Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

stage left

(3,120 posts)
42. Corporations were not the allies mentioned in that post.
Sun Sep 27, 2015, 11:46 AM
Sep 2015

The allies proposed were the far left and the religious right who would establish maybe two or three states,or maybe only one, whose citizens would be under something resembling a theocracy. This would be done in order to field a candidate agreeable to both parties to defeat corporations at the expense of a few women, people of color, and gays who are supposed to submit quietly. Granted vouchers would be offered to people who wanted to leave said benighted state. But, somehow, I think that might turn out to be a problem especially for people of color.

I will grant you that this is a ridiculous little scenario he dreamed up in his spare time. It wouldn't affect him since he's a white straight male so he thinks it's a stellar idea. I'm a little disappointed that even one person here agreed that it had even a few workable parts and didn't mind the bigotry reflected in it.

I know corporations don't have a vote per se, but what they do have is a designation as "People"with the right to free speech which was given to them in Citizens United. And they can pour tons of money into the political process. Which they have done. In my opinion, that's trumped a lot of votes. The fact that they control the media hasn't helped, either.

I don't object to members of the religious right finally abandoning the dark side; not at all. I will welcome them into the light. What I object to is the suggestion that we abandon our principles in order to gain their support. They can vote,of course, for whomever they please. That is their right as citizens of the United States. If they vote for Bernie Sanders so much the better. At the rally here, I met a young guy who was voting mainly for the legalization of weed. A truly one issue voter, but hey, that's his right.

We fought a war sometime back to keep this country together Granted, my ancestors were fighting on the wrong side, for the wrong reasons. But I hope I've moved beyond them. I've tried. I don't think there's any reason good enough to justify splitting it apart again.

I would be interested in your issues with that post, if you would like to say what they are.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

A quote from the novel Dune sarge43 Sep 2015 #1
On second thought stage left Sep 2015 #6
I think you are barking up the wrong tree Demeter Sep 2015 #2
Did you just say the relgious right are really FDR Democrats? stage left Sep 2015 #4
I'm willing to bet you aren't even 30 yet. Demeter Sep 2015 #8
why thank you. stage left Sep 2015 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author HooptieWagon Sep 2015 #3
I don't think it was a good alert. HooptieWagon Sep 2015 #5
Ok. stage left Sep 2015 #10
Bernies not going to compromise... HooptieWagon Sep 2015 #17
The poster had a bad idea, but it wasn't worth an alert. Scootaloo Sep 2015 #7
I don't know. stage left Sep 2015 #16
I agree with you that the idea expressed in that OP for that thread was just ridiculous. JDPriestly Sep 2015 #36
There were only 5 recs, and no one that I recognized as a "regular" Bernie poster... mak3cats Sep 2015 #9
Of course we shouldn't ally with the religious right jfern Sep 2015 #11
I agree completely. stage left Sep 2015 #13
It's only a bad idea. Not alert material, imho jomin41 Sep 2015 #12
I don't want the perfect. I don't expect the perfect. stage left Sep 2015 #14
The morals of the real left and the morals of most of the religious (not the political right) are LiberalArkie Sep 2015 #18
The moral high ground would be sacrificing for others, shouldn't it? stage left Sep 2015 #20
When you look back to the 50's and even before, the Progressives had the Catholics, LiberalArkie Sep 2015 #22
Martin Luther King was a preacher. stage left Sep 2015 #24
I think Sanders would disagree vehemently with the notion that he should or would abandon the civil Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2015 #19
I don't believe he would either. stage left Sep 2015 #21
Some OPs are such train wrecks that you just stare, shake your head and move on sarge43 Sep 2015 #26
yeah stage left Sep 2015 #31
I have mainly been trying to stay out of the primary wars going on LostOne4Ever Sep 2015 #23
I've been trying to stay out of the primary wars, too. stage left Sep 2015 #25
This was my response to that OP ... JoePhilly Sep 2015 #27
And it was a great one. stage left Sep 2015 #30
It was a dumb post, but probably not worth your getting upset about it tularetom Sep 2015 #28
Thanks. stage left Sep 2015 #32
My opinion... malokvale77 Sep 2015 #29
Me, either. stage left Sep 2015 #33
Yes, they are all dangerous. malokvale77 Sep 2015 #34
campaign strategy restorefreedom Sep 2015 #35
Bigotry is not a viable campaign strategy. stage left Sep 2015 #37
unfortunately the name calling is not restorefreedom Sep 2015 #38
I have huge issues with that post marym625 Sep 2015 #39
I'm of the opinion that one rec of that vile post is two recs too many on DU nt LostOne4Ever Sep 2015 #40
not saying it should be rec'd marym625 Sep 2015 #41
+1nt stage left Sep 2015 #43
Corporations were not the allies mentioned in that post. stage left Sep 2015 #42
There is nothing in that post I don't take issue with. marym625 Sep 2015 #44
I'm not upset. stage left Sep 2015 #45
hmm marym625 Sep 2015 #46
Ok. stage left Sep 2015 #49
The title of the op was so ridiculous that I bypassed it. ReligiousReich IS corporate, LOL! Dont call me Shirley Sep 2015 #47
Probably a good choice. stage left Sep 2015 #50
If we don't focus on economics TBF Sep 2015 #48
I do see your point stage left Sep 2015 #52
Agree on "states rights" - TBF Sep 2015 #53
I think we're in agreement. stage left Sep 2015 #55
It's best to let such things die a natural death Doctor_J Sep 2015 #51
I'm glad to see so many opposed to such an idea. stage left Sep 2015 #56
idiotic post by someone who does not share Bernie's values. geek tragedy Sep 2015 #54
Yes. stage left Sep 2015 #57
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»What do my fellow Sander...»Reply #42