Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
22. It's a trickle...
Sat Apr 6, 2019, 07:44 PM
Apr 2019

Reagan's economic agenda wasn't entirely felt until the late 80s, early 90s, when the US was plunged into recession well after his presidency had ended. it was delayed, though, since it's very unlikely legislation can take effect that quickly. The person who got the blame, though, was Bush - not Reagan - because his presidency had ended by that point.

That delay killed Bush's reelection chances. Ironically, though, that same delay is just as much prevalent in combating a recession as it is starting one. Bush broke his 'no new taxes' pledge early in his presidency as he compromised with Democrats and raised taxes, which some economists believed helped pull the US out of the recession. Except that was delayed, too, as Bush signed the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 in November, 1990, but the ending of the recession wasn't entirely realized, or at least felt, until three-to-four years later, when Clinton was already into his presidency, one he largely won because of economic conditions during the 1992 presidential election. Ironically, the recession actually technically ended in June, 1992. But the damage would carry for multiple years.

Legislation takes time. Especially something of this magnitude. The 2007 recession was built out of many things - the lack of overall growth coming out of the early 00s recession, the bubble economics that dominated the 90s and 00s, including the housing bubble and, of course, the subprime mortgage crisis. A great deal of the subprime mortgage crisis was due to housing prices dipping moderately in 2006 (shortly after this bill was signed) and higher interest rates (which is not tied to any of this), which made it impossible for many homeowners to refinance their houses. It's too simplistic to just point to one reason for the Great Recession. It was a perfect storm.

There was predatory lending. Overbuilding. Lack of regulation. Government relaxing rules so just about anyone could get a mortgage and buy a house.

But no, this bill didn't trigger the Great Recession. Had it never been signed, the recession still would have happened.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

this law did not receive enough attention when it passed rampartc Apr 2019 #1
That bill was a disaster for everyone-- shanny Apr 2019 #2
+10000 Celerity Apr 2019 #30
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #3
K&R workinclasszero Apr 2019 #4
The law didn't cause the recession BlueFlorida Apr 2019 #5
The article that I sited is an opinion piece, a very good one IMO with solid facts to back it. CentralMass Apr 2019 #6
It is from a supporter's blog BlueFlorida Apr 2019 #7
Well it has some basic facts that are very true. However explain to me CentralMass Apr 2019 #8
Restricting bankruptcy by laws doesn't cause recessions BlueFlorida Apr 2019 #14
Your candidate does not benefit from this sort of thing. Demsrule86 Apr 2019 #42
Obviously you didn't listen to Obama's words today Laura PourMeADrink Apr 2019 #9
That advice wasn't a singular message for your candidate of choice. Then again maybe it was. CentralMass Apr 2019 #11
Obama's words were a warning of rigid, doctrinaire progressiveness, you are positing a non sequitur Celerity Apr 2019 #13
It is the height of unfairness to pin any of those on Biden BlueFlorida Apr 2019 #15
I never said he was the sole reason, but he did help champions the 2005 Bill through congress Celerity Apr 2019 #16
The deregulation of banks during the Bush years and tax cuts, two wars....all Demsrule86 Apr 2019 #41
The question is crazytown Apr 2019 #20
Why would he have vetoed it? He thought is was the correct move. Celerity Apr 2019 #21
Like Biden said, it affected 10% of the population. It's Laura PourMeADrink Apr 2019 #24
that literally makes zeros sense Celerity Apr 2019 #25
Bullshit. It is naive to the nth degree that most all banks Laura PourMeADrink Apr 2019 #26
like I said, keep on rolling with that tosh that the banks were victims and needed that law Celerity Apr 2019 #28
Blah, blah, blah. Volume of words does not make Laura PourMeADrink Apr 2019 #31
I have put up plenty of OP's defending policies, philosophies, issues, and candidates that I admire Celerity Apr 2019 #33
Great!!! Laura PourMeADrink Apr 2019 #35
It is painfully obvious what your motivation may be. Why not tout Demsrule86 Apr 2019 #40
Obama's words had nothing do do with this KayF Apr 2019 #18
Bottom Line: Sanders And Warren Vehemently Opposed It (n/t) corbettkroehler Apr 2019 #10
Bernie is not a Democrat. And was Warren in the Senate then? I do believe Ted Kennedy was Demsrule86 Apr 2019 #39
At That Time, Warren Was A Recognized Public Figure corbettkroehler Apr 2019 #44
This is disingenuous at best. Drunken Irishman Apr 2019 #12
This is probably a new communique from some mothership BlueFlorida Apr 2019 #17
Love you BF Laura PourMeADrink Apr 2019 #27
that seems like a short time KayF Apr 2019 #19
It's a trickle... Drunken Irishman Apr 2019 #22
sorry I misread your post KayF Apr 2019 #23
The Cause Behind the '08 Financial Crisis.. LovingA2andMI Apr 2019 #29
And it wasn't all banks for sure. Laura PourMeADrink Apr 2019 #32
Extremely flawed and poor analysis. WeekiWater Apr 2019 #34
Only in Sirotaville. ucrdem Apr 2019 #36
I've never forgotten who voted for it. 50 Shades Of Blue Apr 2019 #37
So now that he touched my shoulder' didn't work, some attempt to blame him for the 2008 Demsrule86 Apr 2019 #38
Don't you think that this is just a bit reductionist? yardwork Apr 2019 #43
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»How A 2005 Law to Prevent...»Reply #22