|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
i_c_a_White_Ghost
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 09:41 AM Original message |
Dream ticket 08 - Clark/Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dalloway
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 09:42 AM Response to Original message |
1. clark yes edwards no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Loge23
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 09:42 AM Response to Original message |
2. I prefer Gore/Clark (eom) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
we can do it
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 10:15 AM Response to Reply #2 |
14. Me too.....n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Southsideirish
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 10:42 AM Response to Reply #2 |
24. Me too! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Neocondriac
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 11:39 AM Response to Reply #2 |
34. I can't give Mr Snore another chance.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peabody71
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 12:26 PM Response to Reply #34 |
39. Yeah well, media corruption and election fraud..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 02:56 PM Response to Reply #34 |
77. "Mr Snore" Oh My, how original and creative. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laruemtt
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 01:40 PM Response to Reply #2 |
57. Gore / Clark - me three! n / t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 02:17 PM Response to Reply #2 |
67. that would be a good ticket |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snotcicles
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 02:49 PM Response to Reply #2 |
75. count me in on this one n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bryant69
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 09:42 AM Response to Original message |
3. I like it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skink
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 09:43 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. How about Clark/Fiengold |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheCowsCameHome
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 10:00 AM Response to Reply #4 |
11. That could be something good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
5. I would most definitely vote for that ticket. Looking around at what we |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
autorank
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
6. Edwards supported the war -- terrible judgment, not a good qualification. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ultraist
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 01:41 PM Response to Reply #6 |
58. Clark said he probably would have voted for the war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
7. Clark, yes. Edwards, no. I still don't see what he brings to the table. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nvliberal
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 01:08 PM Response to Reply #7 |
45. Clark, NO, for he brings nothing whatever to any ticket. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lanlady
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 09:55 AM Response to Original message |
8. Why Edwards? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
i_c_a_White_Ghost
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 09:58 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. I take it Edwards is not popular anymore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheCowsCameHome
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 10:04 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. I liked Edwards, but once you've lost it's tough to overcome that image |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1932
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 11:05 AM Response to Reply #12 |
27. FDR lost as VP and then won as President. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nvliberal
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 01:10 PM Response to Reply #10 |
47. Strange, for Edwards is STILL popular. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K-W
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 01:05 PM Response to Reply #8 |
43. But Edwards is strong on economic issues. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nycmjkfan
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 09:56 AM Response to Original message |
9. ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladjf
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 10:09 AM Response to Original message |
13. Not bad. But, I'd like to see Conyers on the ticket. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BayCityProgressive
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 10:16 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. I would like to see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladjf
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 10:40 AM Response to Reply #15 |
22. I'm real high on Cynthia McKinney. I'd vote for her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hippiegranny
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 10:17 AM Response to Original message |
16. I'd vote for this ticket |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
17. For those mentioning Gore... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peabody71
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 12:30 PM Response to Reply #17 |
41. If he saw that he could be of service... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 10:29 AM Response to Original message |
18. Clark/RICHARDSON !!!!!!! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
More Than A Feeling
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 10:31 AM Response to Original message |
19. Dream ticket: Feingold/Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gauguin57
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 10:36 AM Response to Original message |
20. I think Feingold's second divorce is gonna sink him in the southern states |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donna Zen
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 11:24 AM Response to Reply #20 |
30. He could get away with it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SlowDownFast
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 10:39 AM Response to Original message |
21. Whatever. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithy Cherub
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 10:41 AM Response to Original message |
23. Clark most definitely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
25. Clark/Someone who won't stab him in the back |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1932
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 11:04 AM Response to Original message |
26. Tickets with candidates with different philosophies don't work well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithy Cherub
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 11:14 AM Response to Reply #26 |
28. Clark, Gore, Obama, Villaraigosa proud liberals. No to Iraq War Team. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1932
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 11:29 AM Response to Reply #28 |
32. I'm dividing them on allocation of power -- wall st or middle class |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithy Cherub
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 11:41 AM Response to Reply #32 |
35. That corporate strategy alignment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1932
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 12:55 PM Response to Reply #35 |
42. Yes, in Bizzaro America. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K-W
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 01:10 PM Response to Reply #35 |
46. Edwards is NOT pro-corporate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ultraist
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 01:47 PM Response to Reply #46 |
60. True. Edwards is very progressive on social issues and very ANTI corp |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K-W
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 01:07 PM Response to Reply #28 |
44. Umm yah if we base everything off one issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithy Cherub
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 01:26 PM Response to Reply #44 |
51. That "issue" is the one that matters most. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K-W
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 01:38 PM Response to Reply #51 |
55. Prioritizing issues is one thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithy Cherub
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 02:12 PM Response to Reply #55 |
61. On economics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K-W
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 02:22 PM Response to Reply #61 |
68. Actually yes you can. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithy Cherub
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 02:29 PM Response to Reply #68 |
70. What has gone before, sets the stage for what will come. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K-W
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 02:45 PM Response to Reply #70 |
71. Certainly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithy Cherub
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 03:01 PM Response to Reply #71 |
78. Progressives are going to want |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K-W
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 03:35 PM Response to Reply #78 |
79. Progressives voted for Kerry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KnowerOfLogic
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 02:52 PM Response to Reply #51 |
76. Exactly. Jeezus Christ; i guess we shouldn't hold WW2 against Hitler. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K-W
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 03:36 PM Response to Reply #76 |
80. So John Edwards is like Hitler? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bernardo de La Paz
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 11:15 AM Response to Original message |
29. Let the 2006 leaders be the "dream ticket" for 2008. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Yossarian Joad
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 11:27 AM Response to Original message |
31. Real close.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 01:16 PM Response to Reply #31 |
49. Agree ! Good looking package too! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 11:33 AM Response to Original message |
33. Would an Arkansas/North Carolina Democratic ticket be enough to garner ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
36. Edwards/Clark or Clark/Edwards - would 2 southerners be a problem? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 12:26 PM Response to Reply #36 |
40. The country would NEVER elect a ticket with two Southerners on it. Please! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ultraist
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 01:45 PM Response to Reply #40 |
59. We don't need to cater to the solid Blue states |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
37. Why do we want re treads from 04? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K-W
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 01:14 PM Response to Reply #37 |
48. We should niether prefer, nor exclude retreads. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peabody71
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 12:23 PM Response to Original message |
38. I have to say GORE! and whoever he thinks is right for VP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackthesprat
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 01:19 PM Response to Original message |
50. Never. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K-W
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 01:28 PM Response to Reply #50 |
53. He screams electability. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackthesprat
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 02:13 PM Response to Reply #53 |
62. Screams? come again? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 02:16 PM Response to Reply #62 |
65. He was the only one in the primary to win a state |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K-W
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 02:27 PM Response to Reply #62 |
69. That just isnt true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 02:15 PM Response to Reply #50 |
64. Nothing about that deserves support. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzjunkysue
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 01:26 PM Response to Original message |
52. More cowbell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bee
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 01:34 PM Response to Original message |
54. Since we're dreaming... Conyers/Boxer. sigh~ n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mayberry Machiavelli
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 01:38 PM Response to Original message |
56. I think this would be one of the better possible Dem tickets. WAY better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 02:14 PM Response to Original message |
63. Clark needs to be in government somewhere. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 02:16 PM Response to Original message |
66. I'm not sold on Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TroubleMan
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
72. Well my dream ticket would be Kucinich/McKinney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
troubleinwinter
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 02:47 PM Response to Original message |
73. CONYERS for me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KnowerOfLogic
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 02:49 PM Response to Original message |
74. Absolutely not. No war supporters, as either prez or VP. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density
![]() |
Sat Oct-08-05 03:44 PM Response to Original message |
81. Edwards ain't gunna work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 16th 2024, 01:17 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC