|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
MikeG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-22-05 02:14 PM Original message |
Expect the 11th Circuit to order the feeding tube reinserted in Sciavo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jersey Devil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-22-05 02:17 PM Response to Original message |
1. Yes, but they also judges who have been attacked by congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MikeG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-22-05 02:20 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. They are more predisposed to continue the status quo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jersey Devil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-22-05 02:22 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Hmm? The "status quo" is no feeding/fluid tubes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sonicx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-22-05 02:29 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. i think before they denied the appeal because it was a state issue... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jacobin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-22-05 02:23 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. 11th Circuit is full of wingnuts, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-22-05 02:21 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Plus they have ruled several times in this case already |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jersey Devil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-22-05 02:24 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. I think it would rub against any judge's common sense to tell him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodhue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-22-05 02:24 PM Response to Original message |
6. I don't think they will. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jersey Devil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-22-05 02:26 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tempest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-22-05 02:25 PM Response to Original message |
8. The Florida federal judge was also conservative |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sonicx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-22-05 02:26 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Yup, AND the fed. judge that ruled today was a Republican |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tempest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-22-05 02:53 PM Response to Reply #9 |
19. Same judge as I'm talking about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GumboYaYa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-22-05 02:35 PM Response to Original message |
12. The legal standard for a TRO will be almost impossible to meet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MikeG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-22-05 02:46 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. If they are a Republican, watch that second standard dissolve. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jersey Devil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-22-05 02:49 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. but the 11th circuit denied a stay in Bush v Gore, or have you forgotten? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-22-05 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
13. The appeal was filed more than five and a half hours ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MikeG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-22-05 02:44 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. I have a little experience with stay orders. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jersey Devil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-22-05 02:53 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Some of us can say the same |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-22-05 02:42 PM Response to Original message |
14. the 11th circuit has a mix of judges |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no_hypocrisy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-22-05 05:25 PM Response to Original message |
20. If they overrule the district court, that's JUDICIAL ACTIVISM as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Jun 17th 2024, 01:20 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC