2016 Postmortem

bvf

(6,604 posts)

20. Using the same logic,

Fri Dec 25, 2015, 07:14 AM

Dec 2015

we can assume you're OK with cockfighting.

If you have any objection to it, you're sure taking your sweet time saying so.

There's a story (perhaps apocryphal), about James Carville offering $1000 to anyone in a meeting who would let him crack an egg on their head. After one meeting participant agreed, Carville handed over the $1000, and, without any comment or further action, immediately proceeded to the next item on the meeting's agenda.

If you don't get the point here, that's not very surprising at all.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

70 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

NO Democratic Entity has ANY business doing ANYTHING with KROLL [View all] grasswire Dec 2015 OP

Are ya'll still beating this dead conspiracy theory horse? leftofcool Dec 2015 #1

thanks for the kick grasswire Dec 2015 #3

And there is no disputing the fact ... NanceGreggs Dec 2015 #13

Using the same logic, bvf Dec 2015 #20

Not really analogous jberryhill Dec 2015 #34

Perhaps if you had read my post in its entirety bvf Dec 2015 #58

You're being alert-stalked. Just a heads up. nt ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2015 #62

Thanks. It figures. n/t bvf Dec 2015 #65

AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service Chathamization Dec 2015 #56

Thanks, Chathamization. bvf Dec 2015 #59

Responding to a post 2 minutes after it's posted isn't "kicking". George II Dec 2015 #46

How about.... daleanime Dec 2015 #51

Are you attempting to inform us that Kroll is partial? Sheepshank Dec 2015 #68

What The New Yorker said. Octafish Dec 2015 #37

Very Nice, This Choice is In Perfect Keeping With What The DNC, Wass Schultz AND Hillary Represent! CorporatistNation Dec 2015 #67

Ask Phil and Bill: UBS is into Wealth Management. Octafish Dec 2015 #69

Creative Speculation is thataway. NuclearDem Dec 2015 #2

thanks for the kick grasswire Dec 2015 #4

If you're completely unable to talk about what's being discussed, you could just admit it. DisgustipatedinCA Dec 2015 #6

Delusional 9/11 Truther nonsense is not "facts." NuclearDem Dec 2015 #7

Yes, but you're the one talking about delusional 9/11 stuff. DisgustipatedinCA Dec 2015 #8

"Just to let you know, I don't find you to be very compelling, interesting, or informed." NuclearDem Dec 2015 #10

Still, I gave my opinion, which is something I wanted to do. DisgustipatedinCA Dec 2015 #57

I don't even know how to respond to this level of hypocrisy. NuclearDem Dec 2015 #61

thank you nt grasswire Dec 2015 #12

Precisely. 99Forever Dec 2015 #22

There does not seem to have been a failure of WTC security on 9/11 jberryhill Dec 2015 #33

Right on time... MrMickeysMom Dec 2015 #39

I'm sorry, did I make some sort of personal comment? jberryhill Dec 2015 #43

Nothing's personal... MrMickeysMom Dec 2015 #48

Ah, I see jberryhill Dec 2015 #52

People in both buildings were told to stay in their offices after the first plane hit. Octafish Dec 2015 #40

Tell that to John O'Neill and 3,000 others. leveymg Dec 2015 #50

The easy way to avoid an actual discussion is to make ad hominem attacks. If you don't rhett o rick Dec 2015 #28

9/11 truthers are incapable of rational discussion. NuclearDem Dec 2015 #31

Once again if you don't agree with the message you call the messanger names in the hope of rhett o rick Dec 2015 #55

No, just calling a spade a spade. NuclearDem Dec 2015 #60

Yes I recognize that justifcation, "they deserved it." Not what a Democrat would say. nm rhett o rick Dec 2015 #64

Anything to refute the OP? Octafish Dec 2015 #38

You seriously expect people to take the word of a guy who claims that Tower 7 was mythology Dec 2015 #5

You have no words? Sure you do... MrMickeysMom Dec 2015 #41

But he's one of the funniest guys on tv... Ken Burch Dec 2015 #9

LOL JunkyardAngel83 Dec 2015 #23

Recommended. H2O Man Dec 2015 #11

Creative Speculation used to be a section shenmue Dec 2015 #14

So Kroll was formerly owned by AIG starroute Dec 2015 #15

there is a ton of dirt to be found on researching Kroll... grasswire Dec 2015 #29

starroute is TOPS! Octafish Dec 2015 #42

Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Dec 2015 #16

Important information, thanks grasswire, K&R! haikugal Dec 2015 #17

K&R Scuba Dec 2015 #18

K&R Segami Dec 2015 #19

The very FACT that the DNC contracted Kroll should make us RUN to vote for Bernie. stillwaiting Dec 2015 #21

damn straight grasswire Dec 2015 #30

No Democratic Entity is doing biz with Kroll - the Third Way, DLC, DNC is. Ferd Berfel Dec 2015 #24

I doubt any company would be "independent" enough for the Sanders supporters Blue_Adept Dec 2015 #25

too many in the party are part of the rot in dc. dws and Hillary are among them Doctor_J Dec 2015 #26

Sleazy is as Sleazy does, bvar22 Dec 2015 #27

well said grasswire Dec 2015 #32

That is disturbing. bvar22 Dec 2015 #35

Kroll for a fixed history. Octafish Dec 2015 #36

I hope you have contacted the Bernie Sanders campaign. n/t tammywammy Dec 2015 #44

Is this the possible responses when the Audit Report does not Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #45

Isn't Sanders now a "Democratic entity"? He agreed to this audit. George II Dec 2015 #47

The DNC should call in a neutral investigation as a party entity... MrMickeysMom Dec 2015 #49

Repost on stuff I saw related to using Kroll as an auditor for this issue Jarqui Dec 2015 #53

So Sanders is exercising poor judgment in agreeing to use Kroll? Gothmog Dec 2015 #54

Sanders has likewise not discerned the "truth" of 9/11 jberryhill Dec 2015 #63

The truth as revealed by Phil Zelikow and Condescenda Rice? Octafish Dec 2015 #70

Heck, Bernie should get used to the RW attack dogs!!! Sancho Dec 2015 #66