|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
quinnox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-26-04 12:08 PM Original message |
Anyone else think N.Y. Times is elitist? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-26-04 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
1. Love the NYT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
el_gato (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-26-04 01:24 PM Response to Reply #1 |
12. uh Hello?! NYT was instrumental in spreading the Iraq war lies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Caution (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-26-04 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
2. I disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-26-04 12:15 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. I agree with Caution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skippysmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-26-04 12:13 PM Response to Original message |
3. I've noticed this in many mainstream publications |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-26-04 12:16 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Bear in mind the NY cost of living |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Classical_Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-26-04 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
6. Tom Friedman could ruin anyones day with that tone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cocoa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-26-04 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
7. the magazine seems elitist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-26-04 01:41 PM Response to Reply #7 |
21. The crossword puzzle, to paraphrase Bill Clinton, is often the only part |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
prodigal_green (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-26-04 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
8. In the words of Get Your War on (second strip) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sadiesworld (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-26-04 12:21 PM Response to Original message |
9. To an extent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Classical_Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-26-04 12:24 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. They are neoliberals or liberal cousins of the neocons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sadiesworld (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-26-04 01:29 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. Sad but true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snellius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-26-04 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
11. This sounds like the kind of argument that Bush makes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jacobin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-26-04 01:25 PM Response to Original message |
13. No. Its just a RW rag |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-26-04 01:27 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Funny, the right considers it left wing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sadiesworld (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-26-04 01:35 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. The right thinks that anything to the left of Fox is a socialist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-26-04 01:43 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. And the left thinks anything to the right of WSWS is fascist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sadiesworld (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-26-04 02:02 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Liberal on social issues. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-26-04 02:15 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. Again, it WOULD prove it for righties |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sadiesworld (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-26-04 02:31 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. Yes, I think we agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
el_gato (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-26-04 02:03 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Prove it muddle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jacobin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-26-04 01:38 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. Actually, if a paper ever prints anything that questions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-26-04 01:39 PM Response to Reply #13 |
20. And don't forget Saffire. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theboss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-26-04 01:31 PM Response to Original message |
16. I like it because it is elitist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-26-04 01:38 PM Response to Original message |
18. The Sunday Style section is a shameless ode to desire and celebration of.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theboss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-26-04 02:33 PM Response to Reply #18 |
29. Out of curiosity . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-26-04 02:58 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Because, when I read the article, the question that I had in my mind... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maggrwaggr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-26-04 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
25. well, it's written for people who can actually read ..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
artistforpeace (29 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-26-04 02:24 PM Response to Original message |
27. Elitists new word for intellect? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stopbush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-26-04 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
30. Elitist? No. Clueless? Yep. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Logansquare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-26-04 05:38 PM Response to Original message |
32. Well, if you mean "caters to rich people," yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Sep 25th 2024, 07:55 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC