Welcome to DU!
    The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
    Join the community:
    Create a free account
    Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
    Become a Star Member
    Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
    All Forums
        Issue Forums
        Culture Forums
        Alliance Forums
        Region Forums
        Support Forums
        Help & Search
    
Populist Reform of the Democratic Party
Showing Original Post only (View all)Do Some Social Justice Advocates Go Too Far? [View all]
This is from an article from medium.com posted by Aristotelis Orginos. More at the link: 
https://medium.com/@aristoNYC/social-justice-bullies-the-authoritarianism-of-millennial-social-justice-6bdb5ad3c9d3 
Let me finally be abundantly, abundantly clear. Social justice and social justice advocacy is a good thing. To utilize ones education to solve social ills is an admirable goal. 
However,
 in attempting to solve pressing and important social issues, millennial social justice advocates are violently sabotaging genuine opportunities for progress by infecting a liberal political narrative with, ironically, hate. 
The version of millennial social justice advocacy  one that uses  Identity Politics to balkanize groups of people, engenders hatred between groups, willingly lies to push agendas, manipulates language to provide immunity from criticism, and that publicly shames anyone who remotely speaks some sort of dissent from the overarching narrative of the orthodoxy  is not admirable. It is deplorable. It appeals to the basest of human instincts: fear and hatred. It is not an enlightened or educated position to take. History will not look kindly on this Orwellian, authoritarian pervision of social justice  that has taken social media and millennials by storm over the past few years. 
But the fact of the matter is  anyone unwilling to engage in productive, open, mutually critical conversations with people they disagree with under the moral protection of liberalism and social justice are not liberals, are not social justice advocates, and are not social justice warriors; they are social justice bullies. 
Emphasis in bold added
This is an interesting article and not directed at anyone in DU.
						
							26 replies
							
								 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
					
                    
					
                     = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
					
                    
					
        
        I think it's more than that. I think it's used to promote an agenda.  The liberal agenda is
        rhett o rick
        Jun 2015
        #9
      
        
        Some people try to separate social justice from economic justice. This is wrong.
        rhett o rick
        Jun 2015
        #5
      
        
        The reason for that is obvious. It is in the interests of those in power to keep the people divided
        sabrina 1
        Jun 2015
        #8
      
        
        I don't know specifically about racism in the Third Way, but I believe the Plutocratic-Oligarchs
        rhett o rick
        Jun 2015
        #14
      
        
        But: It is harder to have social injustice in the face of economic justice, but it's NOT impossible.
        merrily
        Aug 2015
        #24