Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Longtime Allies Move to Heal Rifts After Gay-Marriage Fight

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-08 03:16 AM
Original message
Longtime Allies Move to Heal Rifts After Gay-Marriage Fight
NOVEMBER 29, 2008

Longtime Allies Move to Heal Rifts After Gay-Marriage Fight
By TAMARA AUDI
WSJ


Gay-rights and black and Latino groups in California are working to repair the fractures caused by this month's vote that outlawed same-sex marriage in the state. Californians voted 52.3% in favor of the measure, which amends the state constitution to define marriage as being between one man and one woman, ending what had been a brief period when same-sex marriage in the state had been legal. Shortly after the Nov. 4 vote on the measure known as Proposition 8, exit polls indicated black and Latino voters strongly supported the ban, which has led to a complex and, at times, bitter debate among communities that have considered themselves allies on such issues as discrimination, education and social justice.

After the vote, anger in the gay and lesbian community spilled into the open at protests in Los Angeles, San Francisco and elsewhere. At some, blacks and Latinos said they were called racial slurs, and some online debates have degenerated into racially charged confrontations, even though critics have since discredited many of the exit polls and argued that the minority vote wasn't powerful enough to swing the vote. Two weeks ago, 16 leaders in the gay, black and Latino communities issued a statement calling for unity and for an end to the divisive comments, particularly ones directed at blacks. The Anti-Defamation League, a Jewish group that fights bias, issued a statement calling for people "to channel their frustration and disappointment in productive and responsible ways."

Many black and Latino figures were taken aback by the severity of the response in the gay community. "The relationship is greatly strained," said the Rev. Samuel Rodriguez, president of the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference in Sacramento. Mr. Rodriguez campaigned to pass Proposition 8. He says he doesn't believe in same-sex marriage but supports civil unions for gay couples. "Marriage is not a civil right. It is an extension of our religious faith," he said, adding, "This community that preaches love and tolerance is so intolerant to my religious faith."

The brunt of the outrage in the gay community over Proposition 8 has been directed at the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Mormons were the most prolific fund-raisers for Proposition 8, contributing millions of dollars to the campaign.. But it was the anger toward black and Latino communities that caught many off-guard. A blogger on the Web site Mollygood.com posted a map of Los Angeles showing the voting trends on Proposition 8. "Here's your handy-dandy visual representation of LA's homophobia...Conclusion: Another way to look at this map is as a guide to show you where Los Angeles ethnic minorities and old people live. Sad but true." Rod McCollum is a 37-year-old gay black man who writes commentary and a blog on gay issues on his Web site Rodonline.typepad.com. Mr. McCollum said he received a posting to his Web site from a gay black student who said white protesters shouted racial slurs at him during a protest at a Mormon church. "It was like being at a klan rally except the klansmen were wearing Abercrombie polos and Birkenstocks," the young man wrote.

Several religious leaders from the black and Latino communities said that during the campaign, gay and lesbian activists framed the marriage issue as a civil-rights battle, and they assumed black and Latino voters would support their cause. But that message didn't necessarily resonate... Some black community leaders said the gay-marriage campaign didn't spend time or money courting the black community. Meanwhile, those in favor of banning gay marriage worked hard to get their message out through black and Latino churches. "It was a miscalculation that we would see it as a civil-rights issue," said the Rev. Eric Lee, an African-American and president and chief executive of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference of Los Angeles, who supports gay marriage.

(snip)

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122791678765565599.html (subscription)
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
WillParkinson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-08 04:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, because only deserves Civil Rights...
They're too good for everyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
WillParkinson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-08 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Bah. It took out part of my message...
Should have said, "Yes, because only (insert group) deserves Civil Rights.

They're too good for everyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Glorfindel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-08 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Sadly, I think you're right
And gays are the common enemies of "everyone else." We forget that at our peril.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-08 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. yep -- that is exactly right. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. There have been several letters of people caliming that just as we accept
Obama as the winner of the elections we should "accept" the same results for Prop. 8.

I was tempted to ask the letter writer whether he would have a similar opinion had a state voted to change its constitution to bring back slavery, or to ban inter racial marriages.

There is a difference between selecting a representative and changing the Constitution to take away rights from a specific group.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. So Marriage is an extension of their faith
Why isn't he out trying to deny Atheists the right to marriage?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
VADem11 Donating Member (783 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Exactly
That argument makes no sense at all in a country as diverse as the USA. Last I checked, it was the state that issued marriage licenses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Aug 01st 2025, 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC