|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles |
![]() |
dolo amber
![]() |
Thu Feb-28-08 02:16 PM Original message |
McCain's birthplace in Panama Canal Zone raises eligibility questions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FogerRox
![]() |
Thu Feb-28-08 02:20 PM Response to Original message |
1. Sorry, old and weak. If Military families were told their kids cant be citizens |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau
![]() |
Thu Feb-28-08 05:52 PM Response to Reply #1 |
22. "citizens question is a given - but Constitution "native" is not - but it's w/o merit as his |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notadmblnd
![]() |
Thu Feb-28-08 02:30 PM Response to Original message |
2. his parents were rich Americans, that makes him an American citizen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ben_meyers
![]() |
Thu Feb-28-08 02:53 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. His father was in the military, stationed in Panama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Croquist
![]() |
Thu Feb-28-08 03:33 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. That's just a rude statement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste
![]() |
Thu Feb-28-08 04:16 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. Only to the point in which he earns our disrespect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
galileo3000
![]() |
Thu Feb-28-08 04:27 PM Response to Reply #9 |
19. Thanks, you are right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Croquist
![]() |
Thu Feb-28-08 08:48 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IsItJustMe
![]() |
Thu Feb-28-08 10:37 PM Response to Reply #9 |
24. interesting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drifter
![]() |
Thu Feb-28-08 02:33 PM Response to Original message |
3. Does that mean ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DinahMoeHum
![]() |
Thu Feb-28-08 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
4. IMO, this is a dead issue. He was born to American citizens, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
atreides1
![]() |
Thu Feb-28-08 03:28 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Not that simple |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MindPilot
![]() |
Thu Feb-28-08 03:58 PM Response to Reply #6 |
13. I was born on a US military installation in the UK. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scisyhp1
![]() |
Thu Feb-28-08 04:16 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. Nobody questions McCain's citizenship. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JPZenger
![]() |
Fri Feb-29-08 08:51 AM Response to Reply #4 |
26. Natural born vs. naturalized |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
montanto
![]() |
Thu Feb-28-08 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
7. WTF? exploded long ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LTR
![]() |
Thu Feb-28-08 03:31 PM Response to Original message |
8. If a person is born to American citizens in a U.S. territory... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WTyler
![]() |
Thu Feb-28-08 03:38 PM Response to Original message |
10. Meh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MindPilot
![]() |
Thu Feb-28-08 03:52 PM Response to Original message |
11. Then how is * president? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2Design
![]() |
Thu Feb-28-08 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
12. ridiculous n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
monmouth
![]() |
Thu Feb-28-08 04:06 PM Response to Original message |
14. I just read on either C&L or HuffPo that Bush will grant an "amnesty" for him...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crabby Appleton
![]() |
Thu Feb-28-08 04:13 PM Response to Original message |
15. TITLE 8 > CHAPTER 12 > SUBCHAPTER III > Part I > § 1401 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crabby Appleton
![]() |
Thu Feb-28-08 04:15 PM Response to Original message |
16. and TITLE 8 > CHAPTER 12 > SUBCHAPTER III > Part I > § 1403 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scisyhp1
![]() |
Thu Feb-28-08 04:41 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. That law has no bearing on McCain's status as "natural born citizen" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ngant17
![]() |
Thu Feb-28-08 05:38 PM Response to Original message |
21. Well, maybe it's time for liberals to adopt "strict constructionism" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DRoseDARs
![]() |
Fri Feb-29-08 01:15 AM Response to Original message |
25. Crosslink with the GD thread on exact same issue, exact same NYT article earlier this evening. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mon Jun 17th 2024, 02:43 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC