Bobbieo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-25-08 02:35 AM
Original message |
Did anyone else see Brian Williams on the NBC Evening news tonight |
|
discussing the 4000 soldiers who have died in the Iraq war and wonder WHY he seemed to stress the word "volunteers" when referring to the deceased members of the military.
Somehow the term seemed to be out of context.
|
flor de jasmim
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-25-08 02:36 AM
Response to Original message |
1. it's the party line to diminish responsibility - despicable (n/t) |
Bobbieo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-25-08 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. I sensed the use of the term was deliberate but wasn't sure why - |
|
That was so unnecessary!!!Are there any objective news reporters left in the business?
|
MADem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-25-08 02:52 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Well, I was a volunteer, myself. |
|
But I didn't sign up to be a sitting duck. I didn't sign up to be a pawn in a blood for oil scheme.
When will people start to realize that "the NBC family" is NOT their friend? Even though they have "Keeeeeeeeith?"
That fat fuck Frank Luntz called that adorable Brian Williams "The GOP go-to guy" for his "nearly indetectable ideological bias."
In other words, he could sell their bullshit because he had that 'truthiness' quotient. He "sounds" fair.
|
Skittles
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-25-08 03:03 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. seriously? he said that? |
Bobbieo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-25-08 03:14 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. Yes he used the word ":volunteers": and at the time it |
|
seemed to be a most inappropriate term to use in describing the 4,000 military who died in the serice of our country.
|
MADem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-25-08 05:52 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
10. I have cited this in the past. It's one of his most famous lines, the cretin. |
|
Mentioned in passing here: http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2007/11/20/williams/index.htmlGOP pollster Frank Luntz previously wrote that "Williams has emerged as the 'go-to network anchor' because of his brains and 'lack of detectable ideological bias.'" Williams is also a confessed admirer of Rush Limbaugh, saying: "I do listen to Rush. I listen to it from a radio in my office, or depending on my day, if I'm in the car, I will listen to Rush" and protesting that "I think Rush has actually yet to get the credit he is due." Williams invited Limbaugh on as a guest several times to the show he hosted prior to becoming anchor and royally referred to Limbaugh as "our friend Rush Limbaugh."
The Original Cite, courtesy of MEDIA MATTERS: http://mediamatters.org/items/200502070007?f=s_searchPaul Bedard's "Washington Whispers" column in the February 14 edition of U.S. News & World Report noted that Brian Williams -- who replaced Tom Brokaw as anchor and managing editor of NBC's Nightly News on December 2, 2004 -- received accolades from discredited Republican pollster Frank Luntz in a memo to Republican Congressional leadership. In the memo, Bedard reported, Luntz wrote that "Williams has emerged as the 'go-to network anchor' because of his brains and 'lack of detectable ideological bias.'"
Media Matters for America has identified some examples that may explain why Republicans consider Williams to be their "go-to network anchor":
In an interview following President Bush's February 2 State of the Union address, Williams failed to correct Senator John McCain's (R-AZ) false assertion that the Social Security trust fund will have "no money at all left" in 15 years.
On January 12, Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) noted that an NBC Nightly News segment on Social Security ignored privatization critics and presented a conservative activist as an impartial "analyst." The FAIR report stated that, although Williams prefaced the segment by mentioning that "critics say he's exaggerating the problem to sell his plan," the actual report "included no such critics of the administration's 'crisis' rhetoric."
In a December 2, 2004, interview with C-SPAN founder, president, and CEO Brian Lamb, Williams said that "it's my duty to listen to Rush" Limbaugh and that "Rush has actually yet to get the credit he is due." Before his promotion, Williams hosted several other NBC news programs, including The News with Brian Williams on MSNBC and CNBC, where Limbaugh was a frequent guest. As Media Matters previously noted, on September 24, 2002, Williams introduced a News segment on a speech by former Vice President Al Gore by observing: "ur friend Rush Limbaugh told his radio listeners he almost stayed home from work, not due to any health reasons, but because he was so livid at the speech given yesterday by former Vice President Al Gore criticizing the Bush administration's apparent march to war in Iraq." Williams asked, "Is it un-American to speak out against the Bush plan to take on Iraq? Is it democratic to ridicule and threaten those who do?" Washington Post columnist and Brookings Institution senior fellow E.J. Dionne Jr. responded on the September 28, 2002, edition of CNN's Reliable Sources: "Since when do we debate that it's un-American to take on a president? ... We are told all the time it is the liberal media, and here Rush Limbaugh not being able to get out of bed supersedes what Al Gore says. If you -- if you want to have Rush Limbaugh on trashing Al Gore afterward, fine. Report the news. Report what he said, and then criticize him."
In a "fact check" segment following the October 8, 2004, presidential debate, Williams implied that Senator John Kerry's assertion that the U.S. economy had lost 1.6 million jobs under President Bush was deceptive -- falsely claiming that Kerry's use of "private sector jobs" numbers applies to "just one category" of jobs, when in fact it includes all non-government jobs and is, according to The New York Times, "a better predictor of the economy's future, analysts say."
On September 29, 2004, MSNBC dropped Luntz from its planned presidential debate coverage, apparently in response to a letter from Media Matters outlining Luntz's GOP ties and questionable polling methodology. In January, Luntz indicated that he believes that reporters are reporting fairly only if they use President Bush's preferred terminology to describe Bush administration policy.
|
Bobbieo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-25-08 03:03 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
6. I think the indetectable, ideological bias popped up tonight wth "volunteers" |
|
It was almost stated with a sneer. I don't have cable so I have never watched Tim Russert on his "Meet the Press", but his appearance turns me off - the epitome of arrogance.
|
Skittles
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-25-08 04:17 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. let's all guess Brian William's miliatry service |
Berry Cool
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-25-08 05:56 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
11. I am well aware that the NBC family is not my friend. |
|
I know their primary business is to make money, not to be my friend.
I consider Keith a lucky anomaly. (Without extra E's. Referring to him as "Keeeeeeeeith" strikes me as a means of mischaracterizing all people who like him as stupid fanboys/fangirls, which I have not found to be the truth at all.)
|
KingOfLostSouls
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-25-08 02:55 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Sean Hannity's butt buddy spinning |
|
wow, who'd have thunk it.
|
Berry Cool
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-25-08 05:58 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
12. I haven't trusted Williams since learning that he likes Rush and considers him legit. |
|
And Cheney indeed is the lowest life form crawling the earth.
|
anniebelle
(701 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-25-08 05:32 AM
Response to Original message |
9. That was Cheney's line from yesterday. |
|
He was letting all those know that are so worried about our troops that they, after all, VOLUNTEERs for this crap! That man has to be the lowest life form on this planet. That was his little follow-up vaudeville trying to clean up his "SO" remark. Gawd I despise that man.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun Oct 12th 2025, 02:18 AM
Response to Original message |