Better Believe It
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-30-09 07:24 PM
Original message |
Democrats Need 51 Senate Votes to get things passed, not 60 votes like Republicans claim |
zbdent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-30-09 07:25 PM
Response to Original message |
1. They need the 60 votes to break a filibuster ... |
|
and I keep hearing Dems say that they "don't have the votes" ...
|
Oregone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-30-09 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Strange, because during the Bush era, they never needed 60 to get anything they wanted done |
zbdent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-30-09 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
if they (the Dems) got something done, it was what Bush wanted done ...
If by "they" you mean the Repugs, you're right ... because the media was all behind THEM ...
|
Davis_X_Machina
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-30-09 07:44 PM
Response to Original message |
4. They'll be hard-pressed to get fifty... |
|
... because there are 40-43 Democrats. The rest are 'Democrats'. And in the House, the problem isn't always the Blue Dogs.
|
ejpoeta
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-30-09 08:12 PM
Response to Original message |
5. frankly, the dems want to have a reason they aren't getting anything done as promised. |
|
they 'need' it because they don't want to do it. there aren't enough that actually want to get things done.
|
timeforpeace
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-30-09 08:21 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Hey, break the news to Harry, will ya? |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Jul 23rd 2025, 08:06 PM
Response to Original message |