Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

History of Feminism

Showing Original Post only (View all)

eridani

(51,907 posts)
Tue Feb 11, 2014, 02:55 AM Feb 2014

It's odd how managing the menfolk's sexytimes never turns into a movement [View all]

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/02/08/1275891/-It-s-odd-how-managing-the-menfolk-s-sexytimes-never-turns-into-a-movement

The federal Department of Health and Human Services dispatched its Office of Inspector General to review Medicare payments for vacuum erection systems, less formally known as penis pumps.


Certainly, there may certainly be individual wags out there who are miffed that their tax dollars are going for medical treatments to allow older people to have sex. There may be cranky folks who do not think that anyone should be getting Viagra for any reason, because if God wanted them to have an erection God would have taken care of that already.

But it's not a movement. You don't see a dozen conservative women all lined up in a row to testify to Congress that allowing men past childbearing age to have sex is an abomination unto their Lord, or nationwide hobby supply shops demanding that the entire national health care system be restructured to allow them to personally decide which of their male employees ought not to be receiving medical care for insufficient sexytimes.
Their religion may dictate that nobody have sex unless they are married, and unless they are fertile, but there is no nationwide, Fox-News-covered movement afoot to demand that the appropriate health care remedies be given only to married and fertile people. You don't hear the Fox News talking heads going on about that.
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
False equivalency Android3.14 Feb 2014 #1
Interesting that insurance companies NEVER covered birth control until eridani Feb 2014 #2
The attempts to restrict abortion are heavily based in religion. boston bean Feb 2014 #3
Not what I meant Android3.14 Feb 2014 #4
That was the point. There is no religious oppostion to ED treatments. boston bean Feb 2014 #5
But it isn't a point Android3.14 Feb 2014 #6
Because it exists for one biological sex and not the other is fair game, and a fair equivalency. boston bean Feb 2014 #7
Raised German Catholic Android3.14 Feb 2014 #8
What you are not understanding is that by rigidly controlling women's reproductive rights, Sheldon Cooper Feb 2014 #10
Part of your statement is true, but not the part that would weaken my argument. Android3.14 Feb 2014 #11
So you you're just here for a laugh? JTFrog Feb 2014 #12
Three people have tried to explain where you are wrong, and yet you still don't get it. Sheldon Cooper Feb 2014 #13
Unamused Android3.14 Feb 2014 #14
Your words: Sheldon Cooper Feb 2014 #15
And if I'd said Android3.14 Feb 2014 #16
i guess my argument would be more in tuned to.... viagra and pumps more for medical conditions seabeyond Feb 2014 #17
At last, I see something relevant: Sheldon Cooper Feb 2014 #18
Isn't that the 4th law of posting? JTFrog Feb 2014 #19
lol redqueen Feb 2014 #20
adn i didnt even read his posts but THIS... says who he is and what the fuck his agenda is. seabeyond Feb 2014 #22
you know what. if i am getting what you are saying, i am so damn tired of it. we have one, seabeyond Feb 2014 #21
Yep. Somehow the whole no sex unless it's for procreation rule is just ignored... but redqueen Feb 2014 #9
at least huskster acknowledge the female libido. i give him a huge ass thumbs up for that one. nt seabeyond Feb 2014 #23
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»It's odd how managing the...»Reply #0