Yet another book for my 'too read' list
The author of the article is outraged at the narrative of "The Harriet Tubman Sex Tape" and does bring up actual sexual assault;
Slavery was hell, Tubman described in her narrative, dictated to Sarah Bradford since she could neither read nor write. She experienced a great deal of trauma while enslaved, but if there were any experiences with rapewhich marked the experiences of far too many enslaved womenTubman remained silent on the issue. Its still also possible that, as hellish as her experience might have been, she was spared from a deeper hell that sexual violence brings to the picture. Which is why Simmons sex tape adds insult to injury.
Its a hell of a sobering reality to realize that, 100 years after Tubmans passing, our porn cultureintertwined inextricably with rape culturewould produce such a demeaning narrative about one of our great American heroes. It happened not because there is any basis in history for such an imagined scenario (Tubman simply would not engage in sexual leverageits not part of the essence of who she was) but because our culture continues to trivialize rape (which is what we must categorize any unequal encounter between a slaveowner and slave, regardless of consent) and debase womens experiences. Ironically, the horrendous truth about sex tapes is that they tend to be used as leverage not against men but against women! It is women who are often blackmailed or demeaned when sex tapes are made available on the Internet. Women are the ones who have everything to lose, considering the slut-shaming that still clings to female sexuality. Sure, some celebrities might parlay such porn videos into a career, but the intention of sex tapes is public humiliation.