Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: How A 2005 Law to Prevent Bankruptcies Led to the 2008 Recession [View all]Celerity
(53,438 posts)16. I never said he was the sole reason, but he did help champions the 2005 Bill through congress
from the Democratic side. You also try to misrepresent the that Act by putting up ludicrous RW-framed examples, straight of the 'welfare-queen''style play book.
So nope, not buying what you are selling. The 2005 Act was disastrous for millions and an perfect example of the horrific side of bipartisanship when its is framed through a corporatist lens.
Legitimate bankruptcies still went through and are still going through.
Is a flat out falsehood.
to quote the article I linked to
In light of what occurred in its wake, this law is easily one of the most disgraceful aspects of the Bush and Biden legacies. The harm it did to middle-class Americans, especially during the crushing events of the recession four years later, is immeasurable. The bill made it nearly impossible for average families to file Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection, also known as "clean slate" bankruptcies intended to discharge nearly all debts, a matter of a few years before they'd need it the most. The bill instituted an all new means test to determine whether debtors with insurmountable financial hardships earned enough income to pay back all or part of their unsecured debts, specifically credit debt. If they earned too much, a clean slate bankruptcy became impossible, and they'd be forced to file Chapter 13, which would force debtors to pay back their debt over a five-year timeline, thus legalizing neo-indentured-servitude to creditors.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The article that I sited is an opinion piece, a very good one IMO with solid facts to back it.
CentralMass
Apr 2019
#6
That advice wasn't a singular message for your candidate of choice. Then again maybe it was.
CentralMass
Apr 2019
#11
Obama's words were a warning of rigid, doctrinaire progressiveness, you are positing a non sequitur
Celerity
Apr 2019
#13
I never said he was the sole reason, but he did help champions the 2005 Bill through congress
Celerity
Apr 2019
#16
The deregulation of banks during the Bush years and tax cuts, two wars....all
Demsrule86
Apr 2019
#41
like I said, keep on rolling with that tosh that the banks were victims and needed that law
Celerity
Apr 2019
#28
I have put up plenty of OP's defending policies, philosophies, issues, and candidates that I admire
Celerity
Apr 2019
#33
Bernie is not a Democrat. And was Warren in the Senate then? I do believe Ted Kennedy was
Demsrule86
Apr 2019
#39
So now that he touched my shoulder' didn't work, some attempt to blame him for the 2008
Demsrule86
Apr 2019
#38