Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The $16 Muffin That Wasn’t - NYT

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Bill USA Donating Member (628 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-11 03:40 PM
Original message
The $16 Muffin That Wasn’t - NYT
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/29/us/politics/report-of-justice-depts-16-muffin-greatly-exaggerated.html


WASHINGTON — The office of the Justice Department inspector general on Friday retracted its much publicized claim that the agency had spent $16 per breakfast muffin at a conference. And it expressed regret for the “significant negative publicity” for the department and for the hotel that hosted the meeting that resulted from the erroneous finding in a report last month.

The supposed “$16 muffins,” at a conference for immigration lawyers in August 2009, had been a highlight of the report, which blasted the Justice Department for “extravagant and potentially wasteful” spending on food at conferences at the end of the Bush administration and early in President Obama’s term.

~~
~~

But the department and the hotel, the Capital Hilton, said the cost of the breakfast had included not only muffins but also fruit, coffee, juice, taxes and a gratuity for the servers. It was also part of a package with the hotel that included “free” use of a ballroom and a dozen meeting rooms during the five-day conference.

In a new introduction to a revised report issued on Friday, the Office of the Inspector General said it had reviewed additional paperwork and now agreed that its conclusions “were incorrect and that the Department did not pay $16 per muffin.”


Refresh | +10 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Owlet Donating Member (765 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-11 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Pretty sloppy work, General
Why don't you do the right thing and resign. You know: resign, quit, hand in your papers. Of course I realize it simply isn't done in DC. I mean, who'd run the gummint if every fuckup quit? (is this where I put the 'sarcasm' thingy?) What we need is an "I'm mad as hell and I'm not taking it anymore!" smiley. Maybe something like:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-11 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Typical to bundle the cost of the facility in with the food
Often makes it easier to get it thought the sign off cycle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Sep 24th 2025, 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC