Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

starroute

(12,977 posts)
15. So Kroll was formerly owned by AIG
Fri Dec 25, 2015, 12:51 AM
Dec 2015

Even leaving out the "insurance scam" stuff -- which is where the 9/11 truther claims come in -- the Kroll/AIG connection is extremely interesting. This may not amount to anything, since AIG sold Kroll in 2004, but it could be worth following up.

http://www.propublica.org/article/hillary-clinton-mixed-record-on-wall-street-tough-cut-it-out-talk

On Sept. 18, 2008, as the government grappled with collapsing markets, Clinton took to the Senate floor. “After years of laissez-faire policies for the middle class, the Bush administration has acted on behalf of Wall Street, with the largest and most significant Federal interventions in the history of our modern financial system,” she said. “The largest banks in the world could have closed-door meetings with the White House and the Federal Reserve and Treasury Department to discuss their bailout options, but millions of homeowners with mortgages worth more than their homes, or who are facing default and foreclosure, don’t have the same opportunity.”

A day before that speech, Clinton had quietly reached out to Paulson, Bush’s Treasury secretary, on behalf of some wealthy investors in AIG. The giant insurer had made bad bets on the mortgage market, couldn’t pay its debts and faced imminent collapse. Shareholders were poised to lose billions if the company went bankrupt or was taken over by the government.

A review of Paulson’s calendars shows that he and Clinton talked on Sept. 17 and 20. In his book about the financial crisis, Paulson mentions just the first conversation, saying that Clinton called on behalf of Mickey Kantor, a lawyer, who represented a group interested in staving off AIG’s imminent collapse. The group’s investment banker, according to news accounts at the time, was Roger Altman. Kantor and Altman are long-time friends of Hillary Clinton and served as senior officials in her husband’s administration. Altman headed a secret energy task force for Clinton when she was in the Senate.


http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2014/10/aig-bailout-trial-bombshell-paulson-rejected-chinese-offer.html

One last tidbit: notice how Hillary Clinton appeared to be doing a peculiar favor for a Republican administration? Mickey Kantor, who was fronting for the Middle Eastern investors, is a long-standing Clinton ally and a continuing major fundraiser for the Clintons. The fact that he was representing investors meant he was looking to broker a deal to get a fee. For a presumed multi-billion dollar investment at the level of fees JP Morgan was hoping to charge (5%), that could easily represent a nine-figure payday. One has to wonder whether if his firm, Mayer Brown, had landed such a big fee would have thanked Hillary Clinton for her help, say by writing a large check to the Clinton Foundation or throwing its muscle behind Hillary’s future campaigns.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Are ya'll still beating this dead conspiracy theory horse? leftofcool Dec 2015 #1
thanks for the kick grasswire Dec 2015 #3
And there is no disputing the fact ... NanceGreggs Dec 2015 #13
Using the same logic, bvf Dec 2015 #20
Not really analogous jberryhill Dec 2015 #34
Perhaps if you had read my post in its entirety bvf Dec 2015 #58
You're being alert-stalked. Just a heads up. nt ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2015 #62
Thanks. It figures. n/t bvf Dec 2015 #65
AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service Chathamization Dec 2015 #56
Thanks, Chathamization. bvf Dec 2015 #59
Responding to a post 2 minutes after it's posted isn't "kicking". George II Dec 2015 #46
How about.... daleanime Dec 2015 #51
Are you attempting to inform us that Kroll is partial? Sheepshank Dec 2015 #68
What The New Yorker said. Octafish Dec 2015 #37
Very Nice, This Choice is In Perfect Keeping With What The DNC, Wass Schultz AND Hillary Represent! CorporatistNation Dec 2015 #67
Ask Phil and Bill: UBS is into Wealth Management. Octafish Dec 2015 #69
Creative Speculation is thataway. NuclearDem Dec 2015 #2
thanks for the kick grasswire Dec 2015 #4
If you're completely unable to talk about what's being discussed, you could just admit it. DisgustipatedinCA Dec 2015 #6
Delusional 9/11 Truther nonsense is not "facts." NuclearDem Dec 2015 #7
Yes, but you're the one talking about delusional 9/11 stuff. DisgustipatedinCA Dec 2015 #8
"Just to let you know, I don't find you to be very compelling, interesting, or informed." NuclearDem Dec 2015 #10
Still, I gave my opinion, which is something I wanted to do. DisgustipatedinCA Dec 2015 #57
I don't even know how to respond to this level of hypocrisy. NuclearDem Dec 2015 #61
thank you nt grasswire Dec 2015 #12
Precisely. 99Forever Dec 2015 #22
There does not seem to have been a failure of WTC security on 9/11 jberryhill Dec 2015 #33
Right on time... MrMickeysMom Dec 2015 #39
I'm sorry, did I make some sort of personal comment? jberryhill Dec 2015 #43
Nothing's personal... MrMickeysMom Dec 2015 #48
Ah, I see jberryhill Dec 2015 #52
People in both buildings were told to stay in their offices after the first plane hit. Octafish Dec 2015 #40
Tell that to John O'Neill and 3,000 others. leveymg Dec 2015 #50
The easy way to avoid an actual discussion is to make ad hominem attacks. If you don't rhett o rick Dec 2015 #28
9/11 truthers are incapable of rational discussion. NuclearDem Dec 2015 #31
Once again if you don't agree with the message you call the messanger names in the hope of rhett o rick Dec 2015 #55
No, just calling a spade a spade. NuclearDem Dec 2015 #60
Yes I recognize that justifcation, "they deserved it." Not what a Democrat would say. nm rhett o rick Dec 2015 #64
Anything to refute the OP? Octafish Dec 2015 #38
You seriously expect people to take the word of a guy who claims that Tower 7 was mythology Dec 2015 #5
You have no words? Sure you do... MrMickeysMom Dec 2015 #41
But he's one of the funniest guys on tv... Ken Burch Dec 2015 #9
LOL JunkyardAngel83 Dec 2015 #23
Recommended. H2O Man Dec 2015 #11
Creative Speculation used to be a section shenmue Dec 2015 #14
So Kroll was formerly owned by AIG starroute Dec 2015 #15
there is a ton of dirt to be found on researching Kroll... grasswire Dec 2015 #29
starroute is TOPS! Octafish Dec 2015 #42
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Dec 2015 #16
Important information, thanks grasswire, K&R! haikugal Dec 2015 #17
K&R Scuba Dec 2015 #18
K&R Segami Dec 2015 #19
The very FACT that the DNC contracted Kroll should make us RUN to vote for Bernie. stillwaiting Dec 2015 #21
damn straight grasswire Dec 2015 #30
No Democratic Entity is doing biz with Kroll - the Third Way, DLC, DNC is. Ferd Berfel Dec 2015 #24
I doubt any company would be "independent" enough for the Sanders supporters Blue_Adept Dec 2015 #25
too many in the party are part of the rot in dc. dws and Hillary are among them Doctor_J Dec 2015 #26
Sleazy is as Sleazy does, bvar22 Dec 2015 #27
well said grasswire Dec 2015 #32
That is disturbing. bvar22 Dec 2015 #35
Kroll for a fixed history. Octafish Dec 2015 #36
I hope you have contacted the Bernie Sanders campaign. n/t tammywammy Dec 2015 #44
Is this the possible responses when the Audit Report does not Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #45
Isn't Sanders now a "Democratic entity"? He agreed to this audit. George II Dec 2015 #47
The DNC should call in a neutral investigation as a party entity... MrMickeysMom Dec 2015 #49
Repost on stuff I saw related to using Kroll as an auditor for this issue Jarqui Dec 2015 #53
So Sanders is exercising poor judgment in agreeing to use Kroll? Gothmog Dec 2015 #54
Sanders has likewise not discerned the "truth" of 9/11 jberryhill Dec 2015 #63
The truth as revealed by Phil Zelikow and Condescenda Rice? Octafish Dec 2015 #70
Heck, Bernie should get used to the RW attack dogs!!! Sancho Dec 2015 #66
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»NO Democratic Entity has ...»Reply #15