Divine Discontent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-10-12 12:45 PM
Original message |
Robert F Kennedy Jr: Mitt Romney's Test of Moral Fiber |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-10-12 12:51 PM by Divine Discontent
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: Mitt Romney's Test of Moral Fiber snip of longer article
January 9, 2012 08:42:03 I was surprised when Mitt Romney's son, Matt, resuscitated the "birther" issue in New Hampshire on December 29. Speaking at a campaign event, the young Romney deflected a question about his father's refusal to release his income tax return by citing a proposal that President Barack Obama should first release his own birth certificate. Mr. Romney, who has since retracted his statement, apparently did not realize that, at White House urging, the state of Hawaii released the president's long form birth certificate on April 25, 2011. The White House deemed that action necessary to quiet a noisy debate that was distracting the country and damaging the national interest. The basis of the tempest was the Constitution's Article II Section 1, which seems to prohibit anyone except "naturalized American citizens" born in the USA from serving as president. A small group of conspiracy crackpots, theorizing that the president was lying about having been born in Hawaii, found a bullhorn for their quackery on Fox News and hate radio. Like milk on a hot stove, the bizarre obsession of a lunatic fringe suddenly grew to envelop even the rational remnants of the Republican Party, drowning sane discourse on vital issues of public import. It was apparent from the outset that the topic's steroidal appeal was its dog whistle usefulness in highlighting the "otherness" of America's first African American president; there was no appetite among these conservative cohorts for applying the Article II Section 1 prohibition against the GOP's 2008 candidate, John McCain, a white man born in Panama .
www.huffingtonpost.com/blackberry/p.html?id=1193612
|
No Elephants
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-11-12 07:36 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Not fer nuttin, but that article misquotes the Constitution. |
|
The Constitution does not require that the President be a "naturalized American citizen," which would be someone who became a citizen through naturalization.
(One definition of "naturalization" is "the process of assuming or being granted citizenship of a country, usually a country other than that of the person’s origin."
The Constitution requires the opposite.
Article II, Section I provides, in pertinent part:
"No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States."
FWIW:
While the SCCOTUS never made a direct holding on that language, there is dicta in a SCOTUS case to the effect that, when the Constitution was written, it was understood that someone born within a country was a "natural born citizen" of that country. The SCOTUS never said, even in dicta, that being born within a country was the ONLY way to be a "natural born citizen," though.
McCain was born to two American citizens. Nothing says he cannot be a "natural born citizen" of the United States, within the meaning of the above-quoted language of Article II.
And, even IF Obama had been born to an American mother in Kenya, nothing says he could not be "a natural born citizen" within the meaning of Article II.
This whole issue has been smoke and mirrors from Day One and Romney's son is disgusting to attempt to resurrect it.
All that said, what the hell does it have to do with Romney's refusal to release his income taxes?
We in Massachusetts know he has fudged his taxes in the past. Maybe that is what he is hiding, since everyone knows he's freaking rich.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Jul 24th 2025, 04:07 PM
Response to Original message |