zbdent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-27-08 12:32 PM
Original message |
The point can be made ... If (when, I hope) Obama becomes President 1/20/2009, there will be no |
|
"national security blunders" ... mainly because the Republicans will do whatever they can to stop anything that Obama wants to get through. That is, unless we get 60 Dem Senators in place (we have to have 60; Joe Lieberman will be so angry that his man didn't win that he will sulk in the corner and throw out filibuster threats like an airline baggage carousel, v1.0).
We have the prime evidence going on right now ... the Republicans are more than able to stall every piece of legislation which could possibly help the American population (instead of just make oil available for corporations to sell to the highest bidder with no concern about the average Joe). And this is from the party which threatened to abolish the filibuster with the "nukular option" ...
|
opihimoimoi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-27-08 12:41 PM
Response to Original message |
1. 60 is the magic number....we need 60..... |
|
The Pukes have blown their leadership role...totally...
The GOP Party is Kaput.....evil and counter productive.....weaned on Lie Cheat Steal...they have sold our children to economic bondage/debt....they deserve NOTHING but SCORN...
|
zbdent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-27-08 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. and don't even bother thinking about holy Joe in that 60 |
|
he loves the attention he gets from the "mainstream liberal media", being the "intelligent Democrat" ... :puke:
|
opihimoimoi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-27-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. Joe has revealed his Despicable Factor to the POINT of total Rejection |
BonnieJW
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-27-08 01:00 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Don't forget that the repugs do it because they can. |
|
Harry Reid lets them get away with it.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Oct 04th 2025, 03:00 AM
Response to Original message |