Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Loungers who thought that Braveheart was crap

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 10:45 AM
Original message
Poll question: Loungers who thought that Braveheart was crap
I'm talking not the Carebear, but about Mel Gibson's film.

Did you think that it was crap before his anti-Semitic, torture-porn psychotic breakdown?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. It would be a stinker even if it starred Michael Moore or Alec Baldwin or Nick Nolte.
Except then it would be a funny stinker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. Michael Moore? Bowling for Stirling? The Bruce and me?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. I threw my Mel Gibson DVDs in the oven after his breakdown and arrest










:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. That's hawt!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ano Genitus Donating Member (165 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. From my cold dead hand!
Re. The Road Warrior, at any rate. That's the only one I own or am interested in owning. It seems to predate his nastiness by enough time, at least by my finely-tuned ethical standards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. Crap or not-crap?
I know I saw at least part of it, but it was unmemorable. I don't remember how good or sucky it was. So I answered choice #2.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aristus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. I knew it was a piece of unwatchable crap long before I discovered
what a right-wing tool Gibson is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. Epic crap just like Troy, although Troy seemed like a parody--still crap though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. I really liked Troy.
I especially liked the nihilistic views if Achilles. "Somebody has to lose." Also, the subject of religion versus rationality was pretty starkly presented. The characters are fleshed-out a little more in the director's cut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. i thought Troy was hilarious, seriously, they had me at "Helen's run off....with the trojans!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. I liked Troy for the same reason I liked Gladiator,300 and Braveheart...
Edited on Mon Feb-25-08 12:51 PM by youthere
Guys in skirts/kilts. Very hot. I can never go to Scotland because I would become some kind of nympho and probably get arrested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. I remember seeing an adult magazine.....playgirl?
with photos of a Scottish looking red haired man wearing a kilt with nothing underneath.
Also, lying suggestively on the bed.

I don't remember who showed the dirty mag to me, or how I saw it. I was just a vulnerable teen. I just may have picked it up off the shelf and looked, knowing me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. You have to admit...it had a great ending...
Gibson being drawn and quartered ALWAYS deserves an award in my book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyler Durden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Especially since when the ax came down, his nuts and dick had already been ripped off.
That part is particularly gratifying. But I figure any Mel Movie I own already is paid for and the only one who loses in that bargain is ME. Payback is still a periodic watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anarcho-Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. I found it difficult to watch
Mel's accent drifted from Scotland, to Ireland, to South Africa, to America, to Australia and back to Scotland again.

Never mind the fact that William Wallace stood about 6'8" in reality.

As an action film it wasn't bad, but I don't think it was worthy of its Academy Awards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. Really enjoyed the film despite historical errors and ...
... an over-the-top performance by Gibson. Now that I know what a psychopath he is, I can't watch it anymore. Same with Mad Max. And it is not just his Passion film or his bigotry towards Jews either. It's everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. Why would I judge a person because of a drunken tirade.
I'd have no friends left,if I did that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. I loathed Mel Gibson long before his breakdown. I always thought he was an
egomaniacal asshole and every movie he was in just had to make him the hero with the hot ass. Yuck. "What Women Want"? Count me out.

Braveheart wouldn't have been my kind of movie regardless of the lead, but he made it worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stanwyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. He lost me after "The Year of Living Dangerously"
Which is the last movie I remember with him that was decent. He was fine in "Mad Max" and "Gallipoli". I believe "Bird on a Wire" resembles absolutely the worst of Hollywood. Totally agree about "What Women Want" Creepy on so many levels. I watched the Academy Awards last night and the silence that greeted Mel's image as the different montages were shown told the story. His anti-Semitic rant has made him an outcast in that community. As well it should.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:58 AM
Response to Reply #13
22. I have long, long refused to see that bastard's films
absolutely
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
16. I wouldn't say it was crap, but it certainly wasn't good.
And my opinion has nothing to do with Mel's politics or religious beliefs. People who base their appreciation of art on the politics or religion of the artist make me sick.

It just wasn't a very good film.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
19. I thought it was an entertaining movie. However, I strongly disagree with...
the underlying theme of this and so many other Gibson films -- redemption through suffering.

It likely goes back to the man's strong Catholic faith, but I think the Christian religions kind of dropped the ball there. Here we have a guy whose entire message was loving everyone -- up to and including your worst enemies -- and for some reason, the most important part of his life is his torturous death, because in his death, supposedly, there is redemption for mankind. But that's just something Christians tacked onto it afterward to give it meaning. That entire theme, redemption through suffering, is a horrific invalidation of not only everything that Jesus stood for (if we are to take the man at his words put down in the Bible), but, I think, also everything we as a human race should be moving toward.

Trying to find grace and goodness in pain and anguish is simply a not-so-clever attempt to justify all the pain and anguish in the world. Instead of doing that, we should recognize that pain and suffering are not our natural state, and that we should therefore do whatever we can to eradicate these things, and to live our lives in as little pain -- and causing as little pain to others -- as humanly possible.

All too often, Christianity emphasizes that Jesus suffered, died and rose again after three days (granted, a neat trick), instead of emphasizing his own message -- that we should treat everyone else as we would like to be treated, and that, when others cause us pain, our response should not be vengeance, but instead, forgiveness.

There is no redemption through suffering. But there is grace in forgiving suffering caused to us, and in doing our level best to avoid causing pain to others. But in Braveheart, as in nearly Gibson's entire ouevre, we find a man who is all too ready to glorify anguish as a means to happiness. And if there is a God, I cannot imagine that this is his/her/its plan.

Whew! Forgive my getting off on a rant here. I've been turning over this anti-redemption through suffering thing in my head since reading a story in last month's Esquire (the Best and Brightest issue), in which the magazine's touted latest-best-thing in fiction was a writer with a similar outlook viz-a-viz this theme. I found the short story he wrote for that issue of Esquire as repugnant as I find Gibson's films, though in both cases I grant that there is talent in the artistry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
23. Rob Roy was better
The other Scottish period piece that came out that year.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct 31st 2024, 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC