|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
louis c
![]() |
Mon Oct-10-05 07:48 AM Original message |
Bush Job Approval Near All-Time Low at Rasmussen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Mon Oct-10-05 08:03 AM Response to Original message |
1. I Don't Think He Does Any Polling At All |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
louis c
![]() |
Mon Oct-10-05 08:04 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. You could be correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durablend
![]() |
Mon Oct-10-05 08:07 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. So you mean he's going to be IMPEACHED tomorrow? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Mon Oct-10-05 08:08 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. If His Polls Stay In The Toilet And Rove's Indicted He'll Be A Lame Duck |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salin
![]() |
Mon Oct-10-05 08:14 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. I think he has just become a lameduck already |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
louis c
![]() |
Mon Oct-10-05 03:50 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
louis c
![]() |
Mon Oct-10-05 08:11 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. There may be an election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Supersedeas
![]() |
Mon Oct-10-05 04:12 PM Response to Original message |
8. there is still room among rational Repubs for this number to dip further |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LaPera
![]() |
Mon Oct-10-05 04:34 PM Response to Original message |
9. So according to Rasmussen, WHEN exactly was Bush numbers Lower??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
louis c
![]() |
Mon Oct-10-05 07:29 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Sept. 20 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM
![]() |
Mon Oct-10-05 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
10. I'll say this much for Rass |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LaPera
![]() |
Mon Oct-10-05 04:55 PM Response to Original message |
11. Does anyone know or anyone care, WHEN, Bush poll numbers were |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
louis c
![]() |
Mon Oct-10-05 08:57 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Rasmussen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Czolgosz
![]() |
Mon Oct-10-05 04:59 PM Response to Original message |
12. I need to read Rasmussen in context (or is this my pollkatz fixation?) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 16th 2024, 02:16 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC