Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does DU really support the troops?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 09:32 AM
Original message
Does DU really support the troops?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hee, Seito.
Well, I have one of those yellow ribbons on my car. Isn't that enough? /sarcasm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. Hey crispini
As long as you keep driving that sticker to all those town hall, city counsel and LWV meetings, I would say that is certainly enough. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. Almost 500 posts in that thread which called for "DU Vets" ...
DU IS "the troops!" :hi:

Recommended, thank yOU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Thanks mzmolly
This thread really puts things in perspective.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. Indeed it does!
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UrbScotty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. Support the troops! BRING THEM HOME! (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
75. I say..
Protect The Troops! Give them armour and don't cut their benefits!

The bush fascists have put them in harm's way and are killing them off..any idiot can see that..but not worshippers at the alter of
monkey shit!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. I will never understand how the right
has framed itself as the party that supports the troops. So many Americans mindlessness accept what they are told.

What the left is for:
Bringing the troops home safe
Taking care of them upon their return
Allowing them to receive their full disability and retirement at the same time

The good news is that many Americans are getting hit personally, or they know someone that has been affected deeply by this war. That tends to snap them out of their hypnotic trance.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #7
22. I encountered such a person at Costco right before the election
Edited on Sun Feb-27-05 10:16 AM by CrispyQGirl
She was parked across from me. I saw she had one of those yellow ribbon magnets on her SUV. After loading her haul into her truck, she had the gall to approach me & call me out on my anti-boosh bumper stickers on the very day I was loading up my truck with supplies to send to my friend, a nurse, who is stationed in Iraq.

As I loaded socks, tooth brushes, anti-itch cream, baby wipes, etc into the back of my truck she told me that she was a patriotic American & she didn't appreciate the message my stickers were sending to the troops & that I should be ashamed!

I told her where the supplies were going & who they were for. Then I asked her what she was doing to support the troops & then said, "Oh I see. You have a silly little magnet on the back of your car. That's very helpful to the troops." She at least had the good grace to turn bright red before she turned & walked away. I called out to her, "Hey! You should reevaluate your definition of patriotism." I watched as she backed out & roared off, but she made damned sure she didn't look my way.

What I've found interesting, is since boosh 'won' I've seen more & more vehicles with multiple ribbon stickers. Always the yellow one, and a variety of red, white & blue ones, but NEVER the one that says "Bring the troops home."

How they don't see their own hypocrisy simply amazes me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #22
117. I don't support the war...
Edited on Mon Feb-28-05 03:02 PM by TheGoldenRule
But Yes, I support the troops-by bringing them home!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
6. Let me ask the other question.
Do the Freepers, who sit in their exuburban mini mansions, driving SUV's, praise killing Aye-Rabs, and praying for Jeebus to bless our retarded sociopathic band of simians in DC support the troops?

I mean they all have the stickers on their Ford Exhibitionists, but what does that mean? Only that they support the war, which is decidedly not supporting the troops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. They do not stop to think
They have been told that if you wave the flag and tell the world that you support the troops, that is enough. They do not realize that it is our sacred duty, as Americans, to ensure that our soldiers are never misused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #14
39. Thank you for that response.
like a hammer to the nail, that drives it home.

I knew a German born woman whose husband had been a soldier under
the Nazis. He died in Russia, a place he did not want to be
fighting in a war he really did not want to fight, but he came
from a military family, and followed his family calling.

Like many of our troops regarding **, he didn't have a lot of respect, according to her, for the party/state and its war of ideology. He went to Russia thinking it a fool's errand.

She wound up marrying an American GI, and moving back to the states with him. But she still had a picture of her first husband, who did not look like a monster, just a kid, all proud in his uniform.

I met her in a production of 'Cabaret' back in 73. Her guilt
and sorrow hung around her like a dark cloud. I would spare our boys and girls Hildegard D's black lung of the soul. I hope hers cleared up before she died, but generally it is incurable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #14
53. "our sacred duty"...beautifully stated, Seito!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
8. I support war crimes, torture & genocide. As long as my gas is cheap.
Edited on Sun Feb-27-05 09:53 AM by BlueEyedSon
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catch22Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
9. seito, I am a former "troop"
When I ordered my blue bands, from www.thinkblue2008.com I made sure my donation went to "Adopt a Platoon" So, now if some fundie repuke gives me shit about my blue band (I'm in Oklahoma, it happens all the time) I just reply "The money for this band went to Adopt a Platoon, what have YOU done lately?"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Great idea
Thanks Catch22Dem for you CONTINUED service. :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. Awesome!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
56. Whoohoo...this be the band! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Exit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
12. Does it matter, when we the people have zero power to help them?
The majority of Americans, DU included, want our troops HOME. Are we listened to? No--because in a fascist government, the people have no voice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. We have more power than you think
The day we lose is the day we stop believing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Exit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #18
33. OK, I'm willing to keep believing...
...until the day Bush/WWIII cause my death!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #12
30. When "the majority of Americans" invest 1/2 the time and risk ...
... to life and limb that the average person in the military invests, then and only then can it be claimed "the people have no voice." If the people choose to whisper, they cannot then claim they have "no voice."

How many of the '59 million' have actually joined a protest march?
How many of the '59 million' have held a General Strike?

At the same time, many of the '59 million' seem all-too-willing to shift the additional burden onto the backs of military and ask them to refuse orders and to refuse deployment. I guess it's easy to ask others to mutiny when the risk of asking it is nil. It's even easier, I guess, to take the worst of reported behavior and paint all military personnel with a broad brush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Exit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #30
35. You won't find me disparaging the troops,
nor, for that matter, disparaging the top brass--b/c so many of even the top-level military have clearly stated that this war is a fraud. I agree with them.

Regarding your point that more people should be actively involved--point well taken.

I do speak my opinion, I try not to whisper it or be silent... it's just that it is very frustrating, when I (and the others speaking out) are NEVER listened to by this administration. We weren't even listened to when we voted! Instead, the election was stolen right out of our hands.

The real enemy is the adminstration--not the troops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
16. I don't support what they're doing; if that means I don't "support...
... the troops" then I don't support the troops.

I think many have been deceived, exploited, short-changed by the gov't.I sympathize with those in this category. Nonetheless, I do not support what the troops are doing in Iraq.

Shoot me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. There is a difference between supporting the soldier
and supporting their mission. The soldier is just a person. There are good and bad people in every organization. I use the term soldier to represent every service member, regardless of the branch of service.

The soldier joined the military to serve this nation. Many joined over 20 years ago, and have been called back. The soldier has no control over the mission. The choice is literally "go to war or go to jail"

It is our duty to fight for them. It is our duty to make sure that the world knows how this administration is exploiting them, holding them for longer and longer deployments, and not providing adequate care upon their return.

Can you support the soldier and oppose the war? In my opinion,that is the only way to support them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #21
42. You are making a blanket statement about all soldiers joining
to serve our country, and I disagree. Like Jessica Lynch, many young people join in order to obtain money for a college education. Other young immature kids lured by a promise of a life that was like being a character of a video game. Some because they are just that poor, and have no other place to go.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #42
54. You are right
Of course there are many reasons why people choose to enter military service. I teach at risk 16-18 year old kids. Many of them are contemplating joining the military as a "way out". They do NOT understand what they are getting themselves into. I try to enlighten them on what they are getting themselves into, and hope that they take it to heart.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #54
71. That is a shame. My father joined in 1947, to create a better life
for his family. And he did.

I am proud of my military heritage, but not of the those that use the military to promote their corrupt schemes for money and power.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
driver8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #71
106. My father also joined for a better life...
He grew up in Texas and knew that if he stayed, he would end up stuck in a small town with a shitty job and no way out. He told me that he could not wait to get out of his hometown.

My dad joined the Navy in 1955 and made a career out of it...doing a job that he loved. I am proud of my military heritage, also. (I am a 6 year Navy vet).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapphire Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #42
77. So true
The 'perks' in the military recruitment promo ads are the reason so many young people took the risk of enlisting. I doubt that they expected to be shipped off to fight a war based on lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #21
49. I don't agree with that statement....
Edited on Sun Feb-27-05 12:00 PM by mike_c
Substitute "armed robber" or "serial killer" for "soldier" to see how flawed that logic is. Or even "litterer." There is no crime without criminals, and we punish the criminals, not their "mission." If the invasion and occupation of Iraq is a crime against humanity-- and I think it is-- then everyone involved in it is a war criminal by definition. And as for the choice between war or jail, remember that WE are the ones who drafted the Nuremberg protocols that place responsibility on all soldiers to refuse illegal orders. There is a bit of a catch-22 operating here in that the national principles those men and women signed up to serve include the responsibility to refuse service in illegal actions. Would you ask a soldier to risk death for a corrupt and illegal foreign policy, but not ask them to risk jail in defense of our nation's principles?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #49
52. If I get the call
I will have a real choice. Go to war or go to jail. I am in the medical field, a non-combatant. I may have to REALLY make that decision. Are you willing to engage in civil disobedience along with the other 59 million Americans that oppose this war and go to jail along with me?

Just wondering...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #52
57. yes....
And I live and work in a community that is actively debating whether to provide refuge for refusniks and deserters. We have a draft resolution before the city council that calls on us to do just that.

If you get the call, and need refuge, PM me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #57
59. Will do n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ikojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #21
68. To paraphrase.....
There's a difference between supporting the SS and supporting their mission. The SS is just a regular person. There are good and bad members of the SS.

The individual joined the SS to serve the fatherland. Many joined during the first great war. The SS has no control over the mission. The choice is go to war or to Auschwitz.

So what if they kill a few Jews or other so called undesireables, they have no control over what Himmler or Hitler orders them to do. They are only following orders as all good SS men do.



I say we all have moral choices and those who chose to torture do NOT deserve my pity nor my support.

I support those troops who choose not to serve in this war and who choose to defy orders to torture another human being.

THOSE troops are worth supporting and they are growing in numbers. Read the cover story in the March Harpers about troops going AWOL and the increase in their numbers since 2001.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #68
73. So let me make sure that I understand
I say we all have moral choices and those who chose to torture do NOT deserve my pity nor my support.

I support those troops who choose not to serve in this war and who choose to defy orders to torture another human being.


Are you saying that all soldiers that choose to go to Iraq, rather than go AWOL are choosing to engage in torture?

I oppose the war. I oppose ** and what THIS ADMINISTRATION is doing. I oppose the individuals that are committing war crimes. I support the activists that are doing everything they can to bring about an end to this illegal occupation.

The soldiers (all of them) deserve to be protected from this government. If we are not going to do it, then who will?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ikojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #73
87. No, I am not saying that. What I am saying is that those who join
now, knowing they stand a good chance of going to Iraq and killing others are not making a moral choice. They know what this president and his supporters in both parties stand for yet they choose to go. They willingly choose to go to war by enlisting.

I can understand, to some degree, that the National Guard people did not enlist expecting to be sent overseas, THEY are the ones who are really being screwed because they are not considered full time military and thus do not receive all of the "benefits" accorded full time military people.

There are many choosing not to go, as the enlistment numbers, inside and outside the military, show. Many branches of the military are not meeting their quotas of either keeping them in or recruiting new members.

I AM saying that those who engaged in torture or KNEW about the torture and said nothing are not deserving of our support. That I will stand by.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #16
58. Not Shoot you! Don't support either! and they volunteered. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #58
64. I do not understand
how anyone can brush aside what is happening to the troops with "they volunteered"

Soldiers are people too. Yes, they volunteered. I can not think of any free American adult that is more subject to abuse than a military person. I know of a soldier that was literally handcuffed and dragged onto the plane to go to Iraq.

The government has betrayed the trust of the military, just as it has betrayed our trust.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #64
65. I am not condoning the treatment of our troops by this administration
You must have misread. I am saying there should not be ANY volunteers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #65
67. Sorry if I mis-interpreted your statement
Many volunteered in a very different world. Today, they are no longer volunteers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #67
115. Itssso k..... Sometimes I don't even make sense to myself. LOL
I don't see as good as I used to, maybe I typoed or something and missed it. Sorrright Bobalouie!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
17. Support the troops after they come home as well, and don't
let them end up like so much used equipment that no longer has a use, nor importance. It's a blessing and a shame that organizations such as these exist.

http://www.nchv.org/index.cfm


Contact Us

333 ½ Pennsylvania Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20003-1148
E-mail: nchv@nchv.org


Thin Gray Line
Toll Free: 800.VET.HELP
Voice: 202.546.1969
Fax: 202.546.2063


http://www1.va.gov/homeless/


* aggressive outreach to those veterans living on streets and in shelters who otherwise would not seek assistance;
* clinical assessment and referral to needed medical treatment for physical and psychiatric disorders, including substance abuse;
* long-term sheltered transitional assistance, case management, and rehabilitation;
* employment assistance and linkage with available income supports; and
* supported permanent housing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #17
27. Thank you so much for your service n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
da_chimperor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
19. If by support you mean trying to keep them alive and whole . . .
Yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #19
26. That is EXACTLY what I mean
Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
20. Myself - only individuals
I've met too many people who couldn't wait to go over there and start killing brown people. I refuse to regurgitate the broad "SUPPORT THE TROOPS" buzzword crap, and I refuse to see or paint them all as angel-faced, blonde, blue-eyed heroes of the common man. They're human beings which means they're fully capable of being despicable, just like all of us.

I support individuals, not some iconic image of "TROOPS".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. The soldiers that I see are not eager at all to go to war
I served six years active duty, and I live in a military town. The father of one of my students leaves for Iraq on Tuesday. I can tell you that my experience is just the opposite.

The troops that are in Iraq are serving up to two-year deployments. They are being ABUSED by this administration. They do not look forward to going over there and killing anyone. They go over worried about when, (if) they will ever return.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. A quote from a "troop"
"Give me a gun, I'm ready. One of those ragheads comes up to me and says 'I'm innocent' and I'll go 'Bang! Now you're dead.'" This was said to my face, and I'm quoting as accurately as I can remember.

Yep, some are being abused. Then again, some are enjoying the hell out of getting to kill, rape, and torture people. That's why I refuse to turn the "troops" into some kind of iconic conglomerate Good-Guy entity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. There are good and bad everywhere
One of my best friends served in Desert Storm as an Army Medic. He suffers to this day with PTSD and Gulf War Syndrome. He is one of the most compassionate individuals I have ever known. He knows what it is like to treat a 4 year old that had her hand blown off because she tried to pick up a shiny bit of unexploded ordinance.

He has witnessed, in a very real and personal manner, the suffering that goes along with war. These veterans that have endured up to 2 years of war are going to be very different people when they return. For many of them, their lives will never be the same.

While I agree that there are some assholes out there, I disagree that they represent the majority. Just as there are some immature and thoughtless people here at DU, I believe that progressives, as a whole, are good hearted, compassionate and intelligent people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #31
34. Indeed
And I never once said I thought they were the majority. They MIGHT be, but I haven't met all of them yet.

See what you did, you made me do a disclaimer. :) I fucking hate those - they are so self defeating. It's like apologizing for having your opinion. Let us never speak of this again.

I realize mine is an unpopular opinion. We seem to desperately need our angelic Good Guys(tm) and our blood-drenched demonic Bad Guys(tm). I generally tend to see things in more shades of gray than that, however. As you said, there is good and bad everywhere - and for that exact reason, I don't angelicize. I especially don't angelicize something as vague as "troops".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #34
37. To never speaking of it again
:toast:

I respect your opinion, and your right to have it without apology. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. ::grins::
And I, in turn, will respect yours. Support away, my friend. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #25
61. If they have been in military for 4 years, they volunteered with the
Edited on Sun Feb-27-05 12:20 PM by lonestarnot
bushitler in power...Who in their right mind would join the military with this puke at the helm? I served in an air tactical control squadron U.S.A.F and recall seriously considering the ramifications of my enlistment before I signed. I remember considering then whether the then President of the United States would lie and send me to war for profit rather than purpose as grand as prior wars that had been fought, stood for, and I went with "No he won't" and signed. Yes, I'm a little paranoid, trying to think of all ramifications to all major decisions in life. People enlisting for this war now, and volunteering now. are just insane. The only way I would do it is if it were the only option given for escape of the death penalty and then I would think long and hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #61
69. Soldiers sign an eight-year commitment
Many that are still under obligation to serve joined under the Clinton administration. Some that are being recalled are retired and joined 20-30 years ago.

I agree that every person should seriously consider what they are getting into before enlisting. Unfortunately, many young kids do not.

I teach at risk 16-18 year old kids. They come from poor homes, and they have failed in school. Many of these kids have a 3rd grade reading level, and they believe EVERYTHING they are told.

They are so eager for anyone to take an interest in them. The recruiter comes along and offers them a way out of their present life. They sell them on the money for college, the job skill training etc. That is all it takes. These kids do not look beyond that.

The other day a kid asked me, "What branch of service should I join if I don't want to go to war?"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
23. You also might notice how few of us bother to weigh in ...
... on the jody-threads. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
24. Thanks - I missed the original thread-was in post-election withdrawal.
If I'd seen it I would have listed my two WW II uncle/vets - one piloted Flying Boxcars over the hump (Burma); and the other was skipper of a PT boat in the Pacific; and my daughter -1st Lt., Army; and three Army officer cousins (Vietnam, Iraq I and Iraq II)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #24
80. My thanks goes out to all of your family members that have served
Is your daughter still in the service?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
29. I do.
I think it's a more complex issue than "They knew what they were signing up for." I've knitted for the troops, and I've sent a care package to a unit registered through http://www.anysoldier.com (a sad, scary site, btw that lists everything they need) with my kids helping me.

I used to teach high school, and I know that there were a lot of kids pressured to go into the Army or whatever because they weren't ready for college or couldn't afford college with their grades and all (or they would never be able to go--our biggest recruiting area was special needs kids who were mainstreamed when I was in student teaching). I really don't think all those kids really knew what they were signing up for. War wasn't real to them, as they were too young to remember the Cold War or even the first Gulf War, and the closest they came to it were video games. Even the new recruits now are mostly trying to escape poverty and be able to work when they get out.

Those kids--and they are just kids, mostly--need to still feel connected with the people back home. They need socks, hats, skin lotion, and even scrubs and laundry soap. How can we not have compassion on them, kids caught up in a weird PNAC world?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #29
81. You do a great service
Thank you so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #81
86. I wish I could do more. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
32. DUers actually "do" something about it instead of putting a cammo
"support the troops" magnet on our car. Or handing out the unpatriotic labels to dems. For us, it's about protesting this farce, sending care packages to the troops, writing to our congresspeople, and...all the while, sobbing and hurting over every loss that isn't publicized quite so much anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
necso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
36. Well, it depends on what you mean
Edited on Sun Feb-27-05 11:05 AM by necso
by supporting the troops.

If you mean superficial lock-step patronizing* of the troops, consisting primarily of empty, pompous wheezings -- and little more than that (except when forced to do so by circumstances) -- or using their name (or that of flag, country, etc) to justify measures harmful both to individual members of military and to the American military as a whole (and to say nothing of the wider world of interests and issues), then no. That is what the RW does, not us.

If you mean wishing the best for individual members of the military, then, very largely, yes. And there are also members here who have taken concrete steps to do so by sending packages to the troops, buying phone cards for them, etc.

And if you mean supporting the troops by wishing to stop this counterproductive war and removing the troops from harm's way, then for many, yes. There are any number of people here struggling towards that end.

There are also any number of people here who support having a strong military that provides the best possible for its members (within affordable constraints) and veterans.

And there are members here who have considerable problems with the civilian casualties, the torture, etc involved in the war in Iraq. Many of these members, I think, have the good sense to realize that it is command that is ultimately responsible for these things. Still, some members probably see it otherwise. And these occurrences were (are) at best unfortunate, while some were (are) clearly illegal acts -- and it may reach further than that.

Myself, I know what war brings -- what war almost always brings. And I think of these things when contemplating the possibility of conflict. It was not that long ago, when a defended city fell, that it was expected that rape and murder, looting and vandalism by the victorious troops would occur (often widely and savagely). And although the "rules" of war no longer permit this, many bad things almost inevitably happen in war time (such as "collateral damage" -- particularly when fighting in populated areas). -- But the only way to completely avoid the unintended consequences of war is to avoid war itself.

And although avoiding war in general is not always possible, avoiding the war in Iraq most certainly was. Indeed, this war is a colossal misadventure fueled primarily by ignorance, delusion and hubris. -- How could it possibly be good for the military in the actual circumstances and practise?

...

patronizing: To treat in a condescending manner.

condescending: To descend to the level of one considered inferior; lower oneself.

One of the common methods of being patronizing is to pretend to treat someone with elaborate courtesy -- or as though he were a "superior" or a well-respected person, when he is really viewed (and treated) as an inferior, except in the most superficial ways. Done well, this can come across as actually being respectful and concerned -- as opposed to revealing the real (and total) hypocrisy of this pretense -- that is, as opposed to revealing the actual contempt and lack of concern, (as evidenced by the more meaningful acts) underlying this pretended, superficial and generally quite meaningless behavior.

...

And, of course, there are all those trolls who try to make us look bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #36
46. It was sort of a rhetorical question to highlight the attached thread
For me, supporting the troops, means:

Doing everything possible to ensure that they are never misused, or abused

Supporting the families, while the service members are deployed and providing adequate care when they return

Ensuring our government properly equips and trains them.

Fighting to bring them home as soon as possible

Ending the back-door draft and unreasonably long deployments

Honoring those that serve and have served honorably



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
necso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #46
60. And so I took it. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #46
113. This is a tough issue!
Consider the difference between the person who enlisted long before the invasion, and the one who enlisted long after it became clear that the war was fought on false premises. These two soldiers appear to me to be in two very different ethical places.

I might wish that all of our soldiers refused illegal orders to fight in the war, but I accept that this choice very difficult. I cannot however support in any way those who choose to volunteer now, knowing that their choice puts them into an ethically compromised position.

While in general I think our soldiers ought to be decently equipped, does my support extend to the latest in lethal anti-insurgency equipment? I hate to use numbers when making ethical decisions, but don't I have to consider the 100,000+ dead Iraqis when evaluating the merits of increasing the funding of our military budget for Iraq, knowing that extra spending will mean more dead Iraqis, that in some cases 'supporting the troops' means increasing the kill ratio?

Our opposition to the vietnam war has been used by the right, they continue to attempt to transform it into support for killing our troops. Jane Fonda should never have posed next to NV artillery. We played into their hands to a certain extent. We should be clear that for us 'support the troops' means 'bring them home now'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
40. Cheers, Seito! Thank you posting this separately!
In light of everything that was going on, I thought it would be a nice thing for everyone to see! :toast: You're on the 'greatest page' :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #40
41. Thanks Bluebear
:toast:

It was such a touching tribute, thanks for suggesting a separate post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Longgrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
43. I've seriously never seen any 'troop' bashing around here...
Lot's of anti-war talk, but never any bad-mouthing of our soldiers.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #43
63. What I've witnessed on DU is a frustration with events...
...and the actions of the US military in Iraq. It's hard to chirp "support our troops" when you see picture after picture after picture of the Iraqi victims of this war. However, I think it's safe to say the majority of men and women in our armed forces are also victims of the same conflict at the hand of the leadership that started it (and conducted it in such a horrific fashion).

Supporting the troops should be done on a case-by-case basis, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
44. By fighting an administration that is misusing our troops,...
,...we are giving support that makes a difference. We FIGHT for our troops, here at home. Our conservative counterparts FIGHT for the administration, not our troops, in my view.

We FIGHT for benefits for our troops.
We FIGHT for accountability/transparency of the motives by those sending our troops to a distant land to occupy a foreign nation.
We FIGHT for adequately equipping our troops.
We FIGHT for penalizing that leadership which misdirects our troops into violating laws and human rights.
We FIGHT against war-profitteers who nominalize the value of our troops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #44
82. Absolutely
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
45. I think DU does. I'm a conscientious objector myself.
And I have a lot of doubts about anyone who can be convinced to kill and possibly be killed in the name of something as arbitrary as a national border at the orders of a wealthy person who himself refuses to fight.

I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt, and I certainly don't wish any harm upon them.

I do think there are serious moral questions that should be faced before signing on the dotted line, and I wonder if all of our recruits truly recognize:

1) That they are putting their lives on the line, and...

2) Who and what, precisely, they are putting their lives on the line for.

I couldn't do it, wouldn't do it, and regard those who have with a bit of unease.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
47. this whole meme is the epitome of evil
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
48. Skittles and other DUers send care packages to the troops
they truly support those kids overseas.

Honestly, the only troop bashing I've seen on DU is by banned disruptors trying to stir up a shitstorm. People on DU actually put their money where their mouth is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #48
83. Thanks to all the Duers
that "put their money where their mouth is."

:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
50. That thread is incredible. I wish we had had "greatest page" then.
Thanks for pointing it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #50
66. Thank You
I was very moved by the sentiment in that thread. I originally posted it as a reply to another topic. BlueBear suggested that I post it as a separate thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
51. *
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
manic expression Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
55. I think DU does......I certainly don't. eom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
62. I don't support the war in Iraq, but I do support the rank and
Edited on Sun Feb-27-05 12:23 PM by Cleita
file military personnel who have to follow orders. I support the brass who object to the military as led by Rummy. I don't support the *W friendly brass that have replaced the ones who objected to the mis-use of our military. I hope I make sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyorDeath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
70. If you mean trying to get an early end to the occupation of Iraq
or drawing attention to all the cuts at the VA or, sending supplies to the troops then YES!!

If you mean the destruction of cities like Falluja or the killing of Civilians then NO!!

My Country right or Wrong is for the brainwashed sheep!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #70
84. I meant only to highlight the sentiment expressed here on Veterans Day
My personal opinion is that we need to support the individuals that serve, while we oppose the war. Our government has betrayed the trust of the soldiers.

I remember a quote that John Kerry gave during the campaign that was very touching to me. I do not recall the exact words, but it was something along the lines of a soldier agrees to serve and asks only one thing of the country, only send him to war because we have to, never because we want to.

Now, the soldiers are being held under stop-loss, they are deployed for up to 2 years, they are not properly equipped and they return to a "grateful nation" where the government could give a rat's ass about their health and well being. To me, supporting the troops means fighting to end the betrayal and hypocrisy of the government.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyorDeath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #84
91. Well said I agree 100 %
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
steve2470 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
72. Hell yes ! Bring them home NOW so they can LIVE ! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
74. "Support the Troops" is the same red herring they used in the '60s
The idea is that one must "support the troops" or be against the beleaguered GI's heroically defending the country against the commie..er..Iraqi..er..Syrian..er..Iranian...er..(insert enemy of the day).

It's not about "supporting" the GI cannon fodder sent to kill and die, it's about supporting the ambitions of politians and filling the bank accounts of the Military Industrial Complex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sparky_in_ma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
76. Thanks seito
For your service and those good people like you.:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #76
78. Thanks sparky
:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
79. Support the troops = End the illegal war with Iraq. All else is Bu$hpuke.
Edited on Sun Feb-27-05 02:22 PM by understandinglife
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=104&topic_id=3186499&mesg_id=3186499

Peace.


BU$HPUKE = ANY EFFORT TO JUSTIFY OUR ILLEGAL WAR WITH, AND OCCUPATION OF, IRAQ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
85. DU supports the troops in the way that matters most:
respecting the depth of their sacrifices, and seeing their service as a national treasure that should not be spent without the most serious consideration.

Anything less is an abomination. And that's what we have now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #85
88. Thanks bleever
This administration has betrayed the trust of our soldiers in every way possible. DUers support the troops with actions that speak so much louder than words, stickers or magnets.

We fight to end the back door draft, to help those that have chosen not to go to Iraq, to get the soldiers proper equipment and armor and to bring them home safe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemGirl7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
89. I supoort the troops alot...
but I really look down on people who say if you want the troops to come home (which I do)you are not supporting them...I think those people are so brain-washed by this faux patriotic crap, that they don't see that our troops are dying for a war based upon faux information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #89
95. That is the same mentality
used to paint anyone that disagrees with ** and his policies a traitor. ** has betrayed this nation and the military. It is our DUTY to oppose him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
90. I "support the troops" only in the sense that I want as few as possible
killed. I do not support their mission or their commander-in-chief or anyone who sent them into harm's way. Not at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #90
93. I agree
The purpose of this thread was to highlight the sentiment expressed here at DU on Veterans Day. I think we all want the same thing, an end to this war, and the troops returned home safe.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Califooyah Operative Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
92. yes. Du does. and that thread makes me proud of the many DU vets! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #92
94. Thanks for understanding the message
I am very proud of the service of so many here at DU. It is ridiculous for the right to claim that we do not support the troops. We support them in ways that really matter.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pauliedangerously Donating Member (843 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
96. This "support the troops" thing is ridiculous...
What does that really mean anyway? "I support the troops." Talk is cheap. I pay my taxes. I don't bitch about paying taxes. I don't consult with accountants to find ways to pay less taxes. Social Security and Medicare aside, I paid Uncle Sam six grand last year.

I don't think the troops give a rat's ass if I have a tacky yellow ribbon on my car, and I'm sure that thousands of them are more pissed off at the US government that I am.

I don't recall seeing any yellow ribbons when US troops were in the Balkans.

So what should DU do to show its support for the troops? Should we all be furnished with little yellow ribbon avatars?

Give me a fucking break already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #96
97. This was just a reminder of the sentiment expressed here on Veterans Day
Edited on Sun Feb-27-05 10:10 PM by seito
It was posted by request of another DUer. I am sorry that the term "Support the Troops" is offensive to you. Did you look at the attached thread in the original post?

So what should DU do to show its support for the troops? Should we all be furnished with little yellow ribbon avatars?


The question was rhetorical, and the answer was in the thread that is attached. DU does support the troops in ways that yellow magnet bearing, SUV driving, flag waving fundies never will.

Peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pauliedangerously Donating Member (843 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #97
116. I have no doubt of DU's support...
..and my frustration isn't directed at anyone or anything on this forum; it's directed at the idea in general.

I don't find the term "support the troops" offensive; I find it meaningless and vague, and I grow weary of people getting defensive when others criticize the military institution.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
independentchristian Donating Member (393 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
98. It is not about "the troops"
It is about the "policy" and the "ideology."

The "troops" are nothing but numbers to these cowards running the government. Nothing but an instrument to accomplish their goals.

They don't actually support "the troops."

They use "the troops" to further their fascist, imperialistic agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #98
99. Perhaps I should have titled this thread differently
Edited on Sun Feb-27-05 10:46 PM by seito
It was posted to highlight the sentiment expressed by members of DU toward Veterans.

I agree that ** does not give a shit about the soldier that he so easily sends to war. He has not attended one military funeral, and meets with the families when it suits his political agenda.

I also agree that the statement "Support the Troops" is overused, and meaningless to most people.

edit: sp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #98
100. Dupe
Edited on Sun Feb-27-05 10:46 PM by seito
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solinvictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
101. Support the troops by...
fighting like hell to have decent equipment, benefits, and a support system when they come home. At the same time, though, we need to give our civil leadership hell for placing them in harm's way on this fool's errand we have going in Iraq. Remember, they didn't make the policy to be there and, honestly, I do believe many of those indicted for prisoner abuse were told to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #101
103. I agree 100%
Those soldiers were following orders, albeit illegal orders.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nightwing Donating Member (489 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
102. YOU BET I DO!
I just don't support the madman in charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #102
110. My sentiments exactly n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lilith Velkor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
104. Um, some DUers *are* the troops.
A lot of others were, and even more (like myself) are friends and families of current and former military folx. I'm studying to be a counselor because there's gonna be a lot of kids who left their minds in Iraq. I've met some on the street already...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
105. "We support the troops" - except for the amputees
This DU thread (on which I posted) does not make a good case for "we support the troops" being an expression of genuine feelings. It concerns the return of Iraq War amputee David Rozelle to active duty in Iraq.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=1232373&mesg_id=1232373&page=

Some of the most disgusting comments were thankfully removed, but a lot of what remains is not cool.

There's so much to value in most DU threads, but not in that one.

Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Califooyah Operative Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #105
108. We do support the troops.
I agree there's some disgusting and tasteless things said in that thread, but a handful of folks in one thread, even if you could come up with a hundred people who speak like that about our troops, it's the tinyest of a minority at DU and most anywhere else for that matter. It's hardly representative of DUers as a whole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #108
109. I agree with you, Califooyah
Still, if we don't call it out on the tiny minority who post such trash, then the tiny minority will become larger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Califooyah Operative Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #109
111. I agree. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
107. I'M IN THERE!
Edited on Mon Feb-28-05 01:36 AM by Skittles
yes INDEED!

I've sent countless care packages to the troops in Iraq - rigging up an Easter package now!

THANK YOU for showcasing that thread - it was indeed amazing! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #107
112. Thank you Skittles
Thanks for your service, and thanks for everything that you do now. I know that you and other like you really make a difference :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
114. Hell yes
Not only am I an Army brat who happens to have a sibling fighting overseas right now, but I also voted for the Vietnam Vet last election. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dhinojosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
118. Sorry, I don't even know what that phrase means.
There is no description as to what context are they referring to.

For example, what if you wrote a thesis paper on some rhetorical subject. Somewhere in that paper, you use the words: support the troops. You turn that paper in and your English professor/instructor doesn't give you a great grade. You look down to see all the corrections and mistakes and you find next to 'support the troops' the words in red ink 'Doing What?'

That's what I am talking about. I am not going to be made to feel guilty from some stupid phrase that doesn't make any sense. I am educated enough to not have to put up with something like that. So if I get asked 'Do you support the troops?', I better get a description of what the troops are doing so that I can tell them that I support this, that, or the other.


In closing, let me ask you something, do you support auto-mechanics?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #118
120. Me either
Did you read the link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dhinojosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #120
122. yessir/mam
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #122
123. I do support auto mechanics
I sure could not get along without them :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UdoKier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
119. Unlike republicans, we support veterans.
In other words, we believe in fulfilling our obligation to provide them health care, counseling, help in finding civilian employment.

And unlike republicans, a lot of us do NOT support what they our troops are being forced to do in Iraq, and roundly condemn those who violate Geneva convention rules.

So you tell me, do we support the troops?

I suppose that we do, but I hesitate to use such worn-out jingoistic catch-phrases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #119
121. I would say yes, and I agree that the phrase is overused
I wish I had titled the thread differently, because it has become more of a debate over the phrase, and many have missed the point. I wanted to highlight a thread that I found to be very powerful, and expressed the respect that many DUers had for veterans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
124. DU, aka depleted uranium, does not support troops.
It kills them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #124
125. I am all too familiar with that n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct 31st 2024, 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC