Pacifist Patriot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 01:33 PM
Original message |
How in the world can you find 12 impartial people for the jury... |
|
unless you find 12 ignorant people? Hmm....
Our country is as divided as it's been in eons. Good luck finding jurors. Change of venue? Tibet? ;)
|
skids
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 01:37 PM
Response to Original message |
1. We've got tons of ignorant people. |
|
It isn't like we're running out of them here :-)
The challenge will be finding jurors that are both ignorant and competant.
But that's probably a lot easier than finding trials for celebrity sex crimes.
|
VolcanoJen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 01:38 PM
Response to Original message |
2. That's going to be a District jury, too. |
|
And that's not likely the kind of jury pool the White House would prefer to draw from.
|
Talismom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 01:38 PM
Response to Original message |
3. ooooo, ooooo, take me, puleeeease! LOL! n/t |
momisold
(148 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 01:39 PM
Response to Original message |
|
There are lots and lots of people who are "apolitical", who don't live and breathe politics, parties, etc. More people knew about OJ and Michael Jackson then this case.
|
goodhue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 03:19 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun Jun 16th 2024, 09:08 AM
Response to Original message |