|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
swag
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 09:20 PM Original message |
No Final Report Seen in Inquiry on C.I.A. Leak |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pfitz59
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 09:22 PM Response to Original message |
1. Indictments! TREASON in time of War! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moc
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 09:24 PM Response to Original message |
2. "not expected to take any action in the case this week" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
swag
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 09:25 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. More time for your champagne to chill, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
journalist3072
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 09:26 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. I know....I'm so anxious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grytpype
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 09:32 PM Response to Reply #2 |
12. Looks like Fitzmas is coming late this year... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Halliburton
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 09:50 PM Response to Reply #2 |
18. I don't mind that much as long as new info keeps coming out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VegasWolf
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 10:33 PM Response to Reply #2 |
34. Yeah, but just think of the pressure cooker Bush and the WH are under |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tight_rope
![]() |
Wed Oct-19-05 09:22 AM Response to Reply #34 |
70. ROTFLMBAO...Now that you put it that way...I guess I can wait! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon
![]() |
Wed Oct-19-05 12:45 AM Response to Reply #2 |
56. Fitzgerald holds his cards close |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 09:25 PM Response to Original message |
3. Patrick, you are such a tease. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OldLeftieLawyer
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 09:27 PM Response to Original message |
6. This is just more bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 09:43 PM Response to Reply #6 |
15. Thank you Lefty. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
swag
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 09:47 PM Response to Reply #6 |
16. Thanks. Code of Federal Regulations certainly seems to agree with you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hang a left
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 10:43 PM Response to Reply #6 |
40. Would he be compelled to if called by Congress? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OldLeftieLawyer
![]() |
Wed Oct-19-05 07:24 AM Response to Reply #40 |
64. No one knows anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon
![]() |
Wed Oct-19-05 12:52 AM Response to Reply #6 |
57. You know what though? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OldLeftieLawyer
![]() |
Wed Oct-19-05 07:26 AM Response to Reply #57 |
65. I respectfully disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon
![]() |
Wed Oct-19-05 04:11 PM Response to Reply #65 |
74. First off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OldLeftieLawyer
![]() |
Wed Oct-19-05 04:31 PM Response to Reply #74 |
75. Any publicity? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon
![]() |
Wed Oct-19-05 04:49 PM Response to Reply #75 |
76. Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OldLeftieLawyer
![]() |
Wed Oct-19-05 04:56 PM Response to Reply #76 |
77. I was a first-year law student |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Wed Oct-19-05 08:22 AM Response to Reply #6 |
68. The problem is, Patrick Fitzgerald ran this investigation by the book |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OldLeftieLawyer
![]() |
Wed Oct-19-05 08:49 AM Response to Reply #68 |
69. Leaks are valid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rose Siding
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 09:27 PM Response to Original message |
7. Without indictments he'd HAVE to make a final report |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stepnw1f
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 09:29 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. meaning? (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
journalist3072
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 09:30 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Indictment Day is coming!!!!!!!! eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peterh
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 09:54 PM Response to Reply #9 |
21. Not necessarily…. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
journalist3072
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 09:59 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. But Mr. Torture man... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OldLeftieLawyer
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 10:04 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. Right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yodermon
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 10:21 PM Response to Reply #27 |
32. hypothetical question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OldLeftieLawyer
![]() |
Wed Oct-19-05 07:23 AM Response to Reply #32 |
63. It's the court's call - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename
![]() |
Wed Oct-19-05 12:01 PM Response to Reply #63 |
73. They would only overthrow the judicial if a person is brain dead. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peterh
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 10:13 PM Response to Reply #23 |
30. Negative… |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
journalist3072
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 10:43 PM Response to Reply #30 |
39. That doesn't make sense to me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peterh
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 10:58 PM Response to Reply #39 |
44. Wrong… |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hang a left
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 10:47 PM Response to Reply #30 |
41. I don't know who he has to submit to but it is not Gonzales. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peterh
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 11:04 PM Response to Reply #41 |
46. If you can show me where that is fact… |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hang a left
![]() |
Wed Oct-19-05 12:35 AM Response to Reply #46 |
55. Which part? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peterh
![]() |
Wed Oct-19-05 12:54 AM Response to Reply #55 |
58. Fitz is a special prosecutor….different from independent… |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hang a left
![]() |
Wed Oct-19-05 01:01 AM Response to Reply #58 |
59. No he does not, this thread tells you all about it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peterh
![]() |
Wed Oct-19-05 01:27 AM Response to Reply #59 |
61. I stand corrected….. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hang a left
![]() |
Wed Oct-19-05 01:06 AM Response to Reply #58 |
60. I am happy too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 10:59 PM Response to Reply #30 |
45. well, I have heard that the grand jury meets MWF--so a few more days |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donailin
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 11:10 PM Response to Reply #30 |
47. Gonzalez; dejavu all over again??. sat night massacre |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peterh
![]() |
Wed Oct-19-05 12:02 AM Response to Reply #47 |
51. It will be interesting to see what comes out of this…. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 11:59 PM Response to Reply #30 |
50. Your wrong: Fitz reports to THE DEPUTY AG who is not Gonz. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peterh
![]() |
Wed Oct-19-05 12:23 AM Response to Reply #50 |
53. Uhhh…not likely….Flanigan withdrew… |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel
![]() |
Wed Oct-19-05 12:29 AM Response to Reply #53 |
54. Fitz doesn't report to Gonz. PERIOD |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grytpype
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 09:33 PM Response to Reply #7 |
14. no.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rose Siding
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 09:58 PM Response to Reply #14 |
22. I see. I thought Congress requested a report, but maybe that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grytpype
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 10:08 PM Response to Reply #22 |
28. No, because of grand jury secrecy requirements. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 10:42 PM Response to Reply #22 |
38. Democrats had requested a writtened detailed report if no indictments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
milkyway
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 09:30 PM Response to Original message |
10. Check out the out-of-nowhere last line of the article: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 09:33 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Why do I think Hannah has gotten a courtesy call |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patsy Stone
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 10:36 PM Response to Reply #10 |
36. I caught that too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 09:31 PM Response to Original message |
11. This bit is interesting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goforit
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 09:53 PM Response to Reply #11 |
20. Yes!!!...we the people deserve a full account! even if it includes mihop! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 10:11 PM Response to Reply #20 |
29. We'll have to see how this plays out, and then, if Congress does not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goforit
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 09:48 PM Response to Original message |
17. Would if he chooses not to hand out indictments at all? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Wed Oct-19-05 01:38 AM Response to Reply #17 |
62. Please. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 09:52 PM Response to Original message |
19. Hello Whitehouse Indictments are coming!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 10:01 PM Response to Original message |
24. No Final Report Seen in Inquiry on C.I.A. Leak |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndyOp
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 10:01 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Why isn't there an emoticon for ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tiggeroshii
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 10:01 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Just ten more days and we'll know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stand and Fight
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 10:20 PM Response to Original message |
31. Wow, wow, wow! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gloria
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 10:28 PM Response to Original message |
33. Didn't Conyers and a few other Dems request a report a few days ago? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demobrat
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 10:37 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. Yes, that's right, they did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patsy Stone
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 10:35 PM Response to Original message |
35. And, still, nothing new. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 10:48 PM Response to Reply #35 |
42. drats I was looking forward to a report (AND indictments). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patsy Stone
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 10:50 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. Well, if there are indictments you won't need a report |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jamesinca
![]() |
Wed Oct-19-05 08:18 AM Response to Reply #43 |
67. win or lose, we booze |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patsy Stone
![]() |
Wed Oct-19-05 10:02 AM Response to Reply #67 |
71. Absolutely! We're gonna need it no matter what. :) n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
electron_blue
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 11:25 PM Response to Original message |
48. hmmmm, well if there are no indictments, I'd be ticked to not get |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kostya
![]() |
Wed Oct-19-05 12:16 AM Response to Reply #48 |
52. Sorry, but that's the way it works. That's why when I read |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange
![]() |
Tue Oct-18-05 11:50 PM Response to Original message |
49. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
savemefromdumbya
![]() |
Wed Oct-19-05 07:48 AM Response to Original message |
66. I hope that you are right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nolabels
![]() |
Wed Oct-19-05 10:28 AM Response to Reply #66 |
72. Say that twice and then over and over again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun 15th 2024, 10:59 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC