|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
unblock
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 01:27 PM Original message |
Accidental Invention Points to End of Light Bulbs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 01:34 PM Response to Original message |
1. This is so cool |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straight Shooter
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
2. This is great! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 01:40 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. "what the bleep do we know" -- thanks, hadn't heard about this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straight Shooter
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 01:56 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. Great movie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wrinkle_In_Time
![]() |
Sun Oct-23-05 05:52 PM Response to Reply #5 |
66. "What the bleep..." is entertaining, but not related to this discovery |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
3. very cool! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nickgutierrez
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
4. Whoa |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 01:42 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. One vision |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nickgutierrez
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 01:48 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. How's this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straight Shooter
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 01:58 PM Response to Reply #6 |
17. Think about the medical field. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kablooie
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 01:44 PM Response to Original message |
7. This is really great! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 01:58 PM Response to Reply #7 |
16. lol! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fla Dem
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 01:47 PM Response to Original message |
8. Sowould this put lamp maufactures out of business, as well as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ozone_man
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 05:29 PM Response to Reply #8 |
47. Not lamp manufacturers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OffWithTheirHeads
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
10. How long before G.E. and Westinghouse pay Tom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 02:00 PM Response to Reply #10 |
18. g.e. would be the first in line to produce these |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellenfl
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 02:41 PM Response to Reply #10 |
22. that was my 1st thought. this may never see the light of day (sorry!) eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EuroObserver
![]() |
Sun Oct-23-05 05:40 AM Response to Reply #10 |
57. Yeah. Hmmm. Where to invest in shares in this? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
11. WOW!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 01:56 PM Response to Original message |
13. interesting.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Opusnone
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 01:58 PM Response to Original message |
14. Nanotechnology makes me happy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lilith Velkor
![]() |
Sun Oct-23-05 05:38 PM Response to Reply #14 |
65. me too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Endangered Specie
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 01:58 PM Response to Original message |
15. This is a hell of a breakthrough... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spinzonner
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
19. The beginning of the end of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Akoto
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 02:30 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Nah, it'll just take on a different form. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 02:23 PM Response to Original message |
20. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
23. We put LED lighting in our front living room about 4 years ago. Lights |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 03:26 PM Response to Reply #23 |
29. What's the electricity consumption like? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 03:40 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Hubby says really minimal, a couple of watts. Price reflects when |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sakabatou
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
24. Wow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
formercia
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 03:10 PM Response to Original message |
25. Halliburton will buy the patent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
olddad56
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 04:28 PM Response to Reply #25 |
41. more likely to steal the patent, They alrsady stole the Oval office. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anitar1
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
26. I really like this! am enjoying my new flashlight. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
27. This is design by intelligence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kailassa
![]() |
Sun Oct-23-05 09:40 AM Response to Reply #27 |
58. Pehaps what you should be pointing out to them is that ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise
![]() |
Sun Oct-23-05 02:08 PM Response to Reply #58 |
62. True but this was as a result of other |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 03:22 PM Response to Original message |
28. Questions for anyone who understands this better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nookiemonster
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 03:30 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. Good question regarding the flourescents. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bloodblister Bob
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 07:06 PM Response to Reply #30 |
53. They'll get my incandescent bulbs... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 03:45 PM Response to Reply #28 |
32. LED used much lower energy than florescent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 04:01 PM Response to Reply #32 |
37. Wikipedia (yes, I know, it's not completely reliable) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 04:03 PM Response to Reply #28 |
38. I wondered about the same - but concluded cost of making and ease of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salvorhardin
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 04:18 PM Response to Reply #28 |
39. A much better article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 05:39 PM Response to Reply #39 |
48. Thanks - that does explain it better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian
![]() |
Sun Oct-23-05 09:55 AM Response to Reply #28 |
60. LED's are far more efficient than fluorescents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler
![]() |
Sun Oct-23-05 12:13 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. Have you got some figures for that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WHAT
![]() |
Sun Oct-23-05 04:15 PM Response to Reply #61 |
64. that would be good... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalEsto
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 03:48 PM Response to Original message |
33. How many corporations will it take to screw |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GarySeven
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 03:51 PM Response to Original message |
34. I detect the work of a TIME TRAVELLER |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 03:59 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. That's 'nuclear wessel', isn't it? (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buns_of_Fire
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 04:25 PM Response to Reply #34 |
40. You got it. So long, and thanks for all the fish... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Porcupine
![]() |
Sun Oct-23-05 03:14 PM Response to Reply #34 |
63. Transparent alumina already sold. Scotty's selling out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
36. Very neat-and important - find -it affects energy need and the environment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skids
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 04:36 PM Response to Original message |
42. Ah, but can the quantum dots be used for these? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 07:00 PM Response to Reply #42 |
51. Nanotech is not my field |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AirAmFan
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 04:36 PM Response to Original message |
43. "Brilliant work." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prisoner_Number_Six
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 04:53 PM Response to Original message |
44. Is there still time for this to be quashed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 05:11 PM Response to Original message |
45. What I want to know is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fleabert
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
46. that. is. BAD. ASS. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VegasWolf
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 05:43 PM Response to Original message |
49. This cannot be tolerated!!!! This is not in the bible! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Miss Chybil
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 06:22 PM Response to Original message |
50. Yowzers! Way cool. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taxloss
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 07:04 PM Response to Original message |
52. Fascinating! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mom cat
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 07:14 PM Response to Original message |
54. Just curious as to whether there is any toxic effects in the manufacture |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 09:15 PM Response to Original message |
55. Rock on! Paint your ceiling with that shit and "look ma, no wires!" n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddysmellgood
![]() |
Sat Oct-22-05 10:22 PM Response to Original message |
56. Very cool. We are entering a new age of discovery. Not only will we be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NIGHT TRIPPER
![]() |
Sun Oct-23-05 07:06 PM Response to Reply #56 |
67. pointless if our planet of six billion people is destroyed through neglect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian
![]() |
Sun Oct-23-05 09:43 AM Response to Original message |
59. The Light Bulb Lobby is not going to like this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 16th 2024, 07:23 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC