Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
History of Feminism
Showing Original Post only (View all)How Shaming’ Has Been Written Into School Dress Codes Across The Country [View all]
Last month, a New Jersey middle school banned girls from wearing strapless dresses to prom. Administrators claimed that the dresses were distracting though they refused to specify exactly how or why. Parents reacted strongly to the rule; some supported the dress code while others deemed it slut-shaming. On Friday, the school compromised by allowing girls to wear single-strap or see-through-strap dresses.
This is no isolated incident in the United States. Across the country, young girls are being told what not to wear because it might be a distraction for boys, or because adults decide it makes them look inappropriate. At its core, every incident has a common thread: Putting the onus on young women to prevent from being ogled or objectified, instead of teaching those responsible to learn to respect a womans body. Here are five other recent examples:
1. A middle school in California banned tight pants. At the beginning of last month, a middle school in Northern California began telling girls to avoid wearing pants that are too tight because it distracts the boys. At a mandatory assembly for just the female students, the middle school girls were told that theyre no longer allowed to wear leggings or yoga pants. We didnt think it was fair how we have all these restrictions on our clothing while boys didnt have to sit through [the assembly] at all, one student told local press. Some parents also complained, leading the schools assistant principal to record a voicemail explaining the new policy. The guiding principle in all dress codes is that the manner in which students dress does not become a distraction in the learning environment, the message said. . .
When most Americans think about rape culture, they may think about the Steubenville boys defense arguing that an unconscious girl consented to her sexual assault because she didnt say no, the school administrators who choose to protect their star athletes over those boys rape victims, or the bullying that led multiple victims of sexual assault to take their own lives. While those incidences of victim-blaming are certainly symptoms of a deeply-rooted rape culture in this country, theyre not the only examples of this dynamic at play. Rape culture is also evident in the attitudes that lead school administrators to treat young girls bodies as inherently distracting to the boys who simply cant control themselves. That approach to gender roles simply encourages our youth to assume that sexual crimes must have something to do with womens suggestive clothes or behavior, rather than teaching them that every individual is responsible for respecting others bodily autonomy.
This is no isolated incident in the United States. Across the country, young girls are being told what not to wear because it might be a distraction for boys, or because adults decide it makes them look inappropriate. At its core, every incident has a common thread: Putting the onus on young women to prevent from being ogled or objectified, instead of teaching those responsible to learn to respect a womans body. Here are five other recent examples:
1. A middle school in California banned tight pants. At the beginning of last month, a middle school in Northern California began telling girls to avoid wearing pants that are too tight because it distracts the boys. At a mandatory assembly for just the female students, the middle school girls were told that theyre no longer allowed to wear leggings or yoga pants. We didnt think it was fair how we have all these restrictions on our clothing while boys didnt have to sit through [the assembly] at all, one student told local press. Some parents also complained, leading the schools assistant principal to record a voicemail explaining the new policy. The guiding principle in all dress codes is that the manner in which students dress does not become a distraction in the learning environment, the message said. . .
When most Americans think about rape culture, they may think about the Steubenville boys defense arguing that an unconscious girl consented to her sexual assault because she didnt say no, the school administrators who choose to protect their star athletes over those boys rape victims, or the bullying that led multiple victims of sexual assault to take their own lives. While those incidences of victim-blaming are certainly symptoms of a deeply-rooted rape culture in this country, theyre not the only examples of this dynamic at play. Rape culture is also evident in the attitudes that lead school administrators to treat young girls bodies as inherently distracting to the boys who simply cant control themselves. That approach to gender roles simply encourages our youth to assume that sexual crimes must have something to do with womens suggestive clothes or behavior, rather than teaching them that every individual is responsible for respecting others bodily autonomy.
http://thinkprogress.org/health/2013/05/06/1969001/slut-shaming-dress-codes/
14 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

How Shaming’ Has Been Written Into School Dress Codes Across The Country [View all]
BainsBane
May 2013
OP
I agree, and where I have seen it done, it's just a list of what they are expected to
Squinch
May 2013
#9
"... teach boys not to objectify, girls to not feel as though they are group of body parts ..."
redqueen
May 2013
#8