|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
WillyT
![]() |
Wed Oct-29-03 07:31 AM Original message |
Bush: Didn't Sign Off On It (Newsday) *Oh, Please* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0007
![]() |
Wed Oct-29-03 07:35 AM Response to Original message |
1. Tawana Brawley case has more credibility! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman
![]() |
Wed Oct-29-03 08:00 AM Response to Reply #1 |
8. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CO Liberal
![]() |
Thu Oct-30-03 04:17 PM Response to Reply #1 |
49. OJ Simpson Has More Credibility Than The Bush Administration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bob3
![]() |
Wed Oct-29-03 07:36 AM Response to Original message |
2. Pull the other one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
remfan
![]() |
Wed Oct-29-03 07:38 AM Response to Original message |
3. If the White House approved it, then they SIGNED off on it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wickerman
![]() |
Wed Oct-29-03 12:00 PM Response to Reply #3 |
26. Great Point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loudnclear
![]() |
Wed Oct-29-03 12:14 PM Response to Reply #3 |
28. Just think what the whore media would be saying if this were Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shockingelk
![]() |
Wed Oct-29-03 07:43 AM Response to Original message |
4. coincidence? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpaceCatMeetsMars
![]() |
Wed Oct-29-03 07:59 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. It even looks like the same typeface is used in both. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jokerman93
![]() |
Wed Oct-29-03 01:02 PM Response to Reply #7 |
31. The stars and stripes banner graphic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alphafemale
![]() |
Wed Oct-29-03 09:58 AM Response to Reply #4 |
20. Yeah. Those came from the same print order I'd say n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder
![]() |
Wed Oct-29-03 07:47 AM Response to Original message |
5. That's not what they told the WP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights
![]() |
Wed Oct-29-03 07:54 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. That's not what they told the NYTimes either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet
![]() |
Wed Oct-29-03 08:06 AM Response to Reply #5 |
10. Ahhh - how nice to reminisce |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kskiska
![]() |
Wed Oct-29-03 10:31 AM Response to Reply #5 |
21. The WaPo article admits the W.H. chose the slogan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie
![]() |
Wed Oct-29-03 09:32 PM Response to Reply #5 |
35. Excerpt from above |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClintonTyree
![]() |
Wed Oct-29-03 08:00 AM Response to Original message |
9. They've been caught lying again......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bleedingheart
![]() |
Wed Oct-29-03 08:09 AM Response to Original message |
11. "The buck stops here" isn't a phrase GOPers understand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robb
![]() |
Wed Oct-29-03 08:14 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. They ran with it at Faux News last night... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bleedingheart
![]() |
Wed Oct-29-03 08:36 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. I didn't hear about "prance" comment...hahahaha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VolcanoJen
![]() |
Thu Oct-30-03 04:39 AM Response to Reply #12 |
44. The "prance" comment is priceless!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Thu Oct-30-03 04:33 AM Response to Reply #11 |
43. There is no buck |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0rganism
![]() |
Thu Oct-30-03 05:02 AM Response to Reply #43 |
45. By the time the buck stops with bush, it's not worth a nickel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jokerman93
![]() |
Thu Oct-30-03 05:02 PM Response to Reply #43 |
50. How can the buck stop at Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HPLeft
![]() |
Wed Oct-29-03 08:29 AM Response to Original message |
13. They really do think... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bif
![]() |
Wed Oct-29-03 09:31 AM Response to Original message |
15. More twists than Chubby Checkers! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
number six
![]() |
Wed Oct-29-03 09:33 AM Response to Original message |
16. You can't just go around sticking signs behind Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck
![]() |
Wed Oct-29-03 09:36 AM Response to Original message |
17. Didn't you notice the little 'Made in China" sign covered in the corner? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nostamj
![]() |
Wed Oct-29-03 09:50 AM Response to Original message |
18. GRAPHIC proof |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bushisanidiot
![]() |
Wed Oct-29-03 09:55 AM Response to Original message |
19. Funny How This Is Only Coming Out Now, AFTER AWOL Slipped |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wickerman
![]() |
Wed Oct-29-03 12:03 PM Response to Reply #19 |
27. yep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truthisfreedom
![]() |
Wed Oct-29-03 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
22. let it be. everyone that matters can see the truth of it...same font, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demgrrrll
![]() |
Wed Oct-29-03 11:04 AM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Someone upthread made the point that nothing would have been done |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demgrrrll
![]() |
Wed Oct-29-03 11:35 AM Response to Reply #23 |
24. O.K. I was able to find out that they have stated that they are working |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
neuvocat
![]() |
Wed Oct-29-03 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
25. What next? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine
![]() |
Thu Oct-30-03 12:14 AM Response to Reply #25 |
39. and the bulge in the crotch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0rganism
![]() |
Thu Oct-30-03 05:14 AM Response to Reply #39 |
46. Do you suppose the potato asked to be there? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MUAD_DIB
![]() |
Wed Oct-29-03 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
29. What utter and unbelievable BS! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT
![]() |
Wed Oct-29-03 05:11 PM Response to Reply #29 |
33. Didn't They Have To Turn The Ship So You Couldn't See... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie
![]() |
Wed Oct-29-03 10:11 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. Yes, they finally admitted that the ship was so close to San Diego |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwoody
![]() |
Wed Oct-29-03 12:47 PM Response to Original message |
30. What if the banner had said "Chimps Rule"? Would they have left it up? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
julka
![]() |
Wed Oct-29-03 10:40 PM Response to Reply #30 |
38. the swabs actually had one up, but Sforza made them take it down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lisa
![]() |
Wed Oct-29-03 02:24 PM Response to Original message |
32. oh, so now he's blaming the sailors ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT
![]() |
Wed Oct-29-03 08:59 PM Response to Original message |
34. Last Self-Bumpage !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinkpops
![]() |
Wed Oct-29-03 09:46 PM Response to Original message |
36. The irony is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate
![]() |
Thu Oct-30-03 12:37 AM Response to Original message |
40. Why does the US NAVY need the White house to make banners??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truthisfreedom
![]() |
Thu Oct-30-03 12:47 AM Response to Reply #40 |
41. because otherwise how would the font and color match all of the other |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evanstondem
![]() |
Thu Oct-30-03 12:50 AM Response to Reply #41 |
42. Plus it had to be just the right size for the TV cameras |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lisa
![]() |
Thu Oct-30-03 04:15 PM Response to Reply #40 |
48. It would have looked much better if the sailors had painted it ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dusty64
![]() |
Thu Oct-30-03 08:41 AM Response to Original message |
47. And another repig lie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 01:33 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC