Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BainsBane

(56,274 posts)
19. Yes, and here it is
Tue Mar 19, 2013, 07:19 PM
Mar 2013
http://www.house.leg.state.mn.us/bills/billnum.asp?Billnumber=HF237&ls_year=88&session_year=2013&session_number=0

Here is the author's amendment.http://www.house.leg.state.mn.us/comm/docs/0H0237DE5.pdf

Summary of the author's amendment: http://www.house.leg.state.mn.us/comm/docs/0H0237DE5.pdf

Partial text of summary: "Article 1: Firearm Background Checks and Transfers
Overview
This article modifies a variety of provisions of firearms law relating to the transfer and purchase of pistols and semiautomatic military-style assault weapons and to eligibility criteria for possessing a firearm.


Information. Requires that an applicant for a permit to purchase must submit a government-issued photo ID. Also changes the current reference to the firearms eligibility statute (Minn. Stat. § 624.713) to state or federal law.

Grounds for disqualification. Requires a chief of police or sheriff to deny a permit to purchase application if the applicant is either ineligible to possess firearms or is determined to be a danger to self or others. Changes the current reference to the firearms eligibility statute (Minn. Stat. § 624.713) to state or federal law

Granting of permits. Authorizes a new $25 fee for a permit to purchase. Changes the current reference to the firearms eligibility statute (Minn. Stat. § 624.713) to state or federal law. Also provides that if a chief or sheriff is unable to verify the identification of any applicant, they may require the applicant to appear in-person to present a government-issued photo ID, in which case the seven-day waiting period is extended to 30 days. . . .

Transfers by or through licensed dealers only. Mandates that any transfer of a pistol or semi-automatic assault weapon between two private citizens, neither of whom is a federally licensed firearms dealer, must be routed through a dealer. The dealer may charge a fee of up to $25. The dealer must take the pistol or weapon into possession, and then follow federal requirements for transferring it to the intended buyer, including performance of an FBI background check through the NICS.
If unable to deliver it to the buyer, the dealer must run a background check on the seller, before returning it to the seller. If neither person is eligible to possess the pistol or weapon, the dealer must not transfer it to either the buyer or seller, and instead must transfer the firearm to the chief of police or sheriff within 24 hours, and report identifying information on the buyer and seller as directed.
Exempts auctioneers from the requirements of this section."

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Minnesota Action Alert! [View all] Robb Mar 2013 OP
Edit: see Minneapolis Star Tribune article below BainsBane Mar 2013 #1
More info from the Star-Tribune BainsBane Mar 2013 #2
There are strange divisions between the bills sarisataka Mar 2013 #3
Paymar's bill is the most comprehensive BainsBane Mar 2013 #4
You would like to see a toothless non-UBC bill become law? rdharma Mar 2013 #6
I believe I clearly stated sarisataka Mar 2013 #10
You prefer the one with UBC. rdharma Mar 2013 #13
Watching the news I found one issue with Paymar's bill sarisataka Mar 2013 #14
probably because of opposition from hunters BainsBane Mar 2013 #15
A fair amount of guns are traded pipoman Mar 2013 #21
UBC only applies to handguns and military style rifles rdharma Mar 2013 #16
That's how it is worded sarisataka Mar 2013 #18
Good point. Agreed, UBC should be 'universal' in types of weapons covered. freshwest Mar 2013 #20
Sorry for doubting you, sarisataka......... rdharma Mar 2013 #27
Nothing to forgive sarisataka Mar 2013 #28
Yes, and here it is BainsBane Mar 2013 #19
I called all of the committee members BainsBane Mar 2013 #5
Paymar's Bill is the only meaningful bill. rdharma Mar 2013 #7
that was my concern BainsBane Mar 2013 #8
Are these MN committee votes carried live....... rdharma Mar 2013 #9
via the internet BainsBane Mar 2013 #11
House Public Safety Finance & Policy Committe Live Feed 7pm CTZ rdharma Mar 2013 #12
My guess is that section 14.7a will have the most resistance. ManiacJoe Mar 2013 #17
Adjourned without a vote, rescheduled for Thursday. nt Robb Mar 2013 #22
Bad news BainsBane Mar 2013 #23
Completely worthless! rdharma Mar 2013 #24
It didn't come up for a vote BainsBane Mar 2013 #25
Political Calculation? rdharma Mar 2013 #26
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control Reform Activism»Minnesota Action Alert!»Reply #19