|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
seventhson
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 11:02 AM Original message |
General Clark Used Depleted Uranium in Kosovo War- Robert Fisk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Caution
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 11:08 AM Response to Original message |
1. Gimme a friggin break |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dfong63
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 12:54 PM Response to Reply #1 |
51. use common sense - permanently contaminating a land is illegal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 08:19 PM Response to Reply #1 |
100. Spoken like a true tobacco scientist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democrats unite
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 11:08 AM Response to Original message |
2. Feel better now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
homelandpunk
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 11:22 PM Response to Reply #2 |
111. no, not until we all bow our heads in shame |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Emperor_Norton_II
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 11:12 AM Response to Original message |
3. Wow! PNAC and depleted uranium! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roughsatori
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 11:13 AM Response to Original message |
4. Hope you have your flame retardant on. I was wondering |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangh0
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 11:14 AM Response to Original message |
5. BREAKING NEWS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoveTurnedHawk
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 11:16 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eloriel
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 11:51 AM Response to Reply #7 |
27. Actually, quite the opposite |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangh0
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 11:54 AM Response to Reply #27 |
29. Dismiss the truth? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoveTurnedHawk
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 11:57 AM Response to Reply #29 |
31. You Are on a ROLL Today! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wonk
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 05:46 PM Response to Reply #31 |
78. Irrelevant and intentionally changing the subject. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 08:41 PM Response to Reply #31 |
105. Not laughing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangha
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 11:24 PM Response to Reply #105 |
112. Lead is just as serious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eloriel
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 12:20 PM Response to Reply #29 |
37. Who are you referring to? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangh0
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 12:25 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. Damned if I know!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 11:17 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. LMAO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bandit
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 12:31 PM Response to Reply #5 |
41. Right Guns don't kill people Bullets do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangh0
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 12:36 PM Response to Reply #41 |
45. Wrong!! People kill themselves |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IranianDemocrat
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 07:49 PM Response to Reply #45 |
95. ROFLMFAO x100000000000000000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 08:35 PM Response to Reply #45 |
103. WRONG!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seventhson
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 03:10 PM Response to Reply #5 |
66. Got a link for that big news? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 03:16 PM Response to Reply #66 |
68. Who the hell defended DU? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangh0
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 03:21 PM Response to Reply #66 |
71. Google "Lead poisoning" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 08:30 PM Response to Reply #71 |
101. Ever heard of WWII Syndrome. sanguine? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangha
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 10:12 PM Response to Reply #101 |
110. Read it again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seventhson
![]() |
Fri Sep-19-03 05:08 AM Response to Reply #71 |
114. But does lead permanently damage the dna??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangh0
![]() |
Fri Sep-19-03 09:02 AM Response to Reply #114 |
116. It leads to death |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bowens43
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 11:15 AM Response to Original message |
6. He was in the military, he did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 11:16 AM Response to Original message |
8. PPfeh! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 07:45 PM Response to Reply #8 |
93. Are you tinfoiling Fisk...? The guy's a superb journalist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 08:37 PM Response to Reply #93 |
104. no, not fisk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tjdee
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 11:18 AM Response to Original message |
10. What did Dean use? Oh that's right, nothing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FubarFly
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 01:37 PM Response to Reply #10 |
58. If Dean authorized the use of Depleted Uranium I would condemn him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangh0
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 01:39 PM Response to Reply #58 |
59. So it was Dean who authorized the use of DU?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FubarFly
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 01:44 PM Response to Reply #59 |
60. No, Dean bombed Pearl Harbor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangh0
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 01:46 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. Vanilla Pepsi? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RichV
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 06:21 PM Response to Reply #60 |
80. But, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seventhson
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 03:15 PM Response to Reply #10 |
67. No, I was a strong critic of Clinton on ALL radiation exposure issues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
disgruntella
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 11:18 AM Response to Original message |
11. why do i have the feeling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
12. ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 07:31 PM Response to Reply #12 |
86. how unbelivably stupid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shance
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
13. Thanks Seventh - those are good points. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nothingshocksmeanymore
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
14. While I am AGAINST the use of DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ArkDem
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 11:42 AM Response to Reply #14 |
19. Bombers don't use DU. They are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nothingshocksmeanymore
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 11:45 AM Response to Reply #19 |
22. Sorry ...from the article ( I digress, I got the term wrong) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hayu_lol
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 03:41 PM Response to Reply #22 |
73. A-10 'Warthogs' have cannon...their purpose was to kill tanks... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
15. the furor over Clark will subside |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
realFedUp
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 11:33 AM Response to Original message |
16. Today's segment on democracynow.org with Fisk....re:Clark |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 11:34 AM Response to Original message |
17. Puleeze. Can't you do better than this. I knew there would be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangh0
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 11:35 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Of course he can't do better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hayu_lol
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 03:45 PM Response to Reply #18 |
74. Seventhson does this on every board he is on... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
latebloomer
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 11:48 AM Response to Reply #17 |
24. Yes, the dems should win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 11:52 AM Response to Reply #17 |
28. They won't because... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 07:50 PM Response to Reply #17 |
96. You're judging who "is" and "isn't" a Democrat? That's not your call. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 08:35 PM Response to Reply #17 |
102. Kahuna: "DU must censor those who don't support DU." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zolok
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
20. You were right to post this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoveTurnedHawk
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 11:43 AM Response to Reply #20 |
21. You Had Me Going! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddhamama
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
23. the U.S. used Depleted Uranium |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
latebloomer
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 11:50 AM Response to Reply #23 |
26. Military men only follow orders |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddhamama
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 11:58 AM Response to Reply #26 |
33. what the hell gave you that impression |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
latebloomer
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 12:33 PM Response to Reply #33 |
43. my point was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddhamama
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 12:43 PM Response to Reply #43 |
47. okay. but i'll argue that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
latebloomer
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 12:45 PM Response to Reply #47 |
49. agreed! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dfong63
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 12:35 PM Response to Reply #26 |
44. DU is a WMD, and its use is illegal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eloriel
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 12:31 PM Response to Reply #23 |
42. I guess all those people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangh0
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 12:36 PM Response to Reply #42 |
46. Wrong!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddhamama
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 12:50 PM Response to Reply #42 |
50. i am not trying to make excuses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddhamama
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 01:02 PM Response to Reply #42 |
53. you know,Eloriel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddhamama
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 01:09 PM Response to Reply #42 |
54. indulge me, Eloriel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Booberdawg
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
25. What a surprise, more righteous indignation and bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 11:55 AM Response to Reply #25 |
30. I'll take it further... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
latebloomer
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 11:58 AM Response to Reply #30 |
32. Great, Clark should run and win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nothingshocksmeanymore
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 12:01 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. I have no more delusions that Clark is the messiah than I have that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 12:04 PM Response to Reply #32 |
35. notice I said "a" Kucinich and "a" Clark... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangh0
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 12:30 PM Response to Reply #32 |
40. How dare you suggest that Clark is NOT the Messiah? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Booberdawg
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 12:20 PM Response to Reply #30 |
38. I don't even have a problem with that - he's entitled to his opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pepperbelly
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 12:06 PM Response to Original message |
36. and in Viet Nam, he used LEAD bullets!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dfong63
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 12:44 PM Response to Reply #36 |
48. read up on it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treepig
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 01:00 PM Response to Reply #48 |
52. you seem to have accidently mis-posted a link to DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FubarFly
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 01:32 PM Response to Reply #52 |
57. Here's another link for you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 01:21 PM Response to Original message |
55. I believe I read that Clark wanted to use ground troops |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangh0
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 01:24 PM Response to Reply #55 |
56. Ground troops?? That's awful! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IranianDemocrat
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 07:51 PM Response to Reply #55 |
97. Clark eats babies, and pokes holes in condoms! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leetrisck
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 02:06 PM Response to Original message |
62. Whatever in the hell are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dfong63
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 03:04 PM Response to Reply #62 |
64. want to support the vets? BAN DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leetrisck
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 05:38 PM Response to Reply #64 |
77. Spent lots of years screaming |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
_NorCal_D_
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 08:50 PM Response to Reply #64 |
107. Absolutely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
retyred
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
63. DU has been used |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dfong63
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 03:16 PM Response to Reply #63 |
69. not so fast |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ieoeja
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 03:08 PM Response to Original message |
65. Which candidate has said he will get rid of DU? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dfong63
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 03:19 PM Response to Reply #65 |
70. false premise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Chill
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 03:31 PM Response to Original message |
72. Shame on me? No shame here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pepperbelly
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 04:11 PM Response to Original message |
75. false premise, 7thson and a shameful one at that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FubarFly
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 06:07 PM Response to Reply #75 |
79. Do the Generals have to use the weapons provided by the politicians? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pepperbelly
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 07:23 PM Response to Reply #79 |
82. what would you have them do? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 07:35 PM Response to Reply #82 |
88. including nukes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pepperbelly
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 07:42 PM Response to Reply #88 |
91. T ... get hold of your imagination or maybe ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FubarFly
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 07:43 PM Response to Reply #82 |
92. I would have any General not knowingly violate international law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pepperbelly
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 07:48 PM Response to Reply #92 |
94. Clark operated within the law ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FubarFly
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 07:52 PM Response to Reply #94 |
98. I agree, Clark thought he was operating within the law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pepperbelly
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 07:59 PM Response to Reply #98 |
99. hard to say ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seventhson
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 07:21 PM Response to Reply #75 |
81. Orders are Orders, after all. Sounds like the Nazi defense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pepperbelly
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 07:31 PM Response to Reply #81 |
85. ok 7th son ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 07:36 PM Response to Reply #85 |
89. Maybe they could use conventional ordinance! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pepperbelly
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 07:40 PM Response to Reply #89 |
90. I do not believe that either ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrPrax
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
76. Hey don't forget Haitian breasts!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seventhson
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 07:29 PM Response to Reply #76 |
84. Jesus F*ckin' H. Christ!!! Clark Poisoned Haitian prisoners??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blitz
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 09:04 PM Response to Reply #84 |
109. LOL So, does this mean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seventhson
![]() |
Fri Sep-19-03 05:04 AM Response to Reply #109 |
113. I WOULD actually support Lieberman over Clark at this point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKNancy
![]() |
Fri Sep-19-03 06:59 AM Response to Reply #76 |
115. Unfortuately for you the article is bull-pucky |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FubarFly
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
83. Wesley Clark and DU in his own words- Spring 2001 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seventhson
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 07:34 PM Response to Reply #83 |
87. Obviously DUHH. If it is unexamined it will NOT be found. INDICT!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 08:47 PM Response to Reply #83 |
106. Does the above post qualify as a "Bash Clark" post? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FubarFly
![]() |
Thu Sep-18-03 08:55 PM Response to Reply #106 |
108. I view it as honest criticism. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun 15th 2024, 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC