|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Newsjock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 07:15 AM Original message |
(California) Marijuana legalization measure gets big lift |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pokercat999 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 07:45 AM Response to Original message |
1. THIS IS REALLY, REALLY BAD! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scuba (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 07:58 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Can I just get some and go home? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pattmarty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 08:55 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. That will just be ONE of many things to work out. Everybody and......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robdogbucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 01:40 PM Response to Reply #6 |
25. I would consider Portugal though n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 06:09 PM Response to Reply #6 |
53. We have a drug team here that's probably salivating at the prospect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pattmarty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-10 09:43 AM Response to Reply #53 |
84. We could start by legalizing Marijuana and putting a lot of these............. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Le Taz Hot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-28-10 06:05 AM Response to Reply #53 |
102. Yeah, our local Sherrif |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trajan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-09-10 10:48 AM Response to Reply #6 |
114. Let's not overstate this presumed mass migration for pot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-10 08:51 PM Response to Reply #2 |
97. Just don't try to go home |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zephie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 07:59 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. I know I would move... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 02:20 PM Response to Reply #3 |
30. Who's gonna know about your parrot? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zephie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 04:59 PM Response to Reply #30 |
44. I actually considered it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kurtzapril4 (354 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 05:25 PM Response to Reply #44 |
47. Quaker parakeets are not good for the environment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
movonne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 05:22 PM Response to Reply #3 |
46. I'm not so sure about the red states...the preacher will be out in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quakerboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-28-10 12:19 AM Response to Reply #3 |
99. Ferrets as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidhilton (426 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 08:37 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Yeah! I read that on the inner-tubes somewhere. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earcandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 10:27 AM Response to Reply #1 |
9. Oh please... Just leave if you have those fears! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Merlot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 06:23 PM Response to Reply #9 |
56. You forgot tourism. That will be a BIG boost to the economy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 07:41 PM Response to Reply #56 |
71. + 1. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhiteTara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 10:39 AM Response to Reply #1 |
11. you may be right...although |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Betsy Ross (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 11:21 AM Response to Reply #1 |
15. I want what you're smoking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 12:20 PM Response to Reply #1 |
17. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 12:57 PM Response to Reply #1 |
21. Naw, South Carolina sucks so much it will balance things out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalLovinLug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 03:42 PM Response to Reply #1 |
36. Slow and easy now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 05:29 PM Response to Reply #1 |
51. please please every pothead move. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MindPilot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 07:03 PM Response to Reply #51 |
65. We will gladly take your potheads....if |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Le Taz Hot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-28-10 06:10 AM Response to Reply #65 |
103. High five! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 11:36 PM Response to Reply #51 |
80. if we can quarantine all the fundamentalist idiots in Texas and put barbed wire around the state |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-09-10 12:48 PM Response to Reply #80 |
115. Unfortunately, it's not just TX |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-10-10 09:27 AM Response to Reply #51 |
121. 'potheads'. San Antonio would lose lots of peeps. Is that what you're hoping? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-10-10 07:57 PM Response to Reply #51 |
126. Just for the slur of "pothead", |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-11-10 04:11 PM Response to Reply #51 |
132. Yeah, all those losers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bigmack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 06:36 PM Response to Reply #1 |
60. OMG! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 07:40 PM Response to Reply #1 |
70. So I guess I better start buying a Big Big Boat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SugarShack (979 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 09:13 PM Response to Reply #1 |
77. I vote this the funniest post on DU!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donheld (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 09:42 PM Response to Reply #1 |
79. That will NOT happen, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Daphne08 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-10 05:59 AM Response to Reply #1 |
82. Now that's funny. Thanks for my first laugh of the day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Winterblues (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-10 10:18 AM Response to Reply #1 |
85. Dirty hippies need a bath anyway |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-08-10 12:52 PM Response to Reply #1 |
110. This is GOOD!!! REALLY, REALLY GOOD!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-08-10 05:54 PM Response to Reply #1 |
111. we could become the Amersterdam of America and get out of the recession with THC tourism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-10-10 03:21 AM Response to Reply #1 |
118. K&R! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-10-10 09:54 AM Response to Reply #1 |
122. It will be like Okies coming here during the Dust Bowl days looking for the land of milk and honey |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_in_LA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-10-10 08:32 PM Response to Reply #1 |
127. lol n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-11-10 03:51 PM Response to Reply #1 |
131. We'll have to organize an emergency pro legalization vote in New York! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Devil_Fish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-11-10 10:18 PM Response to Reply #1 |
134. That's fine with me, I live on a Boat in the Pacific Ocean. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pattmarty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 08:49 AM Response to Original message |
5. This is what I will be watching for on Nov 2. We know already that........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jerseyjack (369 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 10:00 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Reaction of the Feds if 19 passes - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
drmeow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 02:18 PM Response to Reply #7 |
29. I've always wanted to be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 06:16 PM Response to Reply #29 |
54. Which is why, unless you are a very good actor, that you never will be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MindPilot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 06:58 PM Response to Reply #54 |
64. I once watched most of a jury panel dismissed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
movonne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 05:26 PM Response to Reply #5 |
48. and those repugs that take over will do everthing in their power |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JNelson6563 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 05:46 PM Response to Reply #48 |
52. A referendum is much harder to undo than legislation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Merlot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 06:25 PM Response to Reply #52 |
58. What about prop 8? Looks like the judiciary is overturning that one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JNelson6563 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 07:26 PM Response to Reply #58 |
68. Well, that's unconstitutional. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Le Taz Hot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-28-10 06:16 AM Response to Reply #48 |
104. Obama has already said he will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hollowdweller (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-10-10 11:57 AM Response to Reply #5 |
125. If dems would lose both houses the GOP might pass a resolution for the feds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iamthebandfanman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 10:22 AM Response to Original message |
8. so cant wait for this to happen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lunatica (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 10:36 AM Response to Original message |
10. I've been one of those talking to everyone but I concentrate on the uses of hemp |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shanti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 02:09 PM Response to Reply #10 |
27. i'm with ya there! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lance_Boyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-10 10:35 AM Response to Reply #27 |
86. Hemp is cannabis ruderalis. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shanti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-10 01:11 PM Response to Reply #86 |
94. didn't answer my question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lance_Boyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-10 01:24 PM Response to Reply #94 |
95. your question asked "just cannabis" and I clarified that hemp *is* cannabis. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mike Marble (91 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-08-10 12:38 PM Response to Reply #27 |
107. Prop 19 would legalize the production of industrial hemp. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bitchkitty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 10:39 AM Response to Original message |
12. Good for them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MindPilot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 10:51 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. "Allows persons 21 years old to posses, cultivate & transport marijuana for personal use." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bitchkitty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-10 03:57 AM Response to Reply #14 |
81. Cool! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buns_of_Fire (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-11-10 03:31 PM Response to Reply #12 |
130. No free cannabis handed out at the California Welcome Centers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MindPilot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
13. DIFI wrote the "against" article in the voter's guide. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 12:26 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. MADD are a bunch of dumbass prohibitionists. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kievan Rus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 04:37 PM Response to Reply #18 |
43. Agreed. I loathe MADD and all like-minded nanny staters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scuba (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 12:48 PM Response to Reply #13 |
20. If MADD is against legalization, they're mad.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pscot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 07:52 PM Response to Reply #20 |
73. There would still be accidents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shanti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 02:11 PM Response to Reply #13 |
28. well fwiw |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MindPilot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 03:19 PM Response to Reply #28 |
34. It's supported by 49% of the voters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shanti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 05:26 PM Response to Reply #34 |
49. would you rather have carly fiorina? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MindPilot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 07:18 PM Response to Reply #49 |
67. I hate having to make those kinds of choices. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pattmarty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-10 09:36 AM Response to Reply #67 |
83. In this case it's not too much of a choice. If it was Feinstein/Fiorina............ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Merlot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 06:30 PM Response to Reply #34 |
59. It's political suicide to go against big industry: liquor, beer, pharmaceuticals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmowreader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 07:47 PM Response to Reply #28 |
72. They KNOW it's political suicide to come out in favor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mike Marble (91 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-09-10 02:15 PM Response to Reply #72 |
116. California elected officials who endorse P19/are not chicken shits: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krabigirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-10 12:07 PM Response to Reply #28 |
92. Well, she didn't write the "against" opinion in the election guide. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 06:16 PM Response to Reply #13 |
55. Isn't MADD the discredited organization whose head or founder or some such got a DUI? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bennyboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 08:23 PM Response to Reply #13 |
75. Di FI is an IDIOT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krabigirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-10 12:06 PM Response to Reply #13 |
91. Cannot wait until 2012 to hopefully vote DiFi out for good. She needs a strong primary challenger. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Le Taz Hot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-28-10 06:20 AM Response to Reply #91 |
105. She'll be 79 in 2012 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sofa king (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 11:23 AM Response to Original message |
16. Can we thank the Tea Baggers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
-..__... (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 12:45 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. Are the Tea Baggers against legalization of pot? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sofa king (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 01:29 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. They're not coherent enough to be libertarians. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krabigirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-10 12:09 PM Response to Reply #19 |
93. no, not the current batch of theocrats. they love big govt. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robdogbucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 01:35 PM Response to Original message |
23. "despite a total absence of paid advertising for either side..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 06:23 PM Response to Reply #23 |
57. DARE was shown to actually INCREASE drug use in communities that used it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bennyboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 01:38 PM Response to Original message |
24. STONERS AGAINST Prop 19. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robdogbucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 01:55 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Bennyboy you sound like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 02:42 PM Response to Reply #26 |
31. If pot is a gateway drug, then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 03:02 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. Then alcohol is also a gateway drug ....!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 03:24 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. I defy you to show me one hard drug user who didn't start |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 04:04 PM Response to Reply #35 |
38. You're sure it's not drunken sperm ....??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalLovinLug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 03:52 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. and so is Coffee! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 06:45 PM Response to Reply #24 |
62. micro breweries and budweiser co-exist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bennyboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 08:19 PM Response to Reply #62 |
74. As a brewer.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 09:19 PM Response to Reply #74 |
78. so that justifies keeping cannabis/hemp illegal? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mike Marble (91 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-08-10 12:42 PM Response to Reply #24 |
108. Stoners Against Prop 19 are the pot movement's Tea Partiers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 02:49 PM Response to Original message |
32. Imagine the numbers are higher and have always been higher .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duer 157099 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 04:14 PM Response to Original message |
39. This prop makes things worse for medical cannabis patients |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MindPilot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 04:29 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. The acutal wording, I think, is "with minors present." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duer 157099 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 04:34 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. I wonder why there isn't a law about taking Ambian "with minors present"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shanti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 05:28 PM Response to Reply #41 |
50. feinstein |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MindPilot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 06:52 PM Response to Reply #50 |
63. Oh, yeah. IIRC, that was about candy-flavored meth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 06:37 PM Response to Reply #39 |
61. this is not true. one of THE top marijuana attorneys addressed this issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duer 157099 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 07:08 PM Response to Reply #61 |
66. Thanks, I will read that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mike Marble (91 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-08-10 12:45 PM Response to Reply #39 |
109. Not true. Read what Americans for Safe Access has to say. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mike Marble (91 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-09-10 02:19 PM Response to Reply #39 |
117. Please stop spreading that Stoners Against Prop 19 bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 04:25 PM Response to Original message |
40. Kiicked and recommended. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xxqqqzme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 04:59 PM Response to Original message |
45. I'm going to vote for it but I do wish |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
budkin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 07:37 PM Response to Original message |
69. Smoking drugs is illegal!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shanti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 08:36 PM Response to Reply #69 |
76. tell that to the tobacco industry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-10 10:52 AM Response to Original message |
87. The big question is, what happens if this passes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-10 11:02 AM Response to Reply #87 |
88. well, first thing is that I light a big fat spliff sitting on my FRONT doorstep... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
musiclawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-10 12:00 PM Response to Reply #87 |
89. Nothing in terms of the feds. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
musiclawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-10 12:00 PM Response to Reply #87 |
90. Nothing in terms of the feds. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
divineorder (513 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-09-10 10:43 AM Response to Reply #90 |
113. I think the feds will draw back a bit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoeyTrib (215 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-10 08:19 PM Response to Reply #87 |
96. You know there's like a ton of weed stores in CA, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-10-10 09:56 AM Response to Reply #87 |
123. Yes, and the inevitable legal train wrecks will provide endless entertainment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Socal31 (707 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-10 11:53 PM Response to Original message |
98. Why did my supposedly (D) senator write the "against" argument... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-28-10 01:55 AM Response to Reply #98 |
100. because few politicians are going to support sane drug laws |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shanti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-10-10 11:22 AM Response to Reply #98 |
124. don't worry about that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-28-10 06:05 AM Response to Original message |
101. If alcholics chose smoking weed instead of drinking more people would still be alive how many |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-08-10 06:01 PM Response to Reply #101 |
112. Nobody ever smoked a joint and then went up a tower with a rifle. Nobody. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-11-10 05:02 PM Response to Reply #112 |
133. Agreed, at least in my experience. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-08-10 02:40 AM Response to Original message |
106. Deleted message |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-10-10 03:25 AM Response to Original message |
119. And how many people end up dead yearly smoking cigarettes?!... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-10-10 07:19 AM Response to Original message |
120. .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sofa king (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-10-10 09:48 PM Response to Original message |
128. Someone help me corner the market on Sluggles in California! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-11-10 01:11 AM Response to Original message |
129. The Beginning of the end of the phony "war on drugs(tm)" (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
urotsukidoji (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-18-10 11:49 PM Response to Original message |
135. THE DEFINITIVE BOOK on this subject |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Jun 15th 2024, 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC