Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MadrasT

(7,237 posts)
2. I am not sure how the ERA would fix that.
Wed Apr 23, 2014, 09:37 AM
Apr 2014
Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.


To me, it says the same thing as banning preferential treatment based on gender. You can't discriminate against women, but you also can't favor them.

If you added race and sexual preference to the ERA, it would seems to completely negate the possibility of affirmative action measures.

I am not arguing against affirmative action, I am just saying the ERA would also seem to make affirmative action impossible (if you expanded it to include race).

(What am I not understanding? Because I really don't know a damn thing about it.)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»The SCOTUS decision regar...»Reply #2