Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Penalty for not having insurance is too low

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU
 
YewNork Donating Member (449 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 05:23 PM
Original message
Penalty for not having insurance is too low
Why is the fine in the for not having health insurance so low?

The fine in the Senate bill, and in what will be the reconciled House bill, will be $695/year or 2.5% of income, whichever is higher.

My private insurance costs me $290/month or $3480/year.

Based on a penalty of $695 or 2.5% of income (whichever is higher), it means that unless my income exceeded $139,200, it would be cheaper
for me to just pay the penalty, and then buy insurance when I get sick - because they wouldn't be able to deny me coverage.

Not that I would do it. I value my insurance, but don't you think many people would?

You'd think the penalty would be higher than what health insurance would cost, so that people would want to buy insurance instead.

Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Welcome to DU. I smell a rat.
Literacy is your friend. Try it next time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
YewNork Donating Member (449 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. You smell wrong - I've been posting to DU for a long time and my question is legitimate
I'm fully in favor of the bill being passed, in fact I'd rather it were single payer, but I'm willing to accept this as
a step along the way.

Still, I thought that because insurance companies couldn't deny coverage, it was necessary for everyone to carry insurance.
Otherwise, there would be a lot of young people who would rather pay the fine because it was cheaper. They are the ones
we need in the insurance pool in order to spread the cost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Socialism Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
17. Cost?
This health care bill will raise premiums on every one. You think it is going to get cheaper if the government controls it your fooling yourselves. When has the govenment EVER run an enterprise better than the free market? NEVER! You cant force someone to buy something they dont need. I dont need BMW but should I be fined and taxed because i dont want it? I dont eat cabbage. Should I be forced to buy it because the GOVERNMENT says I need it because it is good for my health?

I have had the flu once in my life 25 years ago. I dont see a doctor. I dont get the flu shot every year like a lot of idiots who do. I am in the best health of my life. WHY should I buy health insurance? To pay for the idiots who go see quacks er I mean doctors because they have fallen victim to the fundamental reason why they do get sick? Because they tell themselves they will get sick if they do such and such thing? You want to live healthy and stay illness free? Live a positive life style. The mind controls the body not the body controls the mind. Last time I got a cold which lasted more than...oh 10 hours? Never!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
YewNork Donating Member (449 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Because you still can become ill or be injured
You can live a healthy lifestyle and still be stricken with an illness (ask someone who was told has been diagnosed with multiple sclerosis or who is told that he has brain cancer (amongst quite a few other diseases), or you could be hit by an uninsured or underinsured motorist and end up in an emergency room. And when you can't pay, because you didn't want to have insurance, I end up paying in form of higher prices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. the insurance companies agree with you, surprisingly enough
sooooo, do you advocate debtor's prisons as well, if they can't pay? Or just chain gangs? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Socialism Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-10 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
18. Chain gangs
Good point. This health care bill is a travesty. This is a dangerous thing. Now that the government can force us to buy something we want is the end of freedom. The patriot act was bad but this health care reform is worse. Democrats are not listening to the people. Our country is not a government by politicians who thing they know what is best for us. It is a government of the people by the people. When those elected no longer listen to the people it is tyranny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. Fine with me
I would rather there be no mandate at all, but a mandate that has no teeth is also fine with me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
YewNork Donating Member (449 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. The mandate is necessary in order to cover people with pre-existing conditions
If people can't be denied for having a pre-existing condition, then you have to have a mandate. Otherwise, people will only buy insurance when they get sick.
We need them to be paying for insurance when they're healthy as well is sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. The fine increases year over year.
Starts low, will go up.
I do not know the answer to this next bit, maybe someone can help out:

How soon after the bill passes does the fine kick in?
How soon after the bill passes, does the no denial of coverage clause kick in?

Lastly, if a company can get away with forcing us to buy their insurance, how soon before another company will force us to buy lawyer policies, or funeral policies, or..?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
YewNork Donating Member (449 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. $695 is the price after it has gone up.
In 2014, the penalty is $95.

In 2016, the penalty is $695 or 2.5% of income whichever is higher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Socialism Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. unfair tax
Edited on Sat Mar-27-10 09:41 AM by Socialism
I will not buy insurance and i will refuse to pay fine. It is unamerican to put people in jail for NOT paying this fine, which is really a tax...This country was founded on the principle of not paying an unfair tax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
YewNork Donating Member (449 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. That's OK, the IRS knows how to garnish wages
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
regnaD kciN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. Actually, if you're bothered by the fine, you'll be even more bothered by this...
...you're exempt from the mandate if the cost of insurance (after subsidies) comes to more than 8% of your gross adjusted income. So lots of individuals earning less than $70,000 and families earning less than $125,000 would be able to get away without paying a cent in penalties for not having insurance.

You're free to be upset by that, and want it to change. Hell, you can even fight for a law where you'd have to pay hundreds or thousands per month in either premiums or penalties. But keep in mind that the main sticking point about HCR for most Americans is "being forced by government to buy expensive private insurance or pay a fine for the 'privilege' of remaining uncovered," and that that's the tack that the G.O.P. will use in November against us. Anything that makes the mandate less painful for the average American is fine with me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. I Had Never Heard That
and that's going to prevent a lot of horror stories.

I live in a working-class part of Baltimore, and everyone here scrapes by on small paychecks and side work. Without an escape valve like that, it would really penalize people who are already up against the wall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. The biggest problem is, we keep
focusing on insurance and coming up with Rube Goldberg schemes to fix what's wrong. In other words, we are just diddling with the symptoms. The root cause of our health care problems IS the insurance.
We need to do what every other civilized country has already done. Single Payer!
Single Payer, Universal Health Care. It is in the Constitution, twice, under "...general welfare..." Demand your Constitutional rights!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
YewNork Donating Member (449 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Agreed, single payer is the preferred choice, but this is still a step in the right direction
Keep in mind, not every country with universal health care has done it with single payer, but they've done it. And we need to do no less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Socialism Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. Constution?
You did not read the constitution very well... The constitution limits the federal government powers over the states in commerce. This bill is unconstitutional. A better way would throw out the illegal aliens out of the country who use healthcare and not pay for it in emergency room visits... and limit medical malpractice law suits to $300,000...eliminate all the unnecessary procedures so to satisfy said malpractice insurance. There is ONE thing i agree with this healthcare bill and that is deial of benefit for preexisting condition. What if your born with epilepsy? or Cereberal Palsy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
YewNork Donating Member (449 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Which means you agree with the mandate
And you realize that it's impossible to eliminate exclusions for pre-existing conditions (even the ones people are born with) unless there's a mandate for everyone to have insurance,
because without the mandate people woudn't buy insurance until they got sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. I share your suspicions
As I understand it, the "fines" would be put in a fund for catastrophic care of the uninsured. At some point, the care paid for from that fund would be more expensive than the fine money flowing into it. Frankly, I see medical costs and insurance premiums going through the roof whether we have band-aid HCR or not.

If I were a young sole proprietor, I might just happily pay this fine as a form of cheap catastrophic care policy, and skip paying ever-rising premiums from do-nothing insurance companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Socialism Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. Fund?
Do you really believe that? this kind of thing is ripe for corruption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Socialism Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
13. Health care reform?
This health reform is unconstitutional....since when has the
government ever had the power to COMPELL the american people
to demand they have health insurance? The federal govenment
does not have that power...this health care reform(if you wish
to call it that) forces me, a father of two, who CANT afford
health insurance, to buy insurance, which means less money to
put away for retirement or put away money for my children's
college education.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
YewNork Donating Member (449 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. If you can't afford it, then you'll get money to help you buy it
Problem solved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
OpieTaylor Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 05:07 AM
Response to Original message
23. You're right it is cheaper
You're right it is cheaper to just pay the unconstitutional fine. That's why the day after King Obama signed the bill I dropped my $200.00 a month health Ins.. After all it's always been illegal for Dr.'s and hospitals to deny health-care for lack of Ins., and now You want to buy it for me so my credit rating wont even suffer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Trey9007 Donating Member (140 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
24. The mandate is needed........
Edited on Fri Apr-09-10 10:50 PM by Trey9007
But not just because it helps off set the costs of covering people with pre-existing conditions. The mandate is needed because the federal government mandates that hospitals treat you, when you need treatment, regardless of your ability to pay. So all those who think they don't want health insurance coverage, you are already guaranteed some coverage by the Federal government. The health care fine helps pay for the minimum coverage guranteed by Federal law. So pay your share!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
RM33 Donating Member (73 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-18-10 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
25. We should not be forced to buy insurance.

What does it mean to live in a free country anyway? Seat belt laws, helmet laws and now this.

To live in a free country means that I can live my life the way I want to, not how the government makes me live.

I hope the supreme court declares mandatory purchase of health insurance illegal. That way we can start over.

My solution would be medicare for everyone. Just lower the age of Medicare so anyone can use it. Those who can't afford it, get it free. Those who can pay a fair price.

We have this type of relationship now with public libraries. I can get my book for free at the library or I can buy it. My choice.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Sep 06th 2025, 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC