Democratic Primaries

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)

3. Ok. Look, foreign enemies AND domestic are trying to divide and conquer.

Fri Nov 1, 2019, 12:33 PM

Nov 2019

That's just the way it is. Last time they focused on Sanders as a splinter candidate and the rewards have been enormous. This time it's not Sanders alone as they develop what's developing.

Not only is there NO chance they wouldn't repeat this major strategy, but they never stopped. Thrilled celebratory parties in 2016 don't count as an interruption, they were raising toasts to 2020 at them also.

Hillary turned a needed light on the major tactics Russia and Iran, and no doubt coordinating with some of our own RW agents, have been developing all along.

Good, because ignorance and hiding our heads in the sand is NOT how we hand them all their own.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

47 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Not only is Gabbard 98+% likely to qualify for the November debate, but now she's only 2 polls short [View all] Celerity Oct 2019 OP

I was shocked at the few posters positing that her 3rd party run (if any) would not hurt Dems.... hlthe2b Oct 2019 #1

Polls can be influenced by ratfuckers. Blue_true Nov 2019 #24

This message was self-deleted by its author pinkstarburst Nov 2019 #2

Don the con showed The Mouth Nov 2019 #35

Ok. Look, foreign enemies AND domestic are trying to divide and conquer. Hortensis Nov 2019 #3

Welcome news! IndyinVirginny Nov 2019 #4

do you want her to run on the Green Party ticket? Celerity Nov 2019 #5

No! IndyinVirginny Nov 2019 #9

I see no path for Bernie to win, his ceiling is too low Celerity Nov 2019 #11

Don't you mean 'Democratic' nomination? n/t zackymilly Nov 2019 #12

Zackmilly IndyinVirginny Nov 2019 #14

You let us know who you are when you say Democrat Nomination Eliot Rosewater Nov 2019 #15

This guy keeps coming back with similar names pintobean Nov 2019 #28

"purple nurples" IronLionZion Nov 2019 #34

Whoops StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #32

DemocraTIC god DAMMIT Eliot Rosewater Nov 2019 #17

Uptight IndyinVirginny Nov 2019 #18

uh huh Eliot Rosewater Nov 2019 #19

I'm getting the same vibe BannonsLiver Nov 2019 #38

I'm not usually a person that nitpicks over grammar mistakes MustLoveBeagles Nov 2019 #21

Thanks IndyinVirginny Nov 2019 #22

Your welcome MustLoveBeagles Nov 2019 #27

Are you just funnin' with us? 🤣🤣 Karma13612 Nov 2019 #37

LOL MustLoveBeagles Nov 2019 #44

Irony alert..... killaphill Nov 2019 #40

You got me MustLoveBeagles Nov 2019 #45

You think it was a sincere mistake? I dont Eliot Rosewater Nov 2019 #23

I have no idea MustLoveBeagles Nov 2019 #26

Freudian? still_one Nov 2019 #29

It was a slip, not a mistake. StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #33

Exactly what is it about her that you find Karma13612 Nov 2019 #6

Tulsi IndyinVirginny Nov 2019 #13

uh huh Eliot Rosewater Nov 2019 #16

Although I don't agree Karma13612 Nov 2019 #36

Righhhhhht BannonsLiver Nov 2019 #39

Bowing to the Saudis? namahage Nov 2019 #47

I'm wondering about the logic Karma13612 Nov 2019 #7

Good question. Celerity Nov 2019 #8

Let her give Trump a blowjob on stage RhodeIslandOne Nov 2019 #10

According to the info I have, Gabbard may not make the Nov debate and is a long shot for Dec. Kaleva Nov 2019 #20

If Gabbard is a Russian asset get the evidence out and kick her out of the party. Aaron Pereira Nov 2019 #25

Ah, the "its all Hillary's fault" still_one Nov 2019 #30

The only major event that happened between Gabbard at zero qualifying polls and often at zero Celerity Nov 2019 #41

This is HILLARY'S fault? StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #31

It is not ant-Hillary talking points, it is simple observances of events from a linear perspective. Celerity Nov 2019 #42

Believe it or not IndyinVirginny Nov 2019 #43

Tulsi's been trashing Hillary for years StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #46