|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
kskiska
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 04:35 PM Original message |
Obama certificate lawsuit dismissed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaliforniaPeggy
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 04:36 PM Response to Original message |
1. Good news! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trueblue2007
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 04:41 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Yehaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lasher
![]() |
Sat Nov-22-08 08:24 AM Response to Reply #1 |
34. It hasn't been on account of a lack of evidence. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EmperorHasNoClothes
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 04:38 PM Response to Original message |
2. Proof that the birth certificate doesn't exist! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
3. I'm pissed that they even had to verify that it was valid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sirveri
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 04:52 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. It's a legal requirement for the highest office in the nation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hekate
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 06:41 PM Response to Reply #7 |
14. I'd never in my life heard of such a thing before Obama ran for president. Humbug. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Land Shark
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 10:05 PM Response to Reply #14 |
24. The issue is not "citizenship" it is NATURAL BORN -- a huge technicality |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lolly
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 11:22 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. Not exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Sun Nov-23-08 11:13 AM Response to Reply #28 |
36. Don't confuse laws made by Congress with the clause in the Constitution that requires |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 07:28 PM Response to Reply #7 |
17. Please list all of the previous occasions when |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sirveri
![]() |
Sat Nov-22-08 01:38 AM Response to Reply #17 |
30. My guess is that it's part of the vetting process. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity
![]() |
Sat Nov-22-08 08:13 AM Response to Reply #30 |
33. There is no official vetting process |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Land Shark
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 09:52 PM Response to Reply #7 |
20. That's an insult to the American people (the ones who replaced King George in 1776) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sirveri
![]() |
Sat Nov-22-08 01:46 AM Response to Reply #20 |
31. I agree that it's stupid. But it's also the rules, you can't blame others |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Sun Nov-23-08 11:23 AM Response to Reply #31 |
38. Actually, this case says that the plaintiff lacked standing, which means |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sirveri
![]() |
Sun Nov-23-08 04:51 PM Response to Reply #38 |
44. Right, because the issue had already been settled by CREDIBLE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Sun Nov-23-08 11:20 AM Response to Reply #20 |
37. The people ratified the Constitution. There is a process for amending the Contstitution, which |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Sun Nov-23-08 11:09 AM Response to Reply #7 |
35. Yes, but there is no doubt at all the McCain was NOT born in the U.S. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 04:59 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. Actually, they did. I remember his having to produce it and have it verified because he was born on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 06:46 PM Response to Reply #3 |
15. They couldn't. The stone tablet was too heavy to lift. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Sun Nov-23-08 11:25 AM Response to Reply #15 |
39. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ms. Toad
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 09:23 PM Response to Reply #3 |
18. Well...now that you mention it, yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
4. These people just keep on suing and suing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eleny
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 04:41 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Well, one of these guys is going before the SCOTUS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scytherius
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 05:23 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. It's actually before Thomas now who has it set for hearing on whether |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PatGund
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 06:07 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Both of you are right... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eleny
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 07:10 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. I forgot about it going to Thomas - thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Land Shark
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 09:55 PM Response to Reply #16 |
21. Berg's case dismissed by Souter on 11/3 per supremecourtus.gov |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 04:52 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. They sue while complaining about frivolous lawsuits no less. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 10:46 PM Response to Reply #8 |
27. Don't you know, lawsuits are only frivolous if injured plaintiffs are trying to recover |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 05:07 PM Response to Original message |
10. Alan Keyes brought a lawsuit in California. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Land Shark
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 09:59 PM Response to Reply #10 |
23. The facts around this don't matter, the sovereign We the People ratified/assumed the risk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PatGund
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 06:06 PM Response to Original message |
12. And he STILL hasn't mentioned it on his blog..... :-) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Number23
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 09:31 PM Response to Original message |
19. Anyone who thinks that this will stop the Freepers and the fools who support them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
agent007
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 09:59 PM Response to Original message |
22. The loony had it coming |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lars39
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 10:08 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. Welcome to DU,agent007 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Land Shark
![]() |
Fri Nov-21-08 10:12 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. Agent 007 welcome to DU post #1 -- but it doesn't matter what gets "proved" here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Sun Nov-23-08 11:32 AM Response to Reply #26 |
40. Which people served in the House and Senate who were unqualified? No one challenged? Not even |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316
![]() |
Sun Nov-23-08 01:00 PM Response to Reply #26 |
41. Time for you to start naming names of anyone who served in Congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
47of74
![]() |
Sat Nov-22-08 12:31 AM Response to Original message |
29. Ha ha right wingers...now go crawl back in your holes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
silverojo
![]() |
Sat Nov-22-08 01:55 AM Response to Original message |
32. The Freeptards are, no doubt, shitting themselves |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NutmegYankee
![]() |
Sun Nov-23-08 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
42. This will never go away - Never stop |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Sun Nov-23-08 02:49 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. It's a cottage industry, just like the Arkansas Project was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun 15th 2024, 11:57 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC