Closer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-03-03 01:29 PM
Original message |
I was just watching CNN a bit ago and |
|
they had a sound bite from Howard Dean at the DNC Meeting today immediately followed by Wesley Clark, and Dean looked so much sharper and sounded so much more like a leader than Clark. Dean was speaking passionately without script, hammering the Bush Junta, while Clark sounded sheepish looking down the whole time reading his notes.
Sorry, just had to throw that out there. Did anyone else see?
|
mandyky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-03-03 01:31 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Yeah, I am willing to bet |
|
that Clark's speech was written by others. It was too cute by half in too many places.
|
eleny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-03-03 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. Didn't Carville help Dean and feed him a line recently? |
|
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm????????????
Let's not get into who wrote what speech for who, ok? They all have speech writers.
|
hedda_foil
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-03-03 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
19. My dear, that was one line that he was free to pick up or not. |
|
Let's not get specious here, okay?
|
Renew Deal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-03-03 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
15. Cut in half in too many places? |
|
Is this what Dean's education policy will produce?
|
ewagner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-03-03 01:31 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I thought it was unusual for Clark to read from a script. I've seen him do "standup" before and he's really pretty good at it.
Dean is really good at "standup".
|
readmylips
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-03-03 01:33 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I saw it....I Love Dean... |
|
Dean will be the only one who can cutdown little man bushie in a debate. Dean will not put up for bushie's cutesies and nonsense.
|
StephNW4Clark
(547 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-03-03 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. I think any 10 of them could cut Bush down |
|
the man barely speaks English. For fun, I'd love to see Al Sharpton and Bush debate.
|
NuckinFutz
(852 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-03-03 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
I think any of the ten could beat W in a debate. The doofus can't open his mouth without sticking his foot in it.
|
newyawker99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-03-03 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
spindoctor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-03-03 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
Any of the democratic candidates can cut down Bush in a debate. The guy is a nitwit. He doesn't do unscripted interviews. He cannot deal with surprises. Losing the debate is Al Gore's eternal albatros.
Throw in one unexpected attack and watch the SOB crumble. He can't smirk his way out of an intelligent debate. That's why he avoids them.
|
Gloria
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-03-03 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
12. Polls found that Gore WON the debates...but in the post-debate spin |
|
people were then sold the idea that he had lost!!
|
spindoctor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-03-03 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
I guess we can all agree on the above. :D
|
Ninga
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-03-03 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
have in Dean and Clark are chocolate cake and apple pie, both desserts, both very different in taste and delievery. Both delicious. Dean has so much passion and fight in him, and Clark has savy. It matters not how they appear in snippets and sound bites. WE CAN SUPPORT EITHER ONE,RIGHT?
|
StephNW4Clark
(547 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-03-03 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. I really hope that one of them |
|
gets head of the ticket (obviously for me Clark) but that regardless of who gets the nod, the other one becomes the VP.
I picked Clark b/c of his tremendous foreign policy experience, besides the fact that I am very impressed with his decision making process. I know someone's going to call me out but I do think national security is the overriding issue in this election and nothing remains unaffected by it - not the economy, not trade, not the environment. I think Clark has the clear advantage on issues of national security. The President of the United States isn't just President of the United States, but "leader of the free world" and I think Clark is the clear winner for that.
But I think Dean has solid domestic policy credentials (no foreign policy ones) and that's why I think it should be Clark/Dean.
If it turns out to be Dean/Clark, I think it'll still be a pretty good ticket. I'm just worried that the negativity will create too many bitter and betrayed feelings.
|
Closer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-03-03 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
Dean FIRST and FOREMOST. He, to me, is CLEARLY the best candidate running. The real deal, as it were.
However, when/if Clark clarifies his war stance, his Democratic Party stance, his PNAC connections, and a few other things, I MIGHT consider voting for him should he get the nomination.
Right now, to be honest, I'm wary of Clark.
|
diplomats
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-03-03 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
14. Please read Josh Marshall's interview with Clark |
|
http://talkingpointsmemo.comHe's very critical of the PNAC. I don't know what connections you're talking about???
|
sangh0
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-03-03 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
16. They passed each other in the hall one day |
|
which is proof enough for some that they are intimately related.
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-03-03 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
Closer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-03-03 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
|
like you CONTINUE to give Clark supporters such a good name :eyes:
|
Brucey
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-03-03 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
welcome to DU! Nice to have you.
|
Larkspur
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-03-03 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
21. To me Clark is poison-berry pie, not apple pie |
|
I don't trust generals becoming Presidents without first proving that they can win a lower civilian political office in the party they claim to be a member of, like governor, senator, or US Rep, manage the affairs of that office well, and win re-election once before running for President.
The 2004 Dem ticket for me is Dean/Gov Richardson of New Mexico. Richardson is a Democrat, a current governor, former US Rep, and has foreign policy expertise. Bush Admin asked him to negotiate for a short time with North Korea last year.
|
Pastiche423
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-03-03 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
22. "To me Clark is poison-berry pie, not apple pie" |
|
I thought of Sleeping Beauty when I read the analogy to apple pie. On the outside, the apples may look shiny and tempting, but take a bite at your own peril.
|
liberalnurse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-03-03 03:04 PM
Response to Original message |
18. I saw most of the original..... |
|
Dean was truely empowering the group! Very compelling and had everyones attention and respect.
|
SWPAdem
(951 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-03-03 03:32 PM
Response to Original message |
|
The non-partisan wing of the Democratic party seemed to think that they both did a great job.
|
catforclark2004
(208 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-03-03 05:38 PM
Response to Original message |
25. Corporate Media given their orders---- Push Dean....Bush don't want Clark |
|
Just as suspected, Dean will get great coverage......and we will be fooled just in time for the General Election......Where we will lose with Dr. Dean.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Jun 15th 2024, 05:00 PM
Response to Original message |