Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

malthaussen

(18,155 posts)
21. But what if women and men really are "other" to one another?
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 12:53 PM
Feb 2014

Not "less than," that is absurd. But I occasionally play with the idea that there are in fact some biological or genetic differences that cast males and females into separate camps. The competition for alpha-status in the herd, for example, might well be different based on different instinctive assessments of "strength." Such distinction might even be necessary to ensure survival of the gene-pool. If I could actually formulate a coherent theory out of the idea, it might help explain why humans seem to be so wedded to the separation.

I have hopes that those of the rising generation who are not children of privilege are formulating a more equitable relation, but even if so, the children of privilege still rule the world and control the media, and thus define the discourse. And they have a vested interest in perpetuating the status quo. Thus it appears to me that a radical reworking of society is going to be required before there is any hope of anything approaching true equality in the "hearts and minds" of mankind. Legally the outlook is better, but eternal vigilance is necessary to counter the counter-revolution.

-- Mal



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

You obviously don't know art CT. sufrommich Feb 2014 #1
I know but I thought that examples would be the better teacher... CTyankee Feb 2014 #2
No, CT most definitely knows art. redqueen Feb 2014 #4
oh, I thought suffromich was being ironic...I don't think she meant it...so I am not at all CTyankee Feb 2014 #5
Oh heck. redqueen Feb 2014 #6
It happens to the best of us. sufrommich Feb 2014 #9
But it's you! redqueen Feb 2014 #11
Lol. nt sufrommich Feb 2014 #12
Lol,I was being ironic. sufrommich Feb 2014 #8
None of the three graces were posed in hypersexualized, unnatural ways. redqueen Feb 2014 #3
Yes, and my other point was how the view of women's bodies in great art changed over CTyankee Feb 2014 #7
Always our reality, distorted by the preferences of the male gaze. redqueen Feb 2014 #13
It's possible that's an understatement.:) malthaussen Feb 2014 #10
For me it's that one half of humanity is still setting the terms of the discussion. redqueen Feb 2014 #14
No argument there. malthaussen Feb 2014 #16
It does, and that's one reason I became a radical feminist. redqueen Feb 2014 #19
But what if women and men really are "other" to one another? malthaussen Feb 2014 #21
It would be fascinating to juxtapose the works of the great female artists of the same period... hlthe2b Feb 2014 #15
"Male perception?" malthaussen Feb 2014 #17
So, it is just fine and dandy to have men speak, express, and create the record for the women hlthe2b Feb 2014 #18
Didn't you just agree with this same assertion in post 14? nt redqueen Feb 2014 #20
Not exactly. malthaussen Feb 2014 #22
Women couldn't buy paint. KitSileya Feb 2014 #28
Didn't know those stats. malthaussen Feb 2014 #29
Oh, women have ALWAYS been artists! Yes, they are usually defined as "crafts" but art they certainly CTyankee Feb 2014 #24
Thanks, CTyankee... I knew there would be women creating in the background.... hlthe2b Feb 2014 #25
I guess my point is that they were only in the background of what is termed Fine Arts... CTyankee Feb 2014 #27
But that's why they were called "minor arts," no? malthaussen Feb 2014 #30
Of course! It's just terminology...art is art... CTyankee Feb 2014 #31
Interesting riff in the Cryptonomicon... malthaussen Feb 2014 #32
We talked about the renaissance a couple of weeks ago. KitSileya Feb 2014 #33
there is real blood in Artemisia's and also the look of determination is a lot CTyankee Feb 2014 #34
Nice ismnotwasm Feb 2014 #23
Really elleng Feb 2014 #26
Fascinating! JustAnotherGen Feb 2014 #35
glad you liked it. someone once termed this "the bloody crossroads of art and politics" and he/she CTyankee Feb 2014 #36
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»Botticelli, Rubens, Rapha...»Reply #21