is there are so many of them. Like this one eg, which shows
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#21
So you think your candidate is inevitable then? Well great keep on thinking that way
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#23
Confidence of winners. No need to go negative when your candidate is on her way to the White House.
Laser102
Nov 2015
#33
Ya know, I think if Clinton proposed those, the Republicans would still have to oppose them
jeff47
Nov 2015
#67
If a Republican votes for any Clinton-backed bill, they will lose their next primary.
jeff47
Nov 2015
#66
The guy talking about "cognitive dissonance" is calling others "condescending".
JoePhilly
Nov 2015
#49
After the kamikaze campaign Clinton ran in 2007/08, pay her fans no never mind.
AtomicKitten
Nov 2015
#82