MadBadger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 12:46 PM
Original message |
Apparenty Obama will get The Crap beat out of him in South Dakota, According to ARG |
|
ARG has Clinton winning 60-34, which makes little sense to me....oh ARG http://www.americanresearchgroup.com/
|
Drunken Irishman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 12:47 PM
Response to Original message |
1. It makes perfect sense...it's ARG. |
Waya
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 12:49 PM
Response to Original message |
|
...... that my fellow NA's in South Dakota remember WHO DIDN'T PARDON LEONARD in favor of Marc Rich, dammit..... c'mon, Pine Ridge, Rosebud.....REMEMBER......
|
aquart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
6. Obama says he'll pardon Peltier? |
|
Oh, and pardons aren't either/or. The right is absolute and there's no limit on how many.
So, how soon after he's in office does Obama say he'll pardon Peltier?
|
CountAllVotes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. wow, I hope he does pardon Peltier!!! |
Waya
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. No, Obama didn't say that he'll pardon Leonard..... |
|
...but Clinton didn't pardon him after he said he would - and Leonard was literally taken off the list in favor of Marc Rich. When voting tomorrow one should remember that, apparently, that the Clintons can't be trusted, at least,when it comes to affairs in Indian Country.
|
aquart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
14. And I repeat: the list doesn't have a limit. |
|
The president can pardon as many as he likes. You don't have to remove one to put another one on. So, don't mind me, but I ain't buying this little tale.
|
EmperorHasNoClothes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 12:54 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Let's hope not, that could net her 5 whole delegates! |
|
And Saturday taught us that only 4 delegates are enough to risk the entire election over. :crazy:
|
SoxFan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 12:54 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Dick Bennett has jumped the shark |
|
He's always been a less than reputable pollster, but now he's just making up off the wall numbers, hoping that some SD reporter calls him for comments.
Sad, really.
|
MadBadger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. I know. I heard it was closing in, but a 26 point Clinton win is absolutely ridiculous |
rox63
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 01:06 PM
Response to Original message |
9. I heard this morning on NPR that Obama is favored to win both SD and MT by sizable margins n/t |
MadBadger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. I just read on Marc Ambinder's blog that Clinton Aides expect a less than 10 point loss in SD |
|
And a sizable loss in MT. Id love to know whats up with the ARG poll.
|
jezebel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. I read that too but I gotta say I'm worried that's Clinton spin so she can be "shocked" with her SD |
|
win. Both Hillary and Bill are in SD today and have been there quite alot this past week. I think they put out they expect to lose by up to 10, and then can claim "buyers remorse of Obama" to the Supers when/if she wins. Especially if she wins big. Ugh.
|
MadBadger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. If ARG's polls were on target, she would be spending all her time in Montana |
|
They have her down four there. If she really was up 26 in SD, why spend any time there? Try to close the last four points in Montana. Obviously these polls are bullshit.
|
jezebel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. Believe me I hope you're right. I guess I'm assuming Montana is safe for Obama. I don't think there |
|
is any way Clinton will win by 26 points in SD. But if she wins by say 10 after her camp is putting out she will lose by 10 that sets up a nice little narrative for her. And with the press all calling both SD and Montana for Obama for the last few weeks a 10 point win in SD will give them a new talking point fed right to them by the Clinton camp.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Jul 30th 2025, 05:40 PM
Response to Original message |