|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge |
![]() |
LaraMN
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 03:12 PM Original message |
What an idiot. A guy in our town tried to sue the owners of a dog he hit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kwassa
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 03:27 PM Response to Original message |
1. In some states owners are held responsible for their animals actions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissMillie
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 08:28 AM Response to Reply #1 |
35. Yep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tyler Durden
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 08:30 AM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Except that the damage he claims is impossible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissMillie
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 08:37 AM Response to Reply #36 |
37. right... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
2. I'd be pissed if I was in that guy's shoes also. I'm assuming the guy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Parche
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 03:31 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Thats A Little Ruff |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 03:48 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. Arf Arf!!1!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrsMatt
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 03:32 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. The dog was in the house |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanMichael
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 03:36 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. that's too bad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lyric
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 04:11 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. The same could be said about owning a car. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 04:15 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. That's the most logically fucked thing I've read all week |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rabrrrrrr
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 04:26 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. Your argument works only if the car had been driven into the dog's yard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanMichael
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 04:34 PM Response to Reply #10 |
20. Baloney. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 09:00 PM Response to Reply #20 |
29. Mine is in my chest cavity, just left of center. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrsMatt
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 03:32 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. dupe post / nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pierre.Suave
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
6. I understand the guys reasoning... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanMichael
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 03:34 PM Response to Original message |
7. ummm sorry. I agree with guy; not the judge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kay1864
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 04:24 PM Response to Reply #7 |
14. I sorta agreed with your subject line at first... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanMichael
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 04:37 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. I didn't ask the owners to pay for the damage to my car |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kay1864
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 08:53 PM Response to Reply #21 |
27. No no, I wasn't talking about *your* situation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hobarticus
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 08:38 AM Response to Reply #7 |
38. Your case, and this case, have only one thing in common: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanMichael
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 08:59 AM Response to Reply #38 |
42. I think I am responsible for damages caused by my pets |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hobarticus
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 11:03 AM Response to Reply #42 |
48. But the damage wasn't "caused" by the dog, was it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanMichael
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 11:12 AM Response to Reply #48 |
50. the car belonged in the street. The dog didn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hobarticus
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 11:22 AM Response to Reply #50 |
52. Well, a lot of things don't belong in the street |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tyler Durden
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 11:04 AM Response to Reply #42 |
49. It would help if the damage was mathematically possible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanMichael
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 11:13 AM Response to Reply #49 |
51. well, if that's true, then hey. They don't need to worry about it, eh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pokerfan
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 04:11 PM Response to Original message |
11. That's nothing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rabrrrrrr
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 04:17 PM Response to Original message |
13. If the dog's owners don't have the integrity to pay for his repairs, then he should sue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 04:25 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. on a side note |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rabrrrrrr
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 04:27 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. I don't think all states have mandatory insurance yet - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 04:30 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Looks like it's mandatory. Hmm. Hey, check this out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LaraMN
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 04:31 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. That's correct. It's mandatory. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suninvited
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 04:44 PM Response to Reply #17 |
60. Mandatory insurance usually applies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOPisEvil
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 06:34 PM Response to Reply #15 |
26. Liability insurance is mandatory, full coverage is not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kay1864
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 08:57 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. The judge disagrees with you, so no, the guy's not in the right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Midlodemocrat
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 11:02 AM Response to Reply #15 |
47. Here, you can pay a 'bond' of sorts somewhere like $400 if |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hobarticus
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 10:59 AM Response to Reply #13 |
46. Why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rabrrrrrr
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 02:04 PM Response to Reply #46 |
55. You're really stuck on the "he hit the dog" train of thought. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hobarticus
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 02:42 PM Response to Reply #55 |
56. LOL...you'd make a fine lawyer..."my client's car didn't hit the dog..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rabrrrrrr
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 04:35 PM Response to Reply #56 |
59. That's not even close to what I said, but continue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hobarticus
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 05:23 PM Response to Reply #59 |
64. "The car did not hit the dog..."?!? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 04:06 PM Response to Reply #13 |
58. What if it was a toddler that broke free? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rabrrrrrr
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 05:13 PM Response to Reply #58 |
61. OMG! What if it was a Prussian? Or a vacuum cleaner? Or a changed mind? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 05:14 PM Response to Reply #61 |
62. Would you still want to sue the parents? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rabrrrrrr
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 05:17 PM Response to Reply #62 |
63. Your logic is impeccable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue Diadem
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 04:50 PM Response to Original message |
22. Hitting a 13# dog did all that damage? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FloridaJudy
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 05:07 PM Response to Original message |
23. He would have had to be going awfully damn fast |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue Diadem
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 05:23 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. I think so too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tyler Durden
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 08:25 AM Response to Reply #25 |
34. I did the math down thread: 150 mph. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue Diadem
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 09:09 AM Response to Reply #34 |
43. Thanks Tyler, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tyler Durden
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 09:31 AM Response to Reply #43 |
44. No cover charge. I was bored with PPAPs anyway. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue Diadem
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 01:00 PM Response to Reply #44 |
53. umm.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
huskerlaw
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 05:14 PM Response to Original message |
24. The judge was correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Burma Jones
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 06:58 AM Response to Original message |
30. So just how fast was this guy driving in what I assume is a residential neighborhood? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tyler Durden
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 08:13 AM Response to Original message |
31. FUN with MATH!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rabrrrrrr
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 08:16 AM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Not if he slammed the brakes, bringing the front of the car down. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tyler Durden
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 08:24 AM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Then he sacrifices SPEED. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hobarticus
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 08:43 AM Response to Reply #31 |
39. Not agreeing with the guy, but he's also figuring in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tyler Durden
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 08:56 AM Response to Reply #39 |
41. Damage he claimed is not physically possible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hobarticus
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 10:53 AM Response to Reply #41 |
45. Oh I agree. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last_texas_dem
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 08:45 AM Response to Original message |
40. I wonder how much he would've tried to get out of the family |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
montanto
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 01:09 PM Response to Original message |
54. Sheesh, this is silly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Inquisitive
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 03:28 PM Response to Original message |
57. This man should be awarded! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 16th 2024, 02:18 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC